WWECENA Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 hey guys here's my new card and i will do 1 more but not now maybe after i finish my work so plz comment and tell me what you think [img]http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/7444/104134.jpg[/img] effect: Once per turn, during your Main Phase you can choose and activate one of the following effects: 1: Look at all cards in your opponent's hand, if you do you cannot attack this turn. 2: Look at the top card of your opponent's Deck,if you do you cannot activate Spell or Trap cards this turn. 3: Look at all Set cards your opponent control, if you do your monsters cannot attack your opponent Life Point directly. here is the drawback and just a quick note about the first effect it's not permanent it's until the end of your turn cuz i know some people gonna say it's op actually you can still lose the duel even with this card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicktheholypet Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 put bullets instead of #'s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 What the heck this is absurd. I can look at my Opponent's hand once per turn? Are you shizzling me? For no cost? Heck, the first effect is way better than the other 2, infact effect 2 is the worst, Effect 3 still lets you attack monsters. It's absurdly broken. There's a reason Trap Dustshoot is limited. I know you can't use it on your Opponent's turn, but STILL. I mean, It doesn't remove their monsters, but that's not the main goal of dustshoot, it's to see all their plays and all their cards. There's a reason T2 dustshoot is devestating, and this takes 3 turns before you can use it, yes: But provided it's not removed you can see almost everything they have on every one of your turns and pretty much win from knowing everything they'll do. I know we are in a format with 3 MST and heavy, but that's no excuse. What on earth.... EDIT: What, I said this was quicker than dustshoot when it's not major derp moment darn it Icy I want to use my bad language here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='Order-Sol' timestamp='1327856781' post='5787438'] What the heck this is absurd. I can look at my Opponent's hand once per turn? Are you shizzling me? For no cost? Heck, the first effect is way better than the other 2, infact effect 2 is the worst, Effect 3 still lets you attack monsters. It's absurdly broken. There's a reason Trap Dustshoot is limited. I know you can't use it on your Opponent's turn, but STILL. I mean, It doesn't remove their monsters, but that's not the main goal of dustshoot, it's to see all their plays and all their cards. There's a reason T2 dustshoot is devestating, and this takes 3 turns before you can use it, yes: But provided it's not removed you can see almost everything they have on every one of your turns and pretty much win from knowing everything they'll do. I know we are in a format with 3 MST and heavy, but that's no excuse. What on earth.... EDIT: What, I said this was quicker than dustshoot when it's not major derp moment darn it Icy I want to use my bad language here [/quote] Ceremonial Bell, Shard. But, yes, it's broken. Not because of any of the individual effects, but you have all 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1327857471' post='5787471'] Ceremonial Bell, Shard. But, yes, it's broken. Not because of any of the individual effects, but you have all 3. [/quote] Ceremonial Bell is a 0/1850 Monster almost gaurenteed to die next turn oh, and you have to show your hand too. Your Point is? It's way easier to get Monster Destruction than S/T Destruction. I still think Effects 1 and 3 Make it completely absurd. All 3 effects just make it incredibly insane. Every deck can run this, and we'd go into a format where it'd become who can use Mind Reader's first effect to see their opponent's hand first and then start derping around with the effects until a player drawn an out to it. Oh, effect 2. "Oh look, I see my opponent has MST on the top of his deck! I should set 2 More backrow and try to bait it with chainables! Since I know he doesn't have storm I'm perfectly safe! Derp set everything!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWECENA Posted January 29, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='Order-Sol' timestamp='1327856781' post='5787438'] What the heck this is absurd. I can look at my Opponent's hand once per turn? Are you shizzling me? For no cost? Heck, the first effect is way better than the other 2, infact effect 2 is the worst, Effect 3 still lets you attack monsters. It's absurdly broken. There's a reason Trap Dustshoot is limited. I know you can't use it on your Opponent's turn, but STILL. I mean, It doesn't remove their monsters, but that's not the main goal of dustshoot, it's to see all their plays and all their cards. There's a reason T2 dustshoot is devestating, and this takes 3 turns before you can use it, yes: But provided it's not removed you can see almost everything they have on every one of your turns and pretty much win from knowing everything they'll do. I know we are in a format with 3 MST and heavy, but that's no excuse. What on earth.... EDIT: What, I said this was quicker than dustshoot when it's not major derp moment darn it Icy I want to use my bad language here [/quote] easy dude you talking like you never seen a card that make you see all card in your opponent hand or deck or even set card you could just said 3 word to me add a drawback and this is what i'm doing right now =_= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 WWECENA, why does does he need to "go easy"? He did nothing wrong and offered constructive criticism. And really, the card is still broken fyi. Oh no, you can't attack if you use the first effect, such a big drawback. :I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101100111000 Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='WWECENA' timestamp='1327858234' post='5787503'] easy dude you talking like you never seen a card that make you see all card in your opponent hand or deck or even set card you could just said 3 word to me add a drawback and this is what i'm doing right