Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [url="http://images.wikia.com/yugioh/images/e/ee/BlazingDustExplosionDT12-JP-DNPR-DT.jpg"][img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110427071456/yugioh/images/thumb/e/ee/BlazingDustExplosionDT12-JP-DNPR-DT.jpg/300px-BlazingDustExplosionDT12-JP-DNPR-DT.jpg[/img][/url] [quote][url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Remove_from_play"][color="#0148c2"]Remove from play[/color][/url] all "[url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Laval"][color="#0148c2"]Laval[/color][/url]" monsters from your [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Graveyard"][color="#0148c2"]Graveyard[/color][/url]. [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Destroy"][color="#0148c2"]Destroy[/color][/url] cards on the [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Field"][color="#0148c2"]field[/color][/url], up to the number of monsters [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Removed_from_play"][color="#0148c2"]removed from play[/color][/url] by this [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Effect"][color="#0148c2"]effect[/color][/url].[/quote] Getting the ban-hammer? Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='Devil's Advocate' timestamp='1314214485' post='5465952'] Getting the ban-hammer? [/quote] doubt it....it's Archetype specific....and i doubt that even with this Lavals might not have that much of an effect on the meta dead early-game, ok mid-game, great late-game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 It's Duel Terminal. Any DT Archetype is instantly considered anti-meta for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumberCruncher Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 If Lavals were a good deck type, then I could see this doing something. As it is, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Terrible really. Not sure why you'd want to get rid of that beautiful Graveyard fodder. Especially in Lavals. Maybe teched at 1, but that's a maximum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='NumberCruncher' timestamp='1314215424' post='5465973'] If Lavals were a good deck type, then I could see this doing something. As it is, no. [/quote] Oooh.....if neg reps were back........ I love this card. It's not worth running @3 by any means, but I always run atleast 1 because it gets you out of a bind. Plus, banishing that Judgment Lord, nuke the field, then revive with Cannoneer isn't bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='OmegaWave' timestamp='1314215648' post='5465980'] I love this card. It's not worth running @3 by any means, but I always run atleast 1 because it gets you out of a bind. Plus, banishing that Judgment Lord, nuke the field, then revive with Cannoneer isn't bad. [/quote] Lavals need to rely on some other kind of milling power in order for them to be fully effective, like Lavalsworns (newly invented). Otherwise, they are too slow IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Lavalsworns are just bad =/ So monster-heavy and so inconsistent. Best way of running Lavals is Laval200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Lavals just suck. Flamvells are better. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 I will admit Flamvells are better because they have more support, but Lavals are meh. This card is just their Big Bang. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='Devil's Advocate' timestamp='1314216851' post='5466015'] I will admit Flamvells are better because they have more support, but Lavals are meh. This card is just their Big Bang. [/quote] ITT: Rekindling is more support. Lavals have FAAAAR more support. Flamvells are only good for Firedog and Magician, and Rekindling. Lavals have Magma Artillery, Lady of the Lake, Tender of the Volcano, Cannoneer, and all of their synchros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Flamvells ARE better because they can be teched pretty much everywhere and have great synergy with tons of stuff. Rekindling is more than enough support. But, it makes more sense to run both in one deck. You know, Laval200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 If it's FIRE and has 200 DEF it's good regardless of it being a Flamvell/Laval. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 There's not that many besides Flamvell/Laval monsters. Just Raging Flame Sprite, Fox Fire and other bad stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='ＨORUS' timestamp='1314218342' post='5466085'] If it's FIRE and has 200 DEF it's good regardless of it being a Flamvell/Laval. [/quote] @Cursed: i have a full list (so minor Ninja'd) Boost Warrior Decoy Dragon Gundari Raging Flame Sprite R-Genex Magma Fox Fire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Flamvell and Lavals included obv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Well, Gundari, no. Since you can't Special Summon it. R-Genex Magma is basically reviving a vanilla. Decoy Dragon, seems inconsistent with that engine. Boost Warrior, maybe. Raging Flame Sprite, eh. Fox Fire, eh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1314219356' post='5466121'] Well, Gundari, no. Since you can't Special Summon it. [/quote] *facepalm* forgot that it is a mothaf***ing spirit, i admit i may have made a slight mistake.....but yeah almost every FIRE non-Flamvell/Laval monster with 200 DEF is not that good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Fox Fire is only useful if you have Clear World, and even then, it's still useless. Who the hell runs Clear World decks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Fun fact: Just about ANY kind of dust is explosive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Run @1 in Laval200 for after you Rekindle. That's about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='Expelsword - ホープ' timestamp='1314220367' post='5466160'] Fun fact: Just about ANY kind of dust is explosive. [/quote] [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Tumbleweed_038_.jpg[/img] Not exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 That's a tumble weed... And it may not explode but it sure burns... Wait,,, now I get it. The dust isn't as much of an explosion as a huge fireball. But my point is still valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solemn Silver Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 What? This is terrible. iirc, don't you WANT Lavals in grave? >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 After testing. BRD > This Wouldn't run any Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.