TheAlchemist Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Sooooooooooooo...... here it is. [img]http://i.imgur.com/c1X5z.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 If you're going to give us a pile of random cards, at least have the courtesy to hit the sort button. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAlchemist Posted March 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Its a warrior deck. And dont ask me about the Magi Magi, its a christmas present, so i have to use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 I count 10 warriors, of which 2 I'm not even sure are warriors... Please, read the Deck Building FAQ, it might not be perfect but even Ragnarok1945 can build a better deck than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='TheAlchemist' timestamp='1331344432' post='5863804'] its a christmas present, so i have to use it. [/quote] My sweater that my grandma made was also a Christmas present. It's now on the laundry, ready to be used to mop the floor. OT: It's a warrior deck? What kind of theme is that? o.O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 ITT: Breaker is a Warrior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAlchemist Posted March 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Mu-12: Its mainly a OTK deck. And, i have been into yugioh for 5 years,, so yah, i have to. evilshit(sorry, chris XD): Im quoting this from a yugioh dueling manual 2012: Page 67, Article 2, chapter 1, definition 6: A warrior deck is a deck solely based on the dueling form of OTK. It can use any cards as long as they all focus on the one point: OTK. Atleast 16 regular deck warriors, 2 synchros, 1 XYZ, and 5 equip spells to be considered a complete and utter warrior deck. I have surpassed that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='TheAlchemist' timestamp='1331345020' post='5863826'] Mu-12: Its mainly a OTK deck. [/quote] Explain the OTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astolfo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [color=#000066][b]*Takes a look*[/b][/color] [color=#000066][b]WTF is this [i]holy pile of random, Batman![/i]?[/b][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='TheAlchemist' timestamp='1331345020' post='5863826'] evilshit(sorry, chris XD): Im quoting this from a yugioh dueling manual 2012. [/quote] Oh, so you want to try to insult me, when you want help? This won't get you anywhere. Also, lrn2BenKaiOTK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [img]http://files.sharenator.com/full_of_fuck_my_brain_is_RE_JELLY_BEAN_ATTACK-s328x246-177518.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Oh, and you spelt "Exactly" wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 I'm thinking this guy is a troll. If he isn't...well, I suggest, mr Alchemist, that you look at the deck building FAQ at the top of the Your Deck page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 This topic didnt last long before descending into idiocy. Stay on topic, avoid unnecessary insults, and...yeah, whatever else can be constructively involved with the Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAlchemist Posted March 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Otk is a deck that does the main type of winning: Making the opponent lose life points by doing *blank*. In this deck, its get 2+ extra deck guys and beat the sh*t out of them. Or if that fails: Get my scrap goblin out and a powerful monster. Problem solved. If that fails: Press my advantage. And, btw, guy that said batman, who i now hate so much cuz they used batman that i wont say their name, i killed batman last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Ninja Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='TheAlchemist' timestamp='1331346863' post='5863873'] Otk is a deck that does the main type of winning: Making the opponent lose life points by doing *blank*. In this deck, its get 2+ extra deck guys and beat the sh*t out of them. Or if that fails: Get my scrap goblin out and a powerful monster. Problem solved. If that fails: Press my advantage. And, btw, guy that said batman, who i now hate so much cuz they used batman that i wont say their name, i killed batman last week. [/quote] An OTK deck is a deck that wins in one turn (OTK = One Turn Kill) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 How does this work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='God Crouton!!!' timestamp='1331347270' post='5863879'] How does this work? [/quote] It doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1331347382' post='5863883'] It doesn't. [/quote] TC clearly has a different thought process from us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='God Crouton!!!' timestamp='1331347553' post='5863888'] TC clearly has a different thought process from us. [/quote] TC is clearly above even us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1331347637' post='5863893'] TC is clearly above even us. [/quote] Impossible. I am a God. ... Oh... This COULD be made into a Colossal Warrior Assault.dek if TC maxed Cyber Soldier, added Eccentric Boys, and Summoner's Arts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 [quote name='God Crouton!!!' timestamp='1331347854' post='5863898'] Impossible. I am a God. ... Oh... This COULD be made into a Colossal Warrior Assault.dek if TC maxed Cyber Soldier, added Eccentric Boys, and Summoner's Arts. [/quote] But if you are God, and I am the God of Gods, TC must be the God of God of Gods. All must kneel before his greatness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alice Moonflowyr Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 This deck makes no sense. Runs vanillas with no rabbit, runs pointless and bad cards, and doesnt even have a viable theme. Also, I think that guy stole part of my sig. I checked, and the theme in mine and his are word for word. And dot for dot. O.O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raine Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 The lack of Maha Vailo saddens me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 I get the feeling I ran into this deck on DN earlier. He played Gear Soldier, equipped Axe of Despair, and then rage-quit. Either way, how the hell did this deck topic get to 2 pages? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.