Wyvernstorm Posted July 11, 2012 Report Share Posted July 11, 2012 This card has strong effect to fight against a monster with high ATK monsters and some synchro, but its effect won't work against Xyz.. Still, it can be used as material for Xyz or Synchro summon, but that's not the point of its effect First thing first, just check it out.. [size=5][u][b]High End Champion[/b][/u][/size] [img]http://i.imgur.com/lTEtK.jpg[/img] [b]Lore:[/b] Once per turn: You can discard any number of card(s) from your Hand; this card gains 1 Level for each discarded card, until the End Phase. If this card attacks a monster whose Level is lower than this card's, destroy that monster without applying damage calculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted July 11, 2012 Report Share Posted July 11, 2012 Picture needs better backgr-*stabbed* [s]I got a little something to say: Dark Worlds + This: s*** just got serious and imba'd. If you don't know what I'm on about, go to the wikia and read the Dark World's effects. After that, come back to me.[/s] IGNORE WHATEVER I JUST SAID This card is Fabled Raven with more ATK, slightly harder to summon and a different second effect. Other than that, there's nothing to say about this really. Mostly because the destruction effect isn't all that useful and the first effect is already covered by Fabled Raven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted July 11, 2012 Report Share Posted July 11, 2012 [quote name='Dread☆プロイセン' timestamp='1342012028' post='5974008'] Dark Worlds + This: s*** just got serious and imba'd. If you don't know what I'm on about, go to the wikia and read the Dark World's effects. After that, come back to me. [/quote] Maybe you should learn the difference between costs and effects? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted July 11, 2012 Report Share Posted July 11, 2012 [quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1342013086' post='5974026'] Maybe you should learn the difference between costs and effects? [/quote] Wait, that counts as cost? SUNOVA- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyvernstorm Posted July 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2012 [quote name='Dread☆プロイセン' timestamp='1342012028' post='5974008'] Picture needs better backgr-*stabbed* [s]I got a little something to say: Dark Worlds + This: s*** just got serious and imba'd. If you don't know what I'm on about, go to the wikia and read the Dark World's effects. After that, come back to me.[/s] IGNORE WHATEVER I JUST SAID This card is Fabled Raven with more ATK, slightly harder to summon and a different second effect. Other than that, there's nothing to say about this really. Mostly because the destruction effect isn't all that useful and the first effect is already covered by Fabled Raven. [/quote] lulz yeah the background is soo boring, but i'm too lazy to photoshop it or search for another image lulz It has Fabled effect, but it's just a supporting effect for its second, i thought if i'm making the effect active in any "battles" can make this card OP'ed...ummm maybe not then So how if i make it to [i]"Once per turn[b][u], during either player's turn[/u][/b]: You can discard any number of card(s) from your Hand; this card gains 1 Level for each discarded card, until the End Phase. If this card [u][b]battles[/b][/u] a monster whose Level is lower than this card's, destroy that monster without applying damage calculation."[/i] See that, how's it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted July 11, 2012 Report Share Posted July 11, 2012 [quote name='Dread☆プロイセン' timestamp='1342012028' post='5974008'] This card is Fabled Raven with more ATK, slightly harder to summon and a different second effect. Other than that, there's nothing to say about this really. Mostly because the destruction effect isn't all that useful and the first effect is already covered by Fabled Raven. [/quote] Fabled Raven sucks. And you honestly cannot compare this to Fabled Raven as Fabled Raven and this card serve a completely different clause all together. Honestly, the card is fine. Nothing really wrong about it, had decent stats and a good destruction effect, albeit which is not that useful with Xyz's running rampant, but again, the effect isn't bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyvernstorm Posted July 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2012 [quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1342014583' post='5974041'] Fabled Raven sucks. And you honestly cannot compare this to Fabled Raven as Fabled Raven and this card serve a completely different clause all together.[/quote] True, its second effect is the point [quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1342014583' post='5974041'] Honestly, the card is fine. Nothing really wrong about it, had decent stats and a good destruction effect, albeit which is not that useful with Xyz's running rampant, but again, the effect isn't bad. [/quote] Definitely, when facing Xyzs which is very popular among [u]duelist[/u]s (term used by the old-timer) this card ain't that useful. Anyway thanks for leaving a solutive comment *shakehand* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.