Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted April 21, 2012 Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120217223410/yugioh/images/thumb/6/69/LightrayGearfried-GAOV-JP-C.jpg/300px-LightrayGearfried-GAOV-JP-C.jpg[/img] [quote]Cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. Must be Special Summoned (from your hand) by having 5 or more LIGHT monsters with different names in your Graveyard, and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways. Once per turn, when a Spell?Trap card is activated while you control only Warrior-Type monsters: You can Banish 1 Warrior-Type monster from your Graveyard; negate the activation of that card and destroy it.[/quote] Okay, it's got to be one or the other. LIGHTs or Warriors? Not both. Then this card won't suck. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted April 21, 2012 Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 Solid Chaosworns is an interesting deck, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNo.101 S.H. Death Knight Posted April 21, 2012 Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 Tbh this card puzzle me of Because it need light monster for summoning but warrior for negating? It just raise too many questions about this card. P.S.: the only thing I love about this card is the art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted April 21, 2012 Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 [quote name='~Poker Face~' timestamp='1335049950' post='5921480'] Tbh this card puzzle me of Because it need light monster for summoning but warrior for negating? It just raise too many questions about this card. P.S.: the only thing I love about this card is the art. [/quote] It's not unusual really. I mean, take Frozen Fitzgerald. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted April 21, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 It's not even that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.