宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Because I'm so damn pissed no one is looking at my threads so I took a page out of Zextra's topic naming book. That should grab viewers. If not, my next topic will be "NAKED PHOTOS OF ANGELINA JOLIE XXX". [spoiler=#Level4Effect #Pointless running gag] Destroy all Equip Spell cards equipped to this card. This card gains 400 ATK for each Warrior-type monster you control. Once per turn: You can return 1 card you control to its owner's hand. [/spoiler] Anyway, on to the card. It's not really anything special. I just saw the image in my folder and I made a card out of it in a few minutes. It's a shout-out to Command Knight with a bounce effect. Not really sure what it's for though. Maybe re-mapping Equip Cards or recycling. (lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.codex Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 I think you spelled the name wrong, shouldn't it be divine? Either way it isn't a divine, so hehe. But now lets look at this card shall we xDD I don't really like this, its not that it's broken, its just pretty awful, the only thing I like is it's returnable effect, which can be used by a Divine Mist build, even if you probably wouldn't as this isn't a WIND monster, but that might make it balanced? I don't know, but I do like the picture a lot, cute, but also scary D: I don't really get the whole "no Equips!" thing, I don't know if it has to do with like Noble Arms or something, I don't play them, but I think that's your reason maybe? 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted April 26, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 I think you spelled the name wrong, shouldn't it be divine? Either way it isn't a divine, so hehe. But now lets look at this card shall we xDD I don't really like this, its not that it's broken, its just pretty awful, the only thing I like is it's returnable effect, which can be used by a Divine Mist build, even if you probably wouldn't as this isn't a WIND monster, but that might make it balanced? I don't know, but I do like the picture a lot, cute, but also scary D: I don't really get the whole "no Equips!" thing, I don't know if it has to do with like Noble Arms or something, I don't play them, but I think that's your reason maybe? 7/10 You're not supposed to comment on the title. Well, returning a card to the hand for free is sometimes a really good effect. You can use it to fulfill costs, return unwanted traps/spells/monsters and place them somewhere else, it allows you to re-use once only effects more effectively than fetching it from the Banish/Grave and it just gives you hand advantage. As for the no equips thing, it's a shout-out to Gilfred (or however you spell that thing's name) and a bit of a balancing factor so you can't make it have a million ATK. Maybe I'll remove because it just looks out of place. EDIT: I wonder what happens if I take out the OPT (Once per turn) clause... Will it be pure insane or will it still the mostly the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.codex Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 You're not supposed to comment on the title. Well, returning a card to the hand for free is sometimes a really good effect. You can use it to fulfill costs, return unwanted traps/spells/monsters and place them somewhere else, it allows you to re-use once only effects more effectively than fetching it from the Banish/Grave and it just gives you hand advantage. As for the no equips thing, it's a shout-out to Gilfred (or however you spell that thing's name) and a bit of a balancing factor so you can't make it have a million ATK. Maybe I'll remove because it just looks out of place. EDIT: I wonder what happens if I take out the OPT (Once per turn) clause... Will it be pure insane or will it still the mostly the same? Oh, I didn't know you weren't suppose to comment on the title, sorry :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted April 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 Ultmiate divne bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkheezy68 Posted April 27, 2013 Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 This isn't the best of cards but then again I don't think that's what you intended when you made the card. Its 400 ATK gain eff for each warrior on the field can really make this card a threat with simply one other warrior on the field. Its bouncing eff can be useful in certain decks and its typing and attribute allow it some versatility. the only suggestion would be to lower it's def. With this monsters two useful effs, 2000 DEF is a bit much. Overall I like the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted April 30, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 30, 2013 This isn't the best of cards but then again I don't think that's what you intended when you made the card. Its 400 ATK gain eff for each warrior on the field can really make this card a threat with simply one other warrior on the field. Its bouncing eff can be useful in certain decks and its typing and attribute allow it some versatility. the only suggestion would be to lower it's def. With this monsters two useful effs, 2000 DEF is a bit much. Overall I like the card. DEF really doesn't matter unless it's a FLIP monster like that Snowman thing and GK Spy. Anyway, second ultimate divne bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted April 30, 2013 Report Share Posted April 30, 2013 Simply bouncing cards can be quite dangerous, as you can abuse Field Spells, Equip Spells and Continuous Spell/Traps, but this card isn't searchable beyond RoTA and Summoner Monk, so it's slow enough that it would probably take some effort to pull that off and create loops. It's main purpose will always be to create loops and abuse cards, so that makes it rather bad design... I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.