Exiro Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Dragon_KnightHow many times does your opponent use a 1for1 card? How many times do you get Sakuretsu'd? What would you do about it?Well, this is the card you're looking for! Another OCG-only card that really rocks hard! What do you guys think of it? EDIT: Ok, it was late when I posted it and I was tired and didn't read it well. The only MONSTERS that destroy cards on your field, can destroy more than one in the current meta. And it is more likely that your opponent just uses 1For1 spell cards or Trap cards to destroy your monsters. It is pretty handy when your opponent uses a monster to destroy 1 of your s/t, but when does that happen? Oh, and if he destroys more than one card with his s/t, he can't be special summoned either.On second thoughts, totally useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loren Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 yeah but you dont negate sakurastu's effet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 You can only activate the Special Summon effect when the card would be destroyed by a monster effect. So, it would work against Man-Eater Bug, or Breaker, but not against Sak. Armor. Still a pretty good card, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 It's supposed to be Anti-Sniper I believe xP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 yeah but you dont negate sakurastu's effet yes you do. the target is removed from the field, and Dragonic Knight takes its place. saku disappears. This card ain't so bad. better than some. not as good as others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 yeah but you dont negate sakurastu's effet yes you do. the target is removed from the field' date=' and Dragonic Knight takes its place. saku disappears. This card ain't so bad. better than some. not as good as others.[/quote'] Except Saku isn't a monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 yeah but you dont negate sakurastu's effet yes you do. the target is removed from the field' date=' and Dragonic Knight takes its place. saku disappears. This card ain't so bad. better than some. not as good as others.[/quote'] Except Saku isn't a monster.To help support Crab:When the effect of an opponent's monster activates to destroy 1 card on your side of the field, you can send that targeted card to the Graveyard to Special Summon this card from your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 Actually, against the most common monster removal, DAD and Snipe, this card is basically useless. Just dump another card/DARK, and D-Knight goes KA-BOOM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 Actually' date=' against the most common monster removal, DAD and Snipe, this card is basically useless. Just dump another card/DARK, and D-Knight goes KA-BOOM.[/quote']It would only be OKAY if you used it when your opponent was on their last card with DAD, or if they couldn't discard anymore for Snipe/misses him. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 Yeah, he just wastes one extra card. At least Yubel wastes two extra cards by summoning replacements. And Yubel is terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 If you have overextended to the extent that the opponent wastes all of his DARKs to destroy your field, then I guess you could use all the help you can get, but that is so unlikely that it might as well not have been mentioned. Snipe is a little more likely, what with the luck factor, but it is basically the same situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 If you have overextended to the extent that the opponent wastes all of his DARKs to destroy your field' date=' then I guess you could use all the help you can get, but that is so unlikely that it might as well not have been mentioned. Snipe is a little more likely, what with the luck factor, but it is basically the same situation.[/quote']Sometimes it's not overextending. Sometimes it's called swarming =O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 If you have overextended to the extent that the opponent wastes all of his DARKs to destroy your field' date=' then I guess you could use all the help you can get, but that is so unlikely that it might as well not have been mentioned. Snipe is a little more likely, what with the luck factor, but it is basically the same situation.[/quote']Sometimes it's not overextending. Sometimes it's called swarming =O Swarming becomes overextending the moment your opponent draws Vortex/Mirror/Torrential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 And it is only swarming if you plan to swing for game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 yeah but you dont negate sakurastu's effet yes you do. the target is removed from the field' date=' and Dragonic Knight takes its place. saku disappears. This card ain't so bad. better than some. not as good as others.[/quote'] Except Saku isn't a monster. hm. i didnt read the card thoroughly. i thought it was just any effect. and yet PikaPerson will give me a -1 rep when 2 other people mentioned Sakuretsu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RikotheFoxKid Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 yeah but you dont negate sakurastu's effet yes you do. the target is removed from the field' date=' and Dragonic Knight takes its place. saku disappears. This card ain't so bad. better than some. not as good as others.