Ritual Support - a (poor?) attempt to bring back use to old ritual monsters

[Iriq]

[url="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/59/sacrificialaltar.png/"][img]http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/3871/sacrificialaltar.png[/img][/url]

[spoiler=Effect]Tribute 1 Monster you control to activate this card. As long as this card remains face-up on the field, both players can Special Summon "Zera The Mant", "The Masked Beast" "Super War-Lion", "Skull Guardian" "Performance Of Sword" "Magician Of Black Chaos", "Javelin Beetle", "Garma Sword", "Hungry Burger", "Fortress Whale", "Fiend's Mirror", "Dokuorider", "Crab Turtle" or "Chakra" from their hand (ignoring the Summong conditions). During each player's Standby Phases, the turn player must Tribute a Monster, if he/she cannot, destroy this card.[/spoiler]


comments? suggestions?

[Sleepy]

Wouldn't it be easier to just say "non-Effect Ritual Monsters"?
After all, that would basically be all the old ones you want to support.


As for the card, I think it's too expensive.
I was hesitant on wether I would consider it or not, and then I realized the mantainance cost happens during every player's turn. Not even during your turn alone.
I suggest making it Tribute 1 monster when the card itself activates, and that's it. It's fair to me.

I'd say even make it a Field Spell Card so it becomes easier to get in the game.

[Iriq]

[quote name='Sleepy' timestamp='1354443003' post='6083075']
Wouldn't it be easier to just say "non-Effect Ritual Monsters"?
After all, that would basically be all the old ones you want to support.


As for the card, I think it's too expensive.
I was hesitant on wether I would consider it or not, and then I realized the mantainance cost happens during every player's turn. Not even during your turn alone.
I suggest making it Tribute 1 monster when the card itself activates, and that's it. It's fair to me.

I'd say even make it a Field Spell Card so it becomes easier to get in the game.
[/quote]

Wow, ok thanks for the feedback

I didnt realize all those mon's i listed were non-effect.
Thanks for the suggestions; I was worried it'd might be op'd.