Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Warnings simply gets you out of more situations. However, there are definitely situations where you would prefer Bottomless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Milenko Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 I honestly say run 'em both. They are both really usefull. But one over the other, I'd say Warning. But they are both good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranma1/2 Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 [quote name='Expelsword - 黎明' timestamp='1343748563' post='5993540'] Torrential Tribute [/quote] what he said. monsters less than 1500 stay for warning instead of being bottomless'd. warning takes up too much life points sometimes. sooo tribute all the way. don't get me wrong, i try to use all of them. if i run out of space and i had to choose between one, i'd do bottomless, and side warning. or vise versa, depending on the deck i'm against. it all comes down to the obvious; you choose based on what you're up against. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 Run Warning. Side Bottomless. If your opponent plays something like Gadgets for eexample, maining the Bottomless gives you dead draws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted August 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 [quote name='God Machismo!!!!!' timestamp='1344125208' post='5997611'] Run Warning. Side Bottomless. If your opponent plays something like Gadgets for eexample, maining the Bottomless gives you dead draws. [/quote] 1200-1400 beaters are not the problem with Gadgets. BTH should definitely be kept in against Gadgets IMO. It shuts down their Xyz plays (especially Gigant), and Fortress which is pretty much their win condition. Of course the obvious Skill Drain, Raioh, CyDra, and MSTs are sided in as well, but you can't have everything mained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasemeow Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 BTH is my personal favorite, but it has more cons than warning. In today's meta tho, bottomless is my preference. Not to mention bottomless versus dinorabbit is down right funny. That being said, i run 1 and 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranma1/2 Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 [quote name='Hasemeow' timestamp='1344129769' post='5997679'] BTH is my personal favorite, but it has more cons than warning. In today's meta tho, bottomless is my preference. Not to mention bottomless versus dinorabbit is down right funny. That being said, i run 1 and 1. [/quote] not 2 and 2? o.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasemeow Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 [quote name='ranma1/2' timestamp='1344130252' post='5997686'] not 2 and 2? o.o [/quote] I generally have other cards i need to run that make it to where i can't main 2 and 2. Sadly.... So the other 1 and 1 are in my side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Milenko Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 Really. I usually try to side bottemless and main warning. And yes, torential is obvously better. That's not the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 Warning is obviously better than BTH. Warning stops stuff like Dragonfly and it stops Stratos and such searching. Also Leviair exists. Obvs BTH is better in some situations like against Neos Alius, Blade Armor Ninja, Rabbit into Sabersaurus and Zenmaity but Warning is nearly always the card you would prefer to have. I run TT and actually 2 Fiendish Chain before I think about Bottomless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.