Panda^.^ Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [img]http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/1239/287930m.jpg[/img] [Spoiler=Lore] This card is also treated as Warrior type monster. When this card is the only card you control; you can discard 2 cards and draw 1 card and destroy 1 card on the field. When this effect is activated, both players can 1.Special summon 1 level 4 or lower Spellcaster or Warrior monster 2.Add 1 Spellcaster or Warrior type monsters to your hand from your graveyard [/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FindingTheEverlight Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 I like this card, its nicely balanced, personally, I'd run this card. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 It doesn't even work as intended =/ It only works when it, itself, is the only card on the field... so it can only kill itself. The ability to be a warrior is just... why. Why make it more searchable? Doesn't say where it can be counted, so it's everywhere, iirc. The SS effect is from where, exactly? SPECIFY. Plus, WHY would I use an effect that benefits my opponent? And the eff with it just seems a bit out of the blue. Its only real pluses are it being a warrior, and its discard not being a cost- But that's stupid and sacky. The card lacks a lot of important details, and, frankly ,doesn't look worth it, tbh =/ And, I must ask- Why is an effect like this on a Searchable, 1900 beater? That is, assuming it was meant to be usable/powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 for the 1st effect you should have said lv4 or lower spellcaster or warrior type after all, that's what it's supporting, so why not? 2nd effect is much better for the adding to the hand, reasonably flexible I'm confused for the 1st sentence why didn't you just say it's ALSO treated as a warrior-type monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panda^.^ Posted November 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 ill fix thank you for ur opinionsit will look like this This card is also treated as Warrior type monster. When this card is the only card you control; you can discard 2 cards and draw 1 card and destroy 1 card on the field. When this effect is activated, both players can 1.Special summon 1 level 4 or lower Spellcaster or Warrior monster 2.Add 1 Spellcaster or Warrior type monsters to your hand from your graveyard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burningtramps Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 it's all right i guess 54 / 100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panda^.^ Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 out of 100? first ive ever seen in YCM EDIT btw if u know how to rate and want to u should have reasons to, not just to get post so u can get high level -___- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oh My Anubis! Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1322294202' post='5666548'] It doesn't even work as intended =/ It only works when it, itself, is the only card on the field... so it can only kill itself. The ability to be a warrior is just... why. Why make it more searchable? Doesn't say where it can be counted, so it's everywhere, iirc. The SS effect is from where, exactly? SPECIFY. Plus, WHY would I use an effect that benefits my opponent? And the eff with it just seems a bit out of the blue. Its only real pluses are it being a warrior, and its discard not being a cost- But that's stupid and sacky. The card lacks a lot of important details, and, frankly ,doesn't look worth it, tbh =/ And, I must ask- Why is an effect like this on a Searchable, 1900 beater? That is, assuming it was meant to be usable/powerful. [/quote] [quote name='Jack~`' timestamp='1322359930' post='5668380'] out of 100? first ive ever seen in YCM EDIT btw if u know how to rate and want to u should have reasons to, not just to get post so u can get high level -___- [/quote]^Both of these. 8.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panda^.^ Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 what???? anubis i didnt understand you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oh My Anubis! Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 I agree with both of the people I quoted and I give you a 8.2/10 on the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panda^.^ Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 oh ok thanks, anyway to improve this card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oh My Anubis! Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 [quote name='Jack~`' timestamp='1322421161' post='5669804'] oh ok thanks, anyway to improve this card? [/quote]I will give you a 10/10 wants you update it with what the people I quoted said. Very good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.