Squirrel Girl Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 Well, image from Valox Photobucket archive Card: [img]http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/3537/133082d.jpg[/img] Activate only when you you control 1 face-up "Dark Armed Dragon". Inflict damage to your opponent equal to double the original ATK of 1 "Dark Armed Dragon" you control. "Dark Armed Dragon" cannot attack the turn you used this effect and it is banished during your End Phase. Your opponent cannot activate card effects in response to this cards activation. CnC appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunn O))) Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 So, 5600 damage? You should only be able to use 1 per turn. You can OTK by using 2 of these. You could also decrease the damage to the original ATK instead of double. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [s]this card is too strong[/s]. This ard is OP'ed as hell (I misread it first and assumed it only inflicted 2800 damage) The only other card that inflicts a lot of damage for controlling a single monster is Inferno Fire Blast, and that's for a vanille :/ AND it doesn't inflict nowhere near as much damage as your card. Who cares if you can't attack. Use this, blow the field, summon something else, own your opponent. Also, making this immune to negation or being stopped only makes it worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='guuu1234' timestamp='1328050137' post='5792432'] [s]this card is too strong[/s]. This ard is OP'ed as hell (I misread it first and assumed it only inflicted 2800 damage) The only other card that inflicts a lot of damage for controlling a single monster is Inferno Fire Blast, and that's for a vanille :/ AND it doesn't inflict nowhere near as much damage as your card. Who cares if you can't attack. Use this, blow the field, summon something else, own your opponent. Also, making this immune to negation or being stopped only makes it worse. [/quote] It's terrible :-/ It requires Dark Arm... Which whilst easy to summon how often will you have THIS and Dark arm at the same time? Oh yes, let's just waste a card that wins me the game! Yay! Great use of deck space! Make it do something useful :-/ Like search Dark Arm or something. It's not exactly support when its [b][i]this [/i][/b]situational, waste of deck space to be quite honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 Honestly, it's impossible to make this card playable without making it broken. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 great, a 5600 burn right off the bat combined with the fact that your opponent can't negate this effect, this is WAY too easy OTK, even if you have just ONE such card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 LOL for people saying this card is OP'd. It would not even be played. It is sorta like a good version of Primal Seed, except for Dark Armed Dragon not Black Luster Soldier. it requires that you get out a hard to get out limited card. All this would do is guarantee that DaD would be limited for eternity. Oh yea, and it would also make some terribly inconsistent FTKs. You need 3 cards in hand (two of these one Dark Armed Dragon) and a way to get out Dark Armed Dragon, and you need to hope they dont warning Dark Armed Dragon. ALL OTHER DECKS WOULD HAVE NO USE FOR THIS CARD. (Not even diamond dude turbo) SO lets go over this: Useless in all decks that normally play DAD cuz it is 99% a dead draw and even when you get it off it is not god. Creates an FTK/OTK that is inconsistent and easily counters, but still has a 1/5 chance of getting a random win, possibly ruining a perfectly good decks chances of topping a tournament. So, far from OP'd, but terrible terrible OH SO TERRIBLE card design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1328051370' post='5792478'] combined with the fact that your opponent can't negate this effect, this is WAY too easy OTK, even if you have just ONE such card [/quote] Yeah, go on and copy what has already been said in this topic and somehow manage not to form a correct sentence of that. Either way, "way too easy OTK", sure, but it's still a bad card, ie too freaking situational to be any threat of a "way too easy OTK". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote]SO lets go over this: Useless in all decks that normally play DAD cuz it is 99% a dead draw and even when you get it off it is not god. Creates an FTK/OTK that is inconsistent and easily counters, but still has a 1/5 chance of getting a random win, possibly ruining a perfectly good decks chances of topping a tournament. So, far from OP'd, but terrible terrible OH SO TERRIBLE card design. [/quote] It's OP'ed for the effect. The situtaion makes it bad card design. An Extremly inconcistent card is no reason to make an effect that is as strong as you have. Oh and how is a 5600 burn not good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='guuu1234' timestamp='1328053652' post='5792592'] It's OP'ed for the effect. The situtaion makes it bad card design. An Extremly inconcistent card is no reason to make an effect that is as strong as you have. Oh and how is a 5600 burn not good? [/quote] Blah. The 5600 burn is good effect (OP'd) but the inconsistency use makes it UP'd, but still bad card design because it makes phuky FTKs. Ignoring the situation needed to use of a card... by that logic Dark Sage is super OP'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name='thekazu4u' timestamp='1328054382' post='5792615'] Blah. The 5600 burn is good effect (OP'd) but the inconsistency use makes it UP'd, but still bad card design because it makes phuky FTKs. [/quote] [size=4][size=4][size=4][size=4]Q4T Card's horribly bad but is bad design due to OTKs. I can see it printed because it relies on a hard-to-search limited card and probably wouldn't see play anyway.[/size][/size][/size][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name='Ieyasu Tokugawa' timestamp='1328054621' post='5792624'] Q4T Card's horribly bad but is bad design due to OTKs. I can see it printed because it relies on a hard-to-search limited card and probably wouldn't see play anyway. [/quote] This. Is what I was trying to say. But failing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.