Valkyrus Posted January 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1327756710' post='5785244'] Whether something is good or not shouldn't be subjective. Honestly, take some criticism, and take some advice. If you want to have an ego, at least be able to back it up. [/quote] I always take criticism, but I fix the card only if I like what I'm being advised to do. I was wondering about Ieyasu's suggestion to add Continuous spell instead of Solidarity and I think I might do it. If people don't think it's OP'ed to add 3 Equip/Continnuous Spells to your hand that's awesome. I just thought it might be overpowered. I'm not changing it to once per turn though, it would defeat the initial purpose I had for it, and that's what I don't want to happen. > inb4 Kokonoe suggested the same thing well, actually, I never said her advice is bad, just that someone already said the same thing, so it doesn't really mean anything. [quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1327756727' post='5785245'] You're missing the point, as per usual. When more than 2 people already say that the card is bad and could use a boost, it's usually best to actually listen because those people are actually like, good at YGO etc. etc. And really, you're still on about Koko "stealing" your card when she clearly did not? [/quote] Oh please. The card had my image, my name, my stats and a barely changed effect. It was stolen. And then I was the one banned for it for 2 weeks, go figure. I had fixed my card's effect a couple of times after I originally posted it because of what people said about it, so it wasn't even my final version at the time she stole it. She could've made something similar and I wouldn't have cared. It's not that hard to find a different picture, think of a different name and a similar effect. But I guess for some people it must be. Anyways, edited the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 'Cept no one uses Equipped or Continuous spells. Field spells are for specific based decks and no Spellcaster-Type decks have one. So, it is mainly a restriction on your opponent with three Xyz Materials. Good job, I really like this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Ɽarity' timestamp='1327764954' post='5785376'] 'Cept no one uses Equipped or Continuous spells. Field spells are for specific based decks and no Spellcaster-Type decks have one. So, it is mainly a restriction on your opponent with three Xyz Materials. Good job, I really like this card. [/quote] Spellcasters don't have a specific Field Spell Card? Then who was Secret Village of the Spellcasters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1327767032' post='5785452'] Spellcasters don't have a specific Field Spell Card? Then who was Secret Village of the Spellcasters? [/quote]I have been proven wrong. Still doesn't change my opinion on the card though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 Creative and good are 2 different concepts that are not mutually exclusive. You can be creative and good. Try it sometime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted January 29, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='Ieyasu Tokugawa' timestamp='1327784960' post='5785979'] Creative and good are 2 different concepts that are not mutually exclusive. You can be creative and good. Try it sometime. [/quote] For a card to be really good means there's a limit to how creative you can be with it, because apparently the "good" cards on here are pretty much mostly cheap imitations/combinations of real cards. I sometimes end up making cards like that too but I tend to avoid it as much as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='Gandorator' timestamp='1327869366' post='5788090'] For a card to be really good means there's a limit to how creative you can be with it, [/quote] So? A creative cared that sucks in the meta isn't worth anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicktheholypet Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 How did you make an XYZ card and this card is 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted January 29, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='Ieyasu Tokugawa' timestamp='1327870010' post='5788114'] So? A creative cared that sucks in the meta isn't worth anything. [/quote] -____- well, no. I don't follow the meta much. I don't make cards for the meta, and I don't intend to. I make cards for fun and that are fun. Meant to be used in fun decks and casual play. Since, really, there's absolutely no reason to make cards for the meta. Because if you're making a card like that, what do you intend to do with it? Put it in your competitive deck and break the game or put it in a FUN deck and play casually with your friends (while actually giving them a chance to play too, instead of using some retarded FTK/OTK which is as fun for your opponent as watching paint dry.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 Why can't we put a card in a fun deck and break the game? It is possible. And why are you freaking out about breaking this then? How is giving more of a range to it's add effect making it less creative? I seriously can't follow your mindset here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted January 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 [quote name='Ieyasu Tokugawa' timestamp='1327879424' post='5788464'] Why can't we put a card in a fun deck and break the game? It is possible. And why are you freaking out about breaking this then? How is giving more of a range to it's add effect making it less creative? I seriously can't follow your mindset here. [/quote] It's just that everyone's talking about the meta and it ticks me. I'm not a metaplayer. and I did fix the card though, as you suggested? I just don't want to make it once per turn because it'd change it's initial purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 The once per turn was only because you seemed to be iffy. It's not needed at all. Spellcasters are an unsupported type, and the easiest lvl 4 spam they can do is Summoner Monk > Lvl 4, not exactly enough for this. There is no real need for any restrictions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.