Developous Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v421/Developous/yugi11.jpg[/img] Simple enough. It swaps out lv3 or lower monsters on your side of the field.... good for efficient deployment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimmepie Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 Where are you special summoning from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developous Posted October 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 hand. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimmepie Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 np Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 There's no Level 1 Warrior or Level 1 Spellcaster Tuner Monster in existence, implying that you would have to make one. =\ EDIT: Damn that Attack Gainer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCG warrior Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 Which of the 2 is a tuner, the spellcaster or the warrior? Also, a little OCG remark: was: any warrior + any spellcaster Once per turn, you may choose a 3* or lower level monster in play. return it to the hand. and special summon a 3* or lower level monster from your hand. should be: 1 Warrior-Type Tuner + 1 non-Tuner Spellcaster-Type monster Once per turn: You can target 1 level 3 or lower monster you control; return it to the hand and special summon 1 level 3 or lower monster from your hand. [quote name='Dante v. Nero' timestamp='1319223124' post='5591779'] There's no Level 1 Warrior or Level 1 Spellcaster Tuner Monster in existence, implying that you would have to make one. =\ EDIT: Damn that Attack Gainer. [/quote] there are level 1 tuners of both types already in existence; the warriors are: "Attack Gainer" and "Shien's Squire" and the spellcasters are: "effect veiler", "R-Genex Oracle", "Sunny Pixie" and "T.G. Cyber Magician" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 LOLWikia was proven wrong again. =\ Thank you for clarifying that, TCG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_armed_dragon_9898 Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCG warrior Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 [quote name='dark_armed_dragon_9898' timestamp='1319226185' post='5591842'] 1/10 [/quote] please also note why you think it's so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developous Posted October 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 ............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 you shouldn't have made it ANY lv3 or lower monster, make that more specific Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developous Posted October 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 There is an infinitely better version that lets you swap... or at least used to be. This is sorta minor, but works very well in a gravity bind deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1319229523' post='5591943'] you shouldn't have made it ANY lv3 or lower monster, make that more specific [/quote] Maybe YOU should just shut up with the "make it more specific" for once and make the card "more specific" yourself? I can see why [i]sometimes[/i] that style of criticism is good for the author of the card that's been critiqued, but since you spew this s*** on and on, this style of criticism is losing its meaning. The card is situational as it is, so it doesn't need to be specific. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1319229523' post='5591943'] you shouldn't have made it ANY lv3 or lower monster, make that more specific [/quote] [img]http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111021130004/yugioh/images/thumb/1/11/MarchTowardsRagnarokVG-TF06-JP.png/433px-MarchTowardsRagnarokVG-TF06-JP.png[/img] [b][size=8][font=verdana,geneva,sans-serif]MARCH TOWARDS RAGNAROK[/font][/size][/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunar Origins Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 I don't like this card. The summoning requirements require you to run bad cards, which really make getting this guy out stupidly inconsistent. Add that to the fact that his effect is next to worthless... It's pretty bad. Swapping out LV 3's isn't the best idea I've seen, but it's different. OCG: 5/10 Originality: 8/10 Picture: 2/10 Effect: 4/10 Total: 19/40 [ Bad ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developous Posted October 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 [quote name='Æther Royce' timestamp='1319232099' post='5592032'] Maybe YOU should just shut up with the "make it more specific" for once and make the card "more specific" yourself? I can see why [i]sometimes[/i] that style of criticism is good for the author of the card that's been critiqued, but since you spew this s*** on and on, this style of criticism is losing its meaning. The card is situational as it is, so it doesn't need to be specific. [/quote] PWNED. I agree with this statement. And lunar, about the card, its for a contest I have. [url="http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/266051-the-infinity-system/"]http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/266051-the-infinity-system/[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.