Dragon7OP Posted June 25, 2011 Report Share Posted June 25, 2011 Exactly what it says in the title. [img]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/9873/322015.jpg[/img] Any comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Strawberry Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 I would be pissed if I finally got a God card out only to be hit with this. Just about the only counter for them so...9 /10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Bump. Any other comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Post lore so OCG correction is easier. The pic is not that great, and nice effect. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Lore: activate only while you control a Level 1 monster. If there is a Level 10 or higher monster on your opponent's side of the field, banish it immediately, ignoring the card's effect. If you do not control a Level 1 monster, destroy this card. Your opponent can then Special Summon 1 monster that was banished with this card's effect (ignoring the summoning conditions). I'm glad the effect is good. I know the picture is bad, but it was really hard to edit together the images to make a Mokey Mokey kicking the crap out of the Egyptian gods. For some reason, I couldn't find any actual images that showed that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Activate only [b]while[/b] you control a Level 1 monster. If there is a Level 10 or higher monster on your opponent's side of the field, banish it immediately, ignoring the card's effect.[s] If you do not control a Level 1 monster, destroy this card. Your opponent can then Special Summon 1 monster that was banished with this card's effect (ignoring the summoning conditions).[/s] I's a normal trap so that is not needed. If you change it to a continuous then you could add that in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 It was supposed to be continuous. I must have missed that. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Not even side deck worthy. Yes, it's that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Godfather Zandaa' timestamp='1309119819' post='5312523'] Not even side deck worthy. Yes, it's that bad. [/quote] O.K... Could you be a semi-not-jerk and tell me why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309120829' post='5312578'] O.K... Could you be a semi-not-jerk and tell me why? [/quote] I find it funny that you cannot figure it out on your own. Alright, just look at the current metagame of YuGiOh. Nobody runs Level 10 or higher monsters (except Shooting Quasar Dragon, but that's another story). This reason alone makes this card unusable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Godfather Zandaa' timestamp='1309121229' post='5312601'] I find it funny that you cannot figure it out on your own. Alright, just look at the current metagame of YuGiOh. Nobody runs Level 10 or higher monsters (except Shooting Quasar Dragon, but that's another story). This reason alone makes this card unusable. [/quote] And I find it funny that [i]you[/i] can't figure out how to use a card like this. Honestly, a 6-star member and you can't even see a single card's value? I can name six uses for this off the bat. 1. Meklord Emperor decks, both for and against. 2. Against any deck that runs either Red Dragon Archfiend or Stardust, since one of their combined 6 advanced forms is likely to be included. And wouldn't you know, this matches with what [i]you [/i]said. 3. Against certain Blackwing Decks 4. Against any deck with a Wicked card in it. 5. Against any deck with an Earthbound Immortal cardin it. 6. Against any deck that runs [i]any [/i]card that's level 10 or higher, or even level 9 given the right circumstances. Also, with level-changing cards, you can use this against various other decks as well. Not all of these decks are meta, but the meta changes every new release. So it doesn't matter anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309121895' post='5312651'] 1. Meklord Emperor decks, both for and against.[/quote] Probably the only useful way of running this card, and yet, Meklords have better ways of getting themselves onto the field, without using situational cards like this. [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309121895' post='5312651'] 2. Against any deck that runs either Red Dragon Archfiend or Stardust, since one of their combined 6 advanced forms is likely to be included. And wouldn't you know, this matches with what [i]you [/i]said.[/quote] I only included SQD, but it wouldn't be that much of a gain since SQD is replaced with SSD when it leaves the field. And so what if [i]one of their combined 6 advanced forms[/i] might be targeted? It still doesn't make the card any more useful because it has some targets that most decks don't even run, aside SSD, SQD and RND (and nobody really runs RND anymore). [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309121895' post='5312651'] 3. Against certain Blackwing Decks[/quote] There are no Blackwing decks that run Level 10 monsters. [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309121895' post='5312651'] 4. Against any deck with a Wicked card in it.[/quote] Nobody uses decks based on any of the Wicked creatures, because they're not worth it. [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309121895' post='5312651'] 5. Against any deck with an Earthbound Immortal card in it.[/quote] There are too few EI decks ran to make this card useful. [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309121895' post='5312651'] 6. Against any deck that runs [i]any [/i]card that's level 10 or higher, or even level 9 given the right circumstances.