MibeR Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center][img]http://i56.tinypic.com/34gubeg.jpg[/img][/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center]2 Level 4 DARK monsters[/center][/center] [center][center]once per either player's turn: You can detach 2 of this card's Xyz Materials; destroy 1 monster and 1 Spell/Trap Card on the field. This card losses 1000 ATK if it has no Xyz Materials.[/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center][spoiler='Alternate Version'][/center][/center] [center][center][IMG]http://i56.tinypic.com/amfbco.jpg[/IMG][/center][/center] [center][center] 2 Level 4 DARK monsters Once per either players's turn: You can detach 2 of this card's Xyz Materials; destroy 1 monster and 1 Spell/Trap Card on the field. Once per turn: Discard 1 card; attach 1 of your banished Level 4 DARK monster to this card as a Xyz Material. This card losses 1000 ATK if it has no Xyz Materials.[/center][/center] [center][center][/spoiler][/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center]Thoughts? and use lores [/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 All thanks to me ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 Yeah, sure ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nede Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 Umm... so you can't detach 1 huh, but when you activate its effect, you detach 2, then it's ATK immediately become 1100 because it has no XYZ Material. IMO it's a Good card but you have to be careful when you use it's effect, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 Indeed Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nede Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 IMO, just my opinion, higher the DEF and have this effect "While this card has no Xyz Materials, it is changed to Defense Position" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 Thank you for suggestion, i'll take that for consideration. for know, i'll leave it as it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAINTAIN GOD OF DUNDA MT. Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 It's funny that I posted my first XYZ on the same day XD ... I think it should be a Rank 3...It's kind of too underpowered for a Rank 4 in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 Level 3 makes Tour and Sangan laughs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAINTAIN GOD OF DUNDA MT. Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 [quote name='Syns' timestamp='1313326705' post='5441769'] Level 3 makes Tour and Sangan laughs. [/quote] Oh ya. True XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 added alternate version Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nede Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 Ok just forget my suggestion, that alternate version is great, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 thank you, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 yeah the alternate version is fine shame you made it lose 1000 atk though, won't be able to hold its own, kind of hoped you'd only make it lose like 700ish atk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlaceEx Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 its a good card but the wordings wrong and it loses 1000ATK? why? the alternate version gets a 10/10 the main 1 gets a 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 thank you, i'll consider the 700atk reduction. anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 that mean you'll now modify it to that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2011 Emh, if another says so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.