Brandon Michael Geren Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Should be unlimited. This promotes one for one plays that help a good format. Additionally, it's better in skillful decks like Gladiator Beasts than less skillful decks like Wind-Ups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 It promotes a slower metagame. Which goddammit we could REALLY use right about now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Didn't we have a topic on this yesterday? Regardless, I would love a Book of Moon@3 format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 this realy should go up on the list as the format is too fast and having more of this around would slow down the format, however if that was to happen then they might have to ban Morphing Jar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 inb4 Empty Jar, expect it has already been discussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Morphing to 0, and we have the opportunity for this to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 Make worms and many other decks good again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted February 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 [quote name='Mu-12' timestamp='1328815106' post='5806468'] inb4 Empty Jar, expect it has already been discussed. [/quote] [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1328815151' post='5806473'] Morphing to 0, and we have the opportunity for this to happen. [/quote] You're both wrong. Read the Card Destruction topic. Look at the fact that Paul Cooper got top 4 with Empty Jar AFTER Book went to one. You're both wrong and undereducated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 [quote name='RobotBowtieOfDestruction' timestamp='1328815334' post='5806485'] You're both wrong. Read the Card Destruction topic. Look at the fact that Paul Cooper got top 4 with Empty Jar AFTER Book went to one. You're both wrong and undereducated. [/quote] he set monsters with A/D Changer, didnt he :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted February 9, 2012 Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 [quote name='RAEGING DOGKING' timestamp='1328815415' post='5806491'] he set monsters with A/D Changer, didnt he :/ [/quote] Holy s*** WTF. And I know about Card Destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted February 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2012 He didn't cheat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laskeri - Unmei no Senshi Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 This card is just too versatile to go to 3, honestly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='Laskeri - Unmei no Senshi' timestamp='1328842403' post='5807626'] This card is just too versatile to go to 3, honestly. [/quote] Sadly enough, this. I remember ragequitting a tournament because of Glad with 3 Judgment and 3 Book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='RyanAtlus' timestamp='1328874997' post='5808249'] Sadly enough, this. I remember ragequitting a tournament because of Glad with 3 Judgment and 3 Book. [/quote]3 Judgement. Yes. 3 BoM... no. It slowed you down. THAT is what makes it a card worth having @3. Something that gives Tier 2 decks a way to slow down decks like Inzektors or Wind-Ups and give themselves a chance to strike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 BoM @3 promotes an incredibly healthy metagame. Also, having 3 instant outs to Veiler is amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted February 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='RyanAtlus' timestamp='1328874997' post='5808249'] Sadly enough, this. I remember ragequitting a tournament because of Glad with 3 Judgment and 3 Book. [/quote] So, he skillfully outplayed you with a deck that's hard to play? [quote name='Wraith' timestamp='1328883018' post='5808344'] 3 Judgement. Yes. 3 BoM... no. It slowed you down. THAT is what makes it a card worth having @3. Something that gives Tier 2 decks a way to slow down decks like Inzektors or Wind-Ups and give themselves a chance to strike. [/quote] Exactly. Slowing down the game and getting rid of boss monsters and such is exactly what a good format should be about.[quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1328886248' post='5808411'] BoM @3 promotes an incredibly healthy metagame. Also, having 3 instant outs to Veiler is amazing. [/quote] Ran out of likes, but yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1328886248' post='5808411'] Also, having 3 instant outs to Veiler is amazing. [/quote]Well, assuming you can still change its battle position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='Wraith' timestamp='1328886488' post='5808417'] Well, assuming you can still change its battle position. [/quote] Well, if Veiler was still big and your "outs" to it are 3 BoMs you shouldn't be using cards that don't benefit from their effects after being set by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1328886603' post='5808419'] Well, if Veiler was still big and your "outs" to it are 3 BoMs you shouldn't be using cards that don't benefit from their effects after being set by it. [/quote]Liiiike? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='Wraith' timestamp='1328887029' post='5808433'] Liiiike? [/quote] Wind-Up Rat. Honestly, if you can't tell the cards that work well with it and the cards that don't then I don't see why you'd be arguing whatsoever in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted February 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Light and Darkness Dragon Totally trying Disaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plays4days Posted February 11, 2012 Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 lol @ people who play fiendish before they play this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted February 12, 2012 Report Share Posted February 12, 2012 I have huge doubts about this going to anything more than 1. Its too good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.