Jump to content

For my 2100th post...monsters with 2100 ATK! [Field Searchers]


Recommended Posts

Yay for me! You know the drill...
[img]http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110714004338/yugioh/images/thumb/6/67/Zeradias%2CHeraldofHeavenSDLS-EN-C-1E.jpg/300px-Zeradias%2CHeraldofHeavenSDLS-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img]
[img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111007013732/yugioh/images/thumb/6/6e/ElementalHEROCaptainGoldLCGX-EN-C-1E.png/300px-ElementalHEROCaptainGoldLCGX-EN-C-1E.png[/img]
[img]http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070527220733/yugioh/images/thumb/5/5c/ArchfiendGeneral-FOTB-EN-R-1E.jpg/300px-ArchfiendGeneral-FOTB-EN-R-1E.jpg[/img]

Discuss!

PS: GK Commander not here, he is slightly different from this trio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All three of these of which nobody uses! :D

Apparently in this format, nobody needs field spells except Gates to Dark World and... uh... I forget the other one. The point is, either (1), they make a searcher for a field in a deck that nobody uses, or (2) there's a good deck that doesn't need field spells. It disappoints me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're also forgetting Neo Space Pathfinder, Destroyersaurus, Warrior of Atlantis and Harpie Queen, which, along with Commandant, are technically better since they don't need the Field they search in order to survive on the field.

Still, like ranma said, it's a shame that Fields don't have much presence in this type of format, and those that do don't have Field Searchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Russell Taurus Oxford' timestamp='1344750173' post='6004789']
you're also forgetting Neo Space Pathfinder, Destroyersaurus, Warrior of Atlantis and Harpie Queen, which are technically better since they don't need the Field they search in order to survive on the field.
[/quote]
You realize he's mentioning only the ones that have the SAME 2100 ATK, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ranma1/2' timestamp='1344750156' post='6004788']
All three of these of which nobody uses! :D

Apparently in this format, nobody needs field spells except Gates to Dark World and... uh... I forget the other one. The point is, either (1), they make a searcher for a field in a deck that nobody uses, or (2) there's a good deck that doesn't need field spells. It disappoints me.
[/quote]

I use General and Zeraldas, or I used to before my decks were stolen. It still makes me sad when I think about it. :'(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Heavy Storm and MST get hit on Sep.2012 format. A backrow format would be nice, and fields would get play.

[quote name='ranma1/2' timestamp='1344750446' post='6004793']
...Why did you run those in your decks?
[/quote]

Those two helped a bit. Mainly because Terraforming can get cloggy if you already have the field out, and these work as beatsticks in that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ranma1/2' timestamp='1344750446' post='6004793']
...Why did you run those in your decks?
[/quote]

I ran an Archfiend and a Tarot Card deck. I rarely won with them but they were fun to play with and when I did win people were like O.o 'How did I loose to that?' It was so much fun XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Opa-Ayumu' timestamp='1344750860' post='6004801']
Those two helped a bit. Mainly because Terraforming can get cloggy if you already have the field out, and these work as beatsticks in that situation.
[/quote]
I hope we're talking several formats ago when those types of decks were "good", otherwise NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ranma1/2' timestamp='1344751034' post='6004805']
I hope we're talking several formats ago when those types of decks were "good", otherwise NO.
[/quote]

Or maybe it was just a fun deck. You have no right to be acting all high and mighty when clearly you're not good at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1344754360' post='6004834']


Or maybe it was just a fun deck. You have no right to be acting all high and mighty when clearly you're not good at all.
[/quote]
I'm acting "high and mighty"? What are you on? I'm serious.
Knowing how to make a deck even though I have my opinions on each card (opinions of which you guys disapprove) is called making an effort on getting better at the game. All I need is better reasons on why they prefer this over that. That's the reason I listen to Vengevine, because he seems to know more about the game than the rest of you guys.
The 3 cards on this thread are never used because it's not tier, point, blank, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...