now =_= [/quote] The third effect is still quite... Ridiculous. You're basically checking just to make sure if you have to destroy those cards, or you can attack the monsters that are face-down. Pretty absurd. The second effect, well wait, what? If his next draw is a game-changing Trap Card, all you have to do is set Quick-Spells and Traps to destroy it during your opponent's turn, so it's just, bleh. First effect... Look at your opponent's hand... If it's a good hand, destroy with a card like Card Destruction, set some Spells and Traps, do any SSing you need, activate a ton of effects if you can... Attacking, by now, is nothing compared to everything else that can happen because o this effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 Its pretty bad lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='RAEGING DOGKING' timestamp='1327863136' post='5787753'] Its pretty bad lol. [/quote] I commented when it has no drawback and was nucking futs. so yea :-/ But still seeing all their hand is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 the 2nd and 3rd parts of the effect are fine the way they are for the 1st part though, I'd change it to just selecting ONE card in your opponent's hand, and your opponent has to reveal that card to you that should be enough, instead of the whole hand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101100111000 Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1327867130' post='5787963'] the 2nd and 3rd parts of the effect are fine the way they are [/quote] ...what? Looking at every set card your opponent controls is balanced? Since when? [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1327867130' post='5787963'] for the 1st part though, I'd change it to just selecting ONE card in your opponent's hand, and your opponent has to reveal that card to you [/quote] By far alot more reasonable than looking at your opponent's hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWECENA Posted January 29, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1327861480' post='5787696'] WWECENA, why does does he need to "go easy"? He did nothing wrong and offered constructive criticism. And really, the card is still broken fyi. Oh no, you can't attack if you use the first effect, such a big drawback. :I [/quote] i know he didn't do anything wrong he just talk alot about [size=4][font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Trap Dustshoot and all he have to say is just add a drawback but he can write anything he want all comment are welcome[/font][/size] [quote name='101100111000' timestamp='1327861698' post='5787701'] The third effect is still quite... Ridiculous. You're basically checking just to make sure if you have to destroy those cards, or you can attack the monsters that are face-down. Pretty absurd. The second effect, well wait, what? If his next draw is a game-changing Trap Card, all you have to do is set Quick-Spells and Traps to destroy it during your opponent's turn, so it's just, bleh. First effect... Look at your opponent's hand... If it's a good hand, destroy with a card like Card Destruction, set some Spells and Traps, do any SSing you need, activate a ton of effects if you can... Attacking, by now, is nothing compared to everything else that can happen because o this effect. [/quote] you talking like you got every card that can counter your opponent move when you activate this card you kidding me you say about the second effect all you have to do is set Quick-Spells and Traps to destroy it during your opponent's turn what happen if you don't have that card and actually there's only 3 card that can destroy this card and all of them are trap card the first one is simultaneous loss and drop off and drastic drop off so there is not spell card that can destroy this card and for the first effect what happen if you don't have card destruction there's nothing you can do about it so plz don't talk like you got every card that can counter your opponent next move in your hand [quote name='Order-Sol' timestamp='1327863192' post='5787758'] But still seeing all their hand is stupid. [/quote] that's your problem dude not my card problem i remember someone said that DNA surgery is stupid card that doesn't make it stupid just because he feel that way about it you say seeing all their hand is stupid other people may like to see what in your opponent hand so this is your problem [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1327867130' post='5787963'] the 2nd and 3rd parts of the effect are fine the way they are for the 1st part though, I'd change it to just selecting ONE card in your opponent's hand, and your opponent has to reveal that card to you that should be enough, instead of the whole hand [/quote] ragnarok your comments really make me happy good or bad comments it just make me feel good =_= and i will make it one card ok i was thinking about it anyway [quote name='101100111000' timestamp='1327868015' post='5788013'] ...what? Looking at every set card your opponent controls is balanced? Since when? By far alot more reasonable than looking at your opponent's hand. [/quote] are you kidding me since when since forever here is one card for you Odin's Eye it's basically my card without the second effect and with odin's eye i can see all card in my opponent hand and all set card on the field so plz plz don't talk like seeing all card in my opponent hand is op ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='101100111000' timestamp='1327868015' post='5788013'] ...what? Looking at every set card your opponent controls is balanced? Since when? By far alot more reasonable than looking at your opponent's hand. [/quote] All right, answer me this: how many face down cards do you USUALLY see an opponent sets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWECENA Posted January 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1327874930' post='5788344'] All right, answer me this: how many face down cards do you USUALLY see an opponent sets? [/quote] he actually think that [size=4][font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Looking at every set card is op omg [/font][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.