Jump to content

ITT: I attempt Wind-Ups


Recommended Posts

[quote name='Saberzauls' timestamp='1354636010' post='6084967']
Hunter and Night Assailant are unnecessary. You want 3 Magician and perhaps run a Maxx "C" as well.
[/quote]

I would prefer not to dead draw Magician @3. Why on earth would you main Maxx C? I also like how Hunter is "unnecessary", since the Deck can still potentially hand-rape.

EDIT: Took out a Hunter for a Snowman. Probably not a great move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='みゆきサン' timestamp='1354636669' post='6084971']
I would prefer not to dead draw Magician @3. Why on earth would you main Maxx C? I also like how Hunter is "unnecessary", since the Deck can still potentially hand-rape.

EDIT: Took out a Hunter for a Snowman. Probably not a great move.
[/quote]

No wind-up players run Hunter any more. It is just a win more card really. The deck functions perfectly well without it and players would rather use their resources OTKing than discarding 2-3 cards from the opponent's hand. Snowman is a great card yeah but I also realized that you are not running Thunder King, so I would not run Night Assailant or Snowman (side Snowman) and run 2 Thunder King.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='みゆきサン' timestamp='1354636669' post='6084971']
I would prefer not to dead draw Magician @3. Why on earth would you main Maxx C? I also like how Hunter is "unnecessary", since the Deck can still potentially hand-rape.

EDIT: Took out a Hunter for a Snowman. Probably not a great move.
[/quote]

I can understand not running Magician at 3, but there's no reason not to main Maxx "C". It counters all sorts of things and generates even more pluses than the Deck does on its own, which is saying something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...