Zeaux Posted August 21, 2011 Report Share Posted August 21, 2011 [center][center][size=6]Ultima Golem[/size][/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center]EARTH / Rank 4 / Rock / Xyz / ATK 2000 / DEF 3000[/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center][img]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/4107/ultimagolemcpia.png[/img][/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center][i]2 Level 4 monsters This card cannot attack your opponent directly. When this card destroy a monster by battle: You can detach 1 Xyz material attached to this card; inflict damage to your opponent equal to the detached monster’s DEF and this card can attack once again in a row.[/i][/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted August 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Bump. Comment, peoples. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 well it's not going to set up OTK, so it's fine most monster def are lower than atk, so I don't see the burn being too much anyway (probably no more than 1500) so for this, I consider it balanced and you get 9.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enma Ai Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 It seems ok, but I would either lower its defense a little bit or make it 3 level 4 monsters to summon it. Also, for the effect, maybe make it half of the DEF as damage, seems a little OP'd right now. Just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted August 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Thanks, Rag and Dark Rose. I'll lower the DEF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KurashiDragon Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 2 Big shield Gardna and your looking at 5100 points of damage. This card can be evil depending on how it's used. In burn decks you can actually 1 turn kill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmgm529 Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Very balanced but not perfect. 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted August 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 I'll change the effect to inflict half damage or change it to 3 Level 4 monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KurashiDragon Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 [quote name='Zeaux' timestamp='1314036812' post='5462766'] I'll change the effect to inflict half damage or change it to 3 Level 4 monsters. [/quote] Half damage would be better. While the summoning conditions would be slightly worse the effect would be much greater in that it'll inflict even more damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted August 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Never thought about that. D: Half damage then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 There's no reason to change the effect damage to half. RC is just being dumb again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted August 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Maybe just lower the DEF or leave it like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 [quote name='Zeaux' timestamp='1314040975' post='5462943'] Maybe just lower the DEF or leave it like this? [/quote] It's fine as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Galvantula} Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 Make the burn once per turn, giving the opponent a chance to try and get back before being OTKed by this card. My rock Xyz deck could sure use this card. The only xyz that actually suits the theme is gem-knight pearl, but it's beatstick power is great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 [quote name='Evolution-Emperor' timestamp='1314099519' post='5463330'] Make the burn once per turn, giving the opponent a chance to try and get back before being OTKed by this card. My rock Xyz deck could sure use this card. The only xyz that actually suits the theme is gem-knight pearl, but it's beatstick power is great. [/quote] ...your opponent won't be OTK'd by this card. Come on, it only has 2000 ATK. Most meta decks can spam out 2000+ ATK monsters with ease. Face it, it's better off being used as stall than attacking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☼◄Firewolf►☼ Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 Very Good Card!:--) I Give You A 9.3/10.:--) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Galvantula} Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 @Power Play - I think resonance would do perfectly for having a high DEF monster for OTK. Pretty much either doing OTK or nearly all damage. Either way, this card is actually pretty good. 9/10 from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amatsu! Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 This card's effect is very good, but if there are other monster ready to attack, you can basically use Ultima Golem to destroy all the opponent's monsters and damage your opponent with its effect, and then make the other monsters attack your opponent directly. You can easily OTK with some devices (like, increase Ultima Golem's ATK in order to be sure to destroy monsters). Why don't you add a limitation that decrease the ATK of Ultima Golem when you detach a Xyz monster? For example, it startes from an ATK of 2300, and every time you detach a Xyz monster, Ultima Golem loses 200 points of ATK. It will be more difficult to destroy the monsters and activate its effect, IMHO. I suggest to lower the DEF a little bit (for only 2 Lv.4 monster its a colossus), to increase the number of the Xyz monsters required from 2 to 3 (so it can be more powerful), and to insert a sort of limitation in order to avoid an explicit OTK's effect. I give 8.5/10, keep up the good work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 Ugh, RC doesn't know a balanced card from a broken one. This card is fine as it is, as I've stated before, the meta usually doesn't run enough monsters that this card could easily destroy to make this card broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='Zeaux' timestamp='1314032305' post='5462563'] Thanks, Rag and Dark Rose. I'll lower the DEF. [/quote] still says 3000 def to me right now, Zeaux Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted August 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 I'll leave it with 3000 DEF. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aonon Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 good concept. its own effect doesn't get too unfair, as it burns itself out after only 2 times. I like. 9/10 when, oh when, will the site upgrade so we can make Xyz monsters normally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 There's no Synchronize being it has destroyed by battle monster with 3000 DEF, shoulda have more ATK, and low the DEF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted August 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='Aonon' timestamp='1314154872' post='5465026'] good concept. its own effect doesn't get too unfair, as it burns itself out after only 2 times. I like. 9/10 when, oh when, will the site upgrade so we can make Xyz monsters normally? [/quote] I really don't know. Sorry. :/ [quote name='Syns' timestamp='1314159904' post='5465159'] There's no Synchronize being it has destroyed by battle monster with 3000 DEF, shoulda have more ATK, and low the DEF [/quote] I understand what you said, but I don't see any problem with his stats and a little more ATK would make this card OP IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.