Resident Fascist Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 [url="http://images.wikia.com/yugioh/images/d/df/Legendary_Six_Samurai.png"][img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110720083016/yugioh/images/thumb/d/df/Legendary_Six_Samurai.png/300px-Legendary_Six_Samurai.png[/img][/url] Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 They are stupid, autopilot, and not fun. End of thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 [quote name='Konoe A. Mercury' timestamp='1312135388' post='5402150'] They are stupid, autopilot, and not fun. End of thread. [/quote] Q4E Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 [quote name='Konoe A. Mercury' timestamp='1312135388' post='5402150'] They are stupid, autopilot, and not fun. End of thread. [/quote] Q4E Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 No matter how many times you claim that Six Sams are broken, and support the viewpoint that it was terrible for the game. I will still never take you seriously again. Shi En is still one of those cards you wonder what the R+D was thinking when they made it. With the LSS support, it can be dropped consistently on the first turn, even not taking cards like Gateway, which should be getting banned now because playing it only makes the deck insane, instead of just extremely consistent and powerful. Kizan is problematic, being an 1800 that can be dropped for next to nothing. You know, this is the fault of the player base, too. They always say that an archetype will become "good" when they get Tuners and Synchros. We look at Infernity. Oh look, Tuners and Synchros in TSHD. The deck gets broken. Granted, Infernity was because it took the handless theme and overpowered it by focusing so heavily on "dump and revive", but still. Six Samurai, already a formidable deck back in the day, gets a Tuner and a Synchro. And a lot of cards to Special Summon, too, but look, the deck's broken. Six Sams are too consistent, their main Synchro is too powerful for too little effort. If a Sam deck can't drop Shi En turn 1, they got unlucky. And Shi En is too powerful on its own, even if it didn't have that "Lose a different Sam instead" effect. Which I dont even know WHY it has that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vough Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 [quote]No matter how many times you claim that Six Sams are broken, and support the viewpoint that it was terrible for the game. I will still never take you seriously again. [/quote] you just listed a whole few paragraphs at how broken they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 [quote]you just listed a whole few paragraphs at how broken they are. [/quote] you don't get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 I don't give a s*** about the deck lol. Plants and T.G. >>>>>>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Six Samz 500 Posted August 1, 2011 Report Share Posted August 1, 2011 I actually run six samz and they're not as good as the plant synchro. i admit that they can just go off and be very broken but you cannot say that the plants dont. they do give another deck idea and make it more intresting rather than there just being tengu and debris variants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted August 1, 2011 Report Share Posted August 1, 2011 Powerful, yes. Hard to kill, sometimes, depending. A handful of the cards in that archetype banworthy, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.