Agro Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Drilling_Construction_Heavy_Machinery:_Drill_Jumbo"][img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120217223030/yugioh/images/thumb/3/3c/DrillingConstructionHeavyMachineryDrillJumbo-GAOV-JP-SR.jpg/300px-DrillingConstructionHeavyMachineryDrillJumbo-GAOV-JP-SR.jpg[/img][/url] GADGETS Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 Drill-Jumbo the Jumbo-Drilling Heavy Machinery? GDI Konami. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahamut - Envoy of the End Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 This is actually half way reasonable. Don't like that potential name though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [quote name='Yuuichirou' timestamp='1334338293' post='5912412'] Drill-Jumbo the Jumbo-Drilling Heavy Machinery? GDI Konami.[/quote] And yet, most of the cards seen in ZeXal follow the same pattern..... As for the card itself, love the fact it boosts [i]every single Machine[/i] you control, rather then just itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted April 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 Oh, be nice, guys. The name's just fine. As for the card. UOGadgets seem like a cool move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 > Implying the previous name was any more sensible. naah. It's a cool Gadget tech, just for getting out Tiras and Volca. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110817015740/yugioh/images/1/16/MasteroftheFlamingDragonswordsGENF-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img] So why would I use this when I have something that's, y'know, searchable as well and doesn't rely on the present field? Sure, X, but eh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted April 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1334340591' post='5912454'] [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110817015740/yugioh/images/1/16/MasteroftheFlamingDragonswordsGENF-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img] So why would I use this when I have something that's, y'know, searchable as well and doesn't rely on the present field? Sure, X, but eh. [/quote]Because Jumbo Drill increases its own level...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 Master of the Flaming Dragonswords has no viable benefits over this. 1. The extra 300 ATK only helps run over Rai-Oh. 2. Rai-Oh screws Gadgets anyway. 3. This inflicts Piercing, which actually is seemingly more useful than 300 ATK here. 4. Jumbo increases its own Level. Helps against having to overextend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1334340695' post='5912457'] Because Jumbo Drill increases its own level...? [/quote] ... And? That's a horrible point. This allows you to increase at will. Why swarm with nothing but R5s when you could, y'know, swarm R4 and 5. At that, it's a terrible variant either way. There are enough good R4s.[quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1334340852' post='5912459'] Master of the Flaming Dragonswords has no viable benefits over this. 1. The extra 300 ATK only helps run over Rai-Oh. 2. Rai-Oh screws Gadgets anyway. 3. This inflicts Piercing, which actually is seemingly more useful than 300 ATK here. 4. Jumbo increases its own Level. Helps against having to overextend. [/quote] 1. Point 2 shows this is a bad argument 2. See Point 1 3. It's not once per turn, so you can have an up to 3000 beater OR Xyz material 4. This doesn't mean much at all. Instead it promotes overextending BEFORE summoning Drill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1334340950' post='5912460'] ... And? That's a horrible point. This allows you to increase at will. Why swarm with nothing but R5s when you could, y'know, swarm R4 and 5. At that, it's a terrible variant either way. There are enough good R4s. [/quote] Have existing field. Make Rank 4s you want. Summon this, make remaining monsters into Rank 5s. You now have Rank 4s AND Rank 5s. Problem solved. But, yes, it's bad either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted April 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 Wait a second. Drill IS searchable. Geargiganto X is a card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1334341794' post='5912472'] Wait a second. Drill IS searchable. Geargiganto X is a card. [/quote] [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1334340591' post='5912454'] So why would I use this when I have something that's, y'know, searchable as well and doesn't rely on the present field? Sure, X, but eh. [/quote] Your reading skills are unmatched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted April 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1334342102' post='5912476'] Your reading skills are unmatched. [/quote]Still better than your decisiveness. With X, there's no difference between the two. Cept one is a warrior and probably a dead draw in more cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1334342226' post='5912478'] Still better than your decisiveness. With X, there's no difference between the two. Cept one is a warrior and probably a dead draw in more cases. [/quote] And the fact that said one runs over Gadget's worst enemy. And the fact that your Gadgets have next to no lifespan without offering And the Xyz require outside sources for their summons And the deck is already sacky as hell So why are you adding EITHER to it? And how the hell would this NOT be a dead draw? Honestly, the arguments have all been completely one-sided, but if you took the time to think, anything you claim is bad for master is, le gasp, bad for this as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeal Ascendant Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1334341020' post='5912460'] 3. It's not once per turn, so you can have an up to 3000 beater OR Xyz material [/quote] Are you implying gadget actually run offering here? Sorry if I'm misunderstanding... :S But it's pretty bad anyway. It shouldn't have had that last clause... and for that, probably best as an odd tech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.