D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 [center][img]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/613/101278.jpg[/img] [i]This card cannot be destroyed by battle. Once during each turn if this card would leave the field it does not. During each Standby Phase for each turn that this card is face-up on the field, increase it's ATK by 700. Once per turn, you can decrease this monsters level by 2, to banish 1 card your opponent controls. [/i][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 inb4ragnarokpostsauselesspost Card is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 self boosting, pretty good shame it can't hold its own during the initial phases I would have given it a base atk of 1300, and then allowed it to raise by 400 for each turn it stays on the field instead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 20, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 [quote name='Power Play' timestamp='1311197384' post='5372545'] inb4ragnarokpostsauselesspost Card is bad. [/quote] Negged for no real inpute [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1311197410' post='5372548'] self boosting, pretty good shame it can't hold its own during the initial phases I would have given it a base atk of 1300, and then allowed it to raise by 400 for each turn it stays on the field instead [/quote] Hmm, I'll just add another effect to it. Not much of a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 ok that makes it better to hold its own ground now for the battle immunity I'll rate the card at 8.6/10 now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 20, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1311197920' post='5372579'] ok that makes it better to hold its own ground now for the battle immunity I'll rate the card at 8.6/10 now [/quote] That was already in the effect.............. Anyways, gave it some lv. modifying play abillity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Frost Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 PUT THIS CARD IN THE YVD!!! NOW!!!! 9.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 20, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 [quote name='Cody Frost' timestamp='1311198442' post='5372599'] PUT THIS CARD IN THE YVD!!! NOW!!!! 9.4/10 [/quote] Ehh, well okay. -Just knows there's going to be another argument- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Frost Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 [quote name='♥ D.A._Fortune Lady ♥' timestamp='1311198874' post='5372620'] Ehh, well okay. -Just knows there's going to be another argument- [/quote] I don't think there's going to be an arguement on this one. It can only banish up to 2 monsters, gains strength at a moderate level, requires a sacrifice, has some decent protection, but isn't invisible. :3 Personally I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 20, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 [quote name='Cody Frost' timestamp='1311199512' post='5372663'] I don't think there's going to be an arguement on this one. It can only banish up to 2 monsters, gains strength at a moderate level, requires a sacrifice, has some decent protection, but isn't invisible. :3 Personally I like it. [/quote] Think of what happens when you synchro with this. Sense it would leave the field, it wouldn't and you'd still get the synchro monster. Now this isn't in the set but this add level eater are perfect for each other, no prizes on guessing why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Frost Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 That's a strange ruling...especially since I thought if a card that rejects leaving the field can't really be used for a Synchro Summon. IDK. A Synchro Summon would require two monsters being sent to the Graveyard and since the monster is not leaving the field, it's in a way rejecting being used for the Summon...New ruling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 20, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 [quote name='Cody Frost' timestamp='1311200001' post='5372681'] That's a strange ruling...especially since I thought if a card that rejects leaving the field can't really be used for a Synchro Summon. IDK. A Synchro Summon would require two monsters being sent to the Graveyard and since the monster is not leaving the field, it's in a way rejecting being used for the Summon...New ruling? [/quote] Yep, a new 1 would have to be made. Going to bump to cards so have a look if you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 23, 2011 Bumps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piercer of the Heavens Posted July 23, 2011 Report Share Posted July 23, 2011 The card is both good and bad in my opinion. Bad: Once during each turn if this card would leave the field it does not. So does that mean once per turn it can't be tributed whether for summon or card effect or am i just not understanding. Good:This card cannot be destroyed by battle. During each Standby Phase for each turn that this card is face-up on the field, increase it's ATK by 700. Once per turn, you can decrease this monsters level by 2, to banish 1 card your opponent controls. It can stay on the field and after a while i will become a beat stick. Its other effect is also good to being able to banish up to two cards. I kind of want to say that this card is OP but at the same time it isn't OP. So I'm going to say that overall it a good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 23, 2011 [quote name='Monkey Master' timestamp='1311396799' post='5379530'] The card is both good and bad in my opinion. Bad: Once during each turn if this card would leave the field it does not. [b]So does that mean once per turn it can't be tributed whether for summon or card effect or am i just not understanding.[/b] Good:This card cannot be destroyed by battle. During each Standby Phase for each turn that this card is face-up on the field, increase it's ATK by 700. Once per turn, you can decrease this monsters level by 2, to banish 1 card your opponent controls. It can stay on the field and after a while i will become a beat stick. Its other effect is also good to being able to banish up to two cards. I kind of want to say that this card is OP but at the same time it isn't OP. So I'm going to say that overall it a good card. [/quote] Well, I'll admit, there isn't really a ruling on that. Nor am I sure what the ruling would say. Because honestly, it could go either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Frost Posted July 24, 2011 Report Share Posted July 24, 2011 IDEA: Make the leave effect "If this card would leave the field by a card effect:" That way, you can still use it for Synchros/Fusions/Tributes! :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 [quote name='Cody Frost' timestamp='1311522843' post='5383170'] IDEA: Make the leave effect "If this card would leave the field by a card effect:" That way, you can still use it for Synchros/Fusions/Tributes! :3 [/quote] Well I could do that but I kinda like the confusion. At the very least though, I'll think about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 bumps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 bumps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 29, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 bumps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 Bumps :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.