-Doodle Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 [quote name='Chris' timestamp='1343940612' post='5995566'] Not like you have much to compare Destroyer to, if you're going with non-Jap art. A whopping 2 other cards. I'd say exactly what I've said so far again, but Cursed (.Rai) explained it better than I could, already, so just read what he said. [/quote] Well I'm talking about [i]how t[/i]hey are drawing, not [i]what[/i] they are drawing. I think we're arguing about different stuff here...Destroyer (which, again, I have no problem with it's art generally) fits YGO becuase of [i]what[/i] it is, and may doesn't fit becauseof [i]how[/i] it is drawn. And I guess Madolches are the same thing vice-versa. they're not monsters\fighters\magicians or something agressive like that but they do follow the japanese "pattern" of how they are drawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 What Japanese pattern? Anyone would think you're just using a preset bias to defend the way Madolche are drawn. It's simple, they don't fit Yugioh's style. My only point was that people hate this, but not them, when neither fit, and it seems completely stupid. Personally, I'm not a fan of the style they gave Madolche, but I don't waste my time complaining about it because it's nice to see some variety (I just b**** about how horribly designed they are) but there's no denying they're just as far (at least) from the general art style for yugioh than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 [quote name='-Doodle' timestamp='1343981441' post='5996111'] Well I'm talking about [i]how t[/i]hey are drawing, not [i]what[/i] they are drawing. I think we're arguing about different stuff here...Destroyer (which, again, I have no problem with it's art generally) fits YGO becuase of [i]what[/i] it is, and may doesn't fit becauseof [i]how[/i] it is drawn. And I guess Madolches are the same thing vice-versa. they're not monsters\fighters\magicians or something agressive like that but they do follow the japanese "pattern" of how they are drawn. [/quote] The only thing you can define about the way YGO art is drawn, simply because it's ridiculously diverse, is that it's mostly bad background + thing with a glow around it. It might as well have no way it's drawn anyway if it's just that. It's a welcome change. The only thing you can judge about YGO art is the theme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Doodle Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 [quote name='Chris' timestamp='1343996280' post='5996167'] What Japanese pattern? Anyone would think you're just using a preset bias to defend the way Madolche are drawn. It's simple, they don't fit Yugioh's style. My only point was that people hate this, but not them, when neither fit, and it seems completely stupid. Personally, I'm not a fan of the style they gave Madolche, but I don't waste my time complaining about it because it's nice to see some variety (I just b**** about how horribly designed they are) but there's no denying they're just as far (at least) from the general art style for yugioh than this. [/quote] By "Japanese pattern" I mean that you can clearly see that it was designed by artists that drew most of the other cards...with prophecy destroyer you can clearly see it's drawn in a differrent way, by different artist(s)... But I really don't want to continue this argument. It's very pointless becuase you either don't get what I say (I guess it's my lack of good english) or we have different prespective about these stuff. Also I'm not completley disagreeing with you I just wanted to show my opinions :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 We need more amazing artwork like Bite Shoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 [quote name='Grapha Demon Lord of Sexy' timestamp='1344036959' post='5996669'] We need more amazing artwork like Bite Shoes. [/quote] More like King of Yamimakai. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Since when is artwork a major discussion point over uses of the card? I bet it can go in some kind of idiotic Lightsworn Spellbook build though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 FFS, just because a card works from the grave doesn't mean you should make a LS variant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 [quote name='Chris' timestamp='1344039703' post='5996697'] FFS, just because a card works from the grave doesn't mean you should make a LS variant. [/quote] I did say it would be idiotic. Idiotic things are sometimes the more fun ones to test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 [quote name='Chris' timestamp='1344039703' post='5996697'] FFS, just because a card works from the grave doesn't mean you should make a LS variant. [/quote] [url="http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20101211003008/yugioh/images/thumb/f/f5/FabledSoulkiusHA03-EN-ScR-1E.jpg/300px-FabledSoulkiusHA03-EN-ScR-1E.jpg"]Does[/url] [url="http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100729211148/yugioh/images/thumb/1/14/FabledKushanoHA02-EN-SR-1E.jpg/300px-FabledKushanoHA02-EN-SR-1E.jpg"]so[/url]. Except, no, not at ALL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 It's more fun to just play it in the Turbo Spellbook build with Spellbook of Leadership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 [quote name='Chris' timestamp='1344040234' post='5996704'] Turbo Spellbook[/quote] And considering how fast Spellbooks fill your Grave.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranma1/2 Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 [quote name='Chris' timestamp='1343918436' post='5995317'] There's absolutely no problem with them experimenting with new art styles, especially good ones. Look at Madolche. I see very few people complaining about their art style, but it's one that barely fits Yugioh, where monsters are generally either pseudo-realistics or just plain monsters. Oh and... what's wrong with being like MTG in terms of art anyway? MTG's art is f***ing fantastic. [/quote] look at the naturias. they look like they were made for children. -.- and then look at the chaos dragons. see where i'm getting at here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 [quote name='ranma1/2' timestamp='1344041556' post='5996719'] look at the naturias. they look like they were made for children. -.- and then look at the chaos dragons. see where i'm getting at here? [/quote] idgi, you point of an archetype where some of the monsters are indeed exceptions to the general Yugioh artwork... Then compare them to Chaos Dragons that fit it perfectly. I don't get whether you're agreeing with me or not, honestly you can't say something that... uninformative without elaborating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranma1/2 Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 [quote name='Chris' timestamp='1344041655' post='5996721'] idgi, you point of an archetype where some of the monsters are indeed exceptions to the general Yugioh artwork... Then compare them to Chaos Dragons that fit it perfectly. [b]that's actually what i'm saying. the "grown-ups" get the better drawn cards because they are actually better (game-wise, not art. and some exceptions apply)[/b] I don't get whether you're agreeing with me or not, honestly you can't say something that... uninformative without elaborating. [/quote] and yeah, i'm agreeing with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.