[/quote] There are too few decks ran at the moment that run Level 10 or higher monsters to make this card useful. [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309121895' post='5312651'] Also, with level-changing cards, you can use this against various other decks as well. Not all of these decks are meta, but the meta changes every new release. So it doesn't matter anyways. [/quote] Sure, the meta does change, but the change doesn't make bad situational cards good, unless some really, really broken Level 10 or higher monster is released, that is also easy to get out. Until then, this card is still bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Godfather Zandaa' timestamp='1309123615' post='5312739'] Nobody uses decks based on any of the Wicked creatures, because they're not worth it. There are too few EI decks ran to make this card useful. There are too few decks ran at the moment that run Level 10 or higher monsters to make this card useful. [/quote] I know many people who run EI decks and wicked decks. >.> Your statements are false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Bravo. Just Bravo. You have successfully taken a card that I made and completely missed the point, turning it into a debate about the meta of the game. I wonder how you are level 6 without even being able to recognize a card that shouldn't ever be taken seriously. It was only supposed to be a card about the weak cards slapping the strong ones in the face. [i]But I guess you missed that.[/i] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Deity Quetzalcoatl Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 @Godfather Zandaa way to be an ass, guy. Well, I found it amusing at least. Hell I'd run it just for Mokey Mokey. Mokey Mokey FTW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309124216' post='5312775'] Bravo. Just Bravo. You have successfully taken a card that I made and completely missed the point, turning it into a debate about the meta of the game.[/quote] If I recall correctly, I didn't turn it into a debate, since I didn't pot the "6 reasons" why this card is actually "good". I just responded back with reasonable arguments. [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309124216' post='5312775'] I wonder how you are level 6 without even being able to recognize a card that shouldn't ever be taken seriously. It was only supposed to be a card about the weak cards slapping the strong ones in the face. [i]But I guess you missed that.[/i][/quote] The purpose of this section is that people could post [i]realistic[/i] cards in it. If you make a card that shouldn't be taken seriously, don't post it in the Realistic Card section, but in the Any Other Cards section instead. Also, I guess you missed the point in my posts. I look at cards and critique them on how useful they would be in the meta game. Yes, criticism. You should get used to it. And why are you bringing the level of members into this? Haven't you already figured it out? The levels of members in YCM mean [i]nothing[/i], so stop brining them up when you're trying to post an argument on this site. [quote name='The Deity Quetzalcoatl' timestamp='1309124928' post='5312823'] @Godfather Zandaa way to be an ass, guy.[/quote] So I'm an ass just because I critique a card? Yeah, f[color="#000000"]uc[/color]k you too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309124216' post='5312775'] a card that shouldn't ever be taken seriously. [/quote] This place is for people to rate cards, where some people actually rate on usablility rather than [i]OMG THAT IS SO COOL 10/10[/i] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Godfather Zandaa' timestamp='1309125758' post='5312874'] The purpose of this section is that people could post [i]realistic[/i] cards in it. If you make a card that shouldn't be taken seriously, don't post it in the Realistic Card section, but in the Any Other Cards section instead. Also, I guess you missed the point in my posts. I look at cards and critique them on how useful they would be in the meta game. Yes, criticism. You should get used to it. And why are you bringing the level of members into this? Haven't you already figured it out? The levels of members in YCM mean [i]nothing[/i], so stop brining them up when you're trying to post a argument on this site.[ [/quote] Oh, I'm [i]Sorry[/i]. I guess I failed to speak your [i]language[/i]. Allow me to try again. I have no intention of ever creating cards to fit into the current meta. In fact, I truly don't care about the meta. I post cards that [i]don't [/i]follow the meta, not to try to make them fit, but to spark ideas for other people to create their own cards. And to get a laugh along the way. We seem to have an imbalance. You focus on if the cards work, and how they work now, in relation to what you know. I focus on guiding others to find their own styles, methods and areas. I personally prefer breaking the meta and making awesome (yet sometimes impractical) cards. 'Sides, there's a line between criticising and being a jerk. I can't tell which side you're on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Deity Quetzalcoatl Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Miror B.' timestamp='1309125874' post='5312879'] This place is for people to rate cards, where some people actually rate on usablility rather than [i]OMG THAT IS SO COOL 10/10[/i] [/quote] True, but is there really a need for someone to blatantly insult the card? Hurting people's feelings is only going to rile them up. I understand it's a [i]Critique[/i], but I'm pretty sure the word constructive is what separates a Critique from rude Criticism. While nobody HAS to be nice it's always respectful to be Light-Footed with words, but you know that's just me being considerate and kind you know... stupid things (Also Plz don't take this as an insult directed to you. It's not, I just felt it needed to be said.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.