[/quote'] Except Saku isn't a monster. hm. i didnt read the card thoroughly. i thought it was just any effect. and yet PikaPerson will give me a -1 rep when 2 other people mentioned Sakuretsu. I see that as just cruel. You shouldn't be the only one getting a negrep. In fact, that shouldn't even cause you to get a negrep! You made an honest mistake! But based on the actual card, after looking at it, it isn't really that great... It could also let your opponent do some damage with snipe hunter if they discard malicious, dasher, or disk commander. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 Actually, there are a few monsters that destroy others without being able to do it multiple times. Like Exiled Force for example. But the most used ones can do it more than once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 and yet PikaPerson will give me a -1 rep when 2 other people mentioned Sakuretsu. Only the topic creator did, and he edited it to rectify his mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 and yet PikaPerson will give me a -1 rep when 2 other people mentioned Sakuretsu. Only the topic creator did' date=' and he edited it to rectify his mistake.[/quote'] What he said. lol win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RikotheFoxKid Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 and yet PikaPerson will give me a -1 rep when 2 other people mentioned Sakuretsu. Only the topic creator did' date=' and he edited it to rectify his mistake.[/quote'] and yet you don't negrep the creator. HORUS realized his mistake also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 I would like to point out that Negative Reputation shouldn't even exist. In the other forums I visit, deducting reputation points is a privilege granted only to moderators. And I think it is for good reason. I will use this thread as an example, it is easily and often abused. If the moderators think you are doing something unacceptable, an infraction is warranted. If a user has a problem, the post should be reported, or the user should PM a moderator. It would be nice to see such a change occur, but my hopes aren't particularly high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 12, 2008 Report Share Posted March 12, 2008 and yet PikaPerson will give me a -1 rep when 2 other people mentioned Sakuretsu. Only the topic creator did' date=' and he edited it to rectify his mistake.[/quote'] What he said. lol win. Win at being a complete douche. Is that really a win if its not against a small child? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted March 12, 2008 Report Share Posted March 12, 2008 and yet PikaPerson will give me a -1 rep when 2 other people mentioned Sakuretsu. Only the topic creator did' date=' and he edited it to rectify his mistake.[/quote'] so basically if someone makes a simple mistake and doesnt realize its only monster effects on a card, they deserve a bad reputation? try to remember who it was that allowed you back on this site by talking with moderators and administrators to get all of you that we banned back. we brought you back in, we can take you out again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 12, 2008 Report Share Posted March 12, 2008 so basically if someone makes a simple mistake and doesnt realize its only monster effects on a card' date=' they deserve a bad reputation? try to remember who it was that allowed you back on this site by talking with moderators and administrators to get all of you that we banned back. we brought you back in, we can take you out again.[/quote'] Nope. If someone is willing to purposely encourage the spread of misinformation, that deserves negative rep. Someone already corrected the TC's error of naming Saku. Then you came along and undid it. Hehe, I like your threats, however, I don't think that just "being from gamefaqs" is really a moddable offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted March 12, 2008 Report Share Posted March 12, 2008 so basically if someone makes a simple mistake and doesnt realize its only monster effects on a card' date=' they deserve a bad reputation? try to remember who it was that allowed you back on this site by talking with moderators and administrators to get all of you that we banned back. we brought you back in, we can take you out again.[/quote'] Nope. If someone is willing to purposely encourage the spread of misinformation, that deserves negative rep. Someone already corrected the TC's error of naming Saku. Then you came along and undid it. Hehe, I like your threats, however, I don't think that just "being from gamefaqs" is really a moddable offense. I was not encouraging the spread of misinformation. I made an error. That was not a threat. I was stating that I took time by appealing to the administrator to repeal your ban because I believed you were an intelligent person who, at first, came across as an ignorant jerk. It is now apparent to me that my initial judgment of you was correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.