Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 [center][img]http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/7749/128884v.jpg[/img] [i]Cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. Must be Special Summoned by Tributing 1 Level 4 FIRE monster. When this card destroys a monster your opponent controls: Your opponent takes no Battle Damage. When this card destroys a Level 3 or lower monster: Inflict damage to your opponent equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster. When this card destroys a Level 4 or higher monster: Inflict damage to your opponent equal to half the ATK of the destroyed monster.[/i] I saw the pic and thought "must use". A decent burn card in its own right. It can still attack directly to inflict Battle Damage, but not any other way. Any, CnC?[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
六兆年と一夜物語 Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 I'm quite old and the removal of some of the nomi text is bothering me. [i]When this card destroys a monster your opponent controls: Your opponent takes no Battle Damage.[/i] I don't really understand the colon, and I'd much rather prefer a comma, but hey, who knows if it's the official grammar. I like the effect, and it's good to punish low-level high-ATK defense position monsters. Oh, and, Alistar is a boss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 [quote name='Antagonistic Crocodile β' timestamp='1311045999' post='5368015'] I'm quite old and the removal of some of the nomi text is bothering me. [i]When this card destroys a monster your opponent controls: Your opponent takes no Battle Damage.[/i] I don't really understand the colon, and I'd much rather prefer a comma, but hey, who knows if it's the official grammar. I like the effect, and it's good to punish low-level high-ATK defense position monsters. Oh, and, Alistar is a boss [/quote] The colons are the New OCG. The Nomi has the same wording as what I used but the following is added: [i],and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways.[/i] The wording I used makes it Semi-Nomi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Must be Special Summoned by Tributing 1 Level 4 FIRE monster, and cannot be Summoned by other ways. Decent card is decent, Nice support for Beasts. Though i prefer burn depending on the Level, still good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 overall this seems to reminds me a little of Shinato's effect is that what you were basing it off of, Striker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1311076951' post='5368633'] overall this seems to reminds me a little of Shinato's effect is that what you were basing it off of, Striker? [/quote] TBQH, I really don't think of other cards unless I'm in support mode. I took a look at it and saw the similarities. @Maha: Oops. Didnt need Special in it. The amount of damage depends on the Level and the destroyed monster's ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 i know. What i mean is like destroyed monster's Level x ?? No need i think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 well yeah. Makes sense. Balance is ok. Summoning Conditions..are ok OCG is fine Useful effect - You dont get your opponent in Attack Position that often so yeah. 8.5/10 sounds fair to me (and you were right..a must-use pic..it's great ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Thanks for the comments guys. Keep them coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel of Silence Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Pix is good. OCG seems fine. It's balanced. It's got a good burn effect. I like the idea of your opponent taking damage depending on the level of the monster. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Thanks Star for the comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neos the Ancient Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 [quote name='Mr. Striker' timestamp='1311045390' post='5367979'] [center][img]http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/7749/128884v.jpg[/img] [i]Cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. Must be Special Summoned by Tributing 1 Level 4 FIRE monster. When this card destroys a monster your opponent controls: Your opponent takes no Battle Damage. When this card destroys a Level 3 or lower monster: Inflict damage to your opponent equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster. When this card destroys a Level 4 or higher monster: Inflict damage to your opponent equal to half the ATK of the destroyed monster.[/i] I saw the pic and thought "must use". A decent burn card in its own right. It can still attack directly to inflict Battle Damage, but not any other way. Any, CnC?[/center] [/quote] [b][center]OCG Fix:[/center] [/b][i]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by Tributing a Level 4 FIRE Monster. When this card destroys an Attack Position Monster your opponent controls by battle, your opponent takes no Battle Damage. When this card destroys a Level 3 or lower Monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster. When this card destroys a Level 4 or higher Monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to half the ATk of the destroyed monster. [/i] I'd much prefer the name Gore, Warrior of the Royal Flame. Other than that, pretty good. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 [quote name='Neos the Ancient' timestamp='1311115950' post='5370237'] [b][center]OCG Fix:[/center] [/b][i]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by Tributing a Level 4 FIRE Monster. When this card destroys an Attack Position Monster your opponent controls by battle, your opponent takes no Battle Damage. When this card destroys a Level 3 or lower Monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster. When this card destroys a Level 4 or higher Monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to half the ATk of the destroyed monster. [/i] I'd much prefer the name Gore, Warrior of the Royal Flame. Other than that, pretty good. 8/10 [/quote] I used, and prefer, the New OCG. Thanks anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 [quote name='Neos the Ancient' timestamp='1311115950' post='5370237'] [b][center]OCG Fix:[/center] [/b][i]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by Tributing a Level 4 FIRE Monster. When this card destroys an Attack Position Monster your opponent controls by battle, your opponent takes no Battle Damage. When this card destroys a Level 3 or lower Monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster. When this card destroys a Level 4 or higher Monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to half the ATk of the destroyed monster. [/i] [/quote] NOBODY CARES THAT YOU DO NOT LIKE THE NEW OCG. Get the point here already, the new OCG is the CORRECT one, so stop posting [i]wrong[/i] OCG fixes just to get useless +1's for your post count. OT: Honestly, the card would be balanced even if you got rid of the "no battle damage" clause from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 [quote name='Power Play' timestamp='1311116510' post='5370254'] OT: Honestly, the card would be balanced even if you got rid of the "no battle damage" clause from it. [/quote] So your saying that there should be Battle Damage on top of the Burn? Hum, interesting indeed. I'll think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.