Resident Fascist Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [center][img]http://images.wikia.com/yugioh/images/8/80/HeavyStormDLG1-EN-R-UE.jpg[/img][/center] So, I got into this argument. He activated this, I chained COTH Targetting Sangan, [s]then chained Fiendish Chain targetting his Brionac.[/s] He said I couldn't, because apparently destroyed cards are negated. Anyway, discuss HEAVY f***ing STORM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 Should be put back at 0, and trunade gets limited again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted February 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='♠Toot♠' timestamp='1328890195' post='5808495'] Should be put back at 0, and trunade gets limited again. [/quote] No. Just no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='♠Toot♠' timestamp='1328890195' post='5808495'] Should be put back at 0, and trunade gets limited again. [/quote] Are you inept? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='~~Xiahou Dun~~' timestamp='1328890368' post='5808500'] Are you inept? [/quote]Nope... I just prefer trunade over this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='♠Toot♠' timestamp='1328890677' post='5808506'] Nope... I just prefer trunade over this [/quote] [img]http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/newsfeed/000/006/491/stop-posting-animated.gif?1311979054[/img] Unless you want to completely break the game of all it's skill, then go right ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='♠Toot♠' timestamp='1328890677' post='5808506'] Nope... I just prefer trunade over this [/quote] [img]http://f.images.memegenerator.net/instances/500x/14389717.jpg[/img] OT: Healthier than Giant Trunade, on a sick game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 I even have a quote of when Dark Hole was put to 1 and Olly wanted it banned and Byak said its good at 1 and then Olly went like "So you want Heavy Storm at 1 aswell?" or something but this is really good for the game and people dont set like 4 without being scared, tho with heavy gone blackwings would become so much better because unexpected delta crows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 [quote name='RAEGING DOGKING' timestamp='1328905068' post='5808767'] when Dark Hole was put to 1 and Olly wanted it banned and Byak said its good at 1 and then Olly went like "So you want Heavy Storm at 1 aswell?" [/quote]I'm not sure how relative this is to other card games but the impression I get is that Yu-Gi-Oh is a very fast changing game and for some reason I love that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted February 11, 2012 Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 Well, I think with Trunade and Heavy together in a format, Heavy is the better card. Trunade just became ridiculous when everyone set 4 backrow turn 1 when Heavy was gone. Anyways, I like the game much better with Heavy than without it, just my personal preference though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNo.101 S.H. Death Knight Posted February 11, 2012 Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 [quote name='Coffee Black' timestamp='1328928699' post='5809699'] Well, I think with Trunade and Heavy together in a format, Heavy is the better card. Trunade just became ridiculous when everyone set 4 backrow turn 1 when Heavy was gone. Anyways, I like the game much better with Heavy than without it, just my personal preference though [/quote] because of heavy Storm, ppl are resorted to set 1-2 at a time, which help up to deal with them in less number for a turn but of course same can be said to us and those sets can be useful yet a decoy to lure the heavy storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted February 11, 2012 Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 Heavy Storm has caused me to main 3 Dark Bribe in all of my Decks, plus side 3 Magic Jammer. /notreally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plays4days Posted February 11, 2012 Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 should go to 2 next format. I'm being serious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted February 11, 2012 Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 [quote name='♠Toot♠' timestamp='1328890195' post='5808495'] Should be put back at 0, and trunade gets limited again. [/quote] [quote name='♠Toot♠' timestamp='1328890677' post='5808506'] Nope... I just prefer trunade over this [/quote] This card has single-handedly made me more skillful, so no thanks. [quote name='RAEGING DOGKING' timestamp='1328905068' post='5808767'] I even have a quote of when Dark Hole was put to 1 and Olly wanted it banned and Byak said its good at 1 and then Olly went like "So you want Heavy Storm at 1 aswell?" or something but this is really good for the game and people dont set like 4 without being scared, tho with heavy gone blackwings would become so much better because unexpected delta crows [/quote] That's okay because Olly is bad and has bad ideas about banlists /w1 [quote name='plays4days' timestamp='1328930759' post='5809759'] should go to 2 next format. I'm being serious [/quote] Would rather have Dark Hole at 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.