Kingdom Xathers Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111007022638/yugioh/images/2/28/MirrorGateLCGX-EN-UR-1E.jpg[/img] ... Anyone still believe *he* will be fired? Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 .detomorp tog yllautca eH .oN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 ?hcet ynnuf .ikuyR dna srediR deksaM era seOREH deksaM esuaceB "OREH" ot degnahc eb dluohS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Xathers Posted October 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 ... how many of you get the actual reference in the title...? And no, it is NOT a reference to the Verz. [yt]http://youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=US#/watch?v=2ppYcGB1eVw[/yt] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 [quote name='Alexander Abernathy' timestamp='1319653146' post='5601751'] ... how many of you get the actual reference in the title...? And no, it is NOT a reference to the Verz. [/quote] ...zreV eht ekil I tub ,wwA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 Please dont write backwards. It's a pain for people to read. Card was always meh. Tewart just doesn't understand how the card works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 Can we tar and feather Tewart? Sounds fun to me. Card's meh when done correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaouJudai Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 I don't think the professionals guiding the game actually play it irl. That presents a bit of a problem for them. Professionally I'm sure they do their jobs and do it well - but actual 'hands on' knowledge is missing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 [quote name='HaouJudai' timestamp='1319659746' post='5601867'] I don't think the professionals guiding the game actually play it irl. That presents a bit of a problem for them. Professionally I'm sure they do their jobs and do it well - but actual 'hands on' knowledge is missing. [/quote] That's a fair point. One reason we're so quick to point out his stupid comments is because we know better. But still, you'd think that before making public statements, he'd have verified either with R+D (Xyz rulings) or the official rulings for certain cards that now have new text (Mirror Gate). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted October 26, 2011 Report Share Posted October 26, 2011 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1319655460' post='5601791'] Please dont write backwards. It's a pain for people to read. [/quote] ?yhW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkaiser Posted October 27, 2011 Report Share Posted October 27, 2011 Isn't the ruling on this card that you keep the monster since they [i]both[/i] have to switch back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 27, 2011 Report Share Posted October 27, 2011 [quote name='ΩMEGA KAISER' timestamp='1319673753' post='5602223'] Isn't the ruling on this card that you keep the monster since they [i]both[/i] have to switch back? [/quote] That's the TEWART ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 27, 2011 Report Share Posted October 27, 2011 [quote name='ΩMEGA KAISER' timestamp='1319673753' post='5602223'] Isn't the ruling on this card that you keep the monster since they [i]both[/i] have to switch back? [/quote] The ACTUAL ruling is they switch back regardless of whether the other one died. Tewart just saw something in the word "both" that didn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkaiser Posted October 27, 2011 Report Share Posted October 27, 2011 What other card precedents disprove Tewart's ruling? Just take that to him to change his mind, if you're so inclined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 27, 2011 Report Share Posted October 27, 2011 [quote name='ΩMEGA KAISER' timestamp='1319686297' post='5602637'] What other card precedents disprove Tewart's ruling? Just take that to him to change his mind, if you're so inclined. [/quote] The ENTIRE HISTORY OF YU-GI-OH! VIDEO GAMES SINCE THIS WAS RELEASED + OCG RULINGS Tewart made the ruling on the new TCG wording, after years of it being OCG ruling. Basically, nothing changed, he just said it did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 27, 2011 Report Share Posted October 27, 2011 The previous ruling for it was on-par with the OCG. Tewart just read the next text, and said "both" meant something it didn't. We could complain that the Problem-Solving card text made it more confusing, because the original wording didn't have this problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.