Jump to content

Wind-Up...Can the deck be viable without the loop?


Recommended Posts

Ok so I'm in love with the archtype (mostly for the card art) and I'm currently working on building it IRL (just need rabbits...if anyone has them pm me).

My question is this...is the deck just the loop or would it be still be playable at a competitive level when Konami eventually does something about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='NumberCruncher' timestamp='1331970133' post='5874553']
Unless they hit Zenmaity, Wind-ups should still function efficiently as a deck, and even if they do, Wind-Up Shark will still make the deck usable, if only in the same way Six Sams are usable.
[/quote]

Chances are they will put Zenmaity to one..so no more herp derp loop summons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1331997890' post='5874773']
You've got to be either naive or stupid to honestly think Wind-Ups are in no way viable.
[/quote]

or you just suck at detecting the most [i]obvious [/i]of trolls.

also it's called XyzSpamWindUps. Put the loop in there too and you have a hilariously stupid deck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Order-Sol' timestamp='1331997972' post='5874774']


or you just suck at detecting the most [i]obvious [/i]of trolls.

also it's called XyzSpamWindUps. Put the loop in there too and you have a hilariously stupid deck.
[/quote]

1. Irony is a cruel mistress.
2. You did read what I said right?
3. People do actually seem to think Wind-Ups aren't viable, with no good reason to think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1331998144' post='5874779']
1. Irony is a cruel mistress. [b]Yes, she is.[/b]
2. You did read what I said right?
3. People do actually seem to think Wind-Ups aren't viable, with no good reason to think so. [b]Because they're bad at yugioh.[/b]
[/quote]

Anyway, Wind-Up shark is an evil thing. Also windup boat is evil.

how will they go about hitting them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1331999919' post='5874819']
evilchris is the only person left with any sense around here.
[/quote]

It doesn't help when I'm confused.
I stated that Jack's post saying wind-ups where bad as a troll post because they're [i]obviously [/i]in the top 3 decks right now, and then ??? Would someone please explain to me what is going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Order-Sol' timestamp='1332000011' post='5874824']


It doesn't help when I'm confused.
I stated that Jack's post saying wind-ups where bad as a troll post because they're [i]obviously [/i]in the top 3 decks right now, and then ??? Would someone please explain to me what is going on?
[/quote]

You basically decided to defend Jack after I called him out when you were actually agreeing with me.

YCM needs to stop thinking Jack's flawless; He isn't. He can say things that aren't right sometimes. "Trolling" gets someone no where in this discussion, if he can't back up his claim then it holds no merit anyway, which most members on YCM need to understand. They'll blindly agree with what the "good" player say, without even trying to oppose their opinion, or question it in any way. Questioning, and being sceptical help you get better at this game, not just agreeing with the "pros". Oh and seeing as he isn't annoying anyone, since such a statement couldn't, it's a disprovable opinion, he isn't being a very good troll...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1332000511' post='5874830']
You basically decided to defend Jack after I called him out when you were actually agreeing with me.

YCM needs to stop thinking Jack's flawless; He isn't. He can say things that aren't right sometimes. "Trolling" gets someone no where in this discussion, if he can't back up his claim then it holds no merit anyway, which most members on YCM need to understand. They'll blindly agree with what the "good" player say, without even trying to oppose their opinion, or question it in any way. Questioning, and being sceptical help you get better at this game, not just agreeing with the "pros". Oh and seeing as he isn't annoying anyone, since such a statement couldn't, it's a disprovable opinion, he isn't being a very good troll...
[/quote]

Oh ok. I apologize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1331997890' post='5874773']
You've got to be either naive or stupid to honestly think Wind-Ups are in no way viable.
[/quote]
[quote name='Order-Sol' timestamp='1331999604' post='5874810']
no ._.
Jack's post was obvs trolling
[/quote]

Jack's definition of viable is different from yours. In an extremely competitive mindset, viable means something that will consistently place well at a YCS. Wind-Ups are not this.

He wasn't trolling at all.

Oh and the loop is hardly ever pulled off so yeah ofc the deck works without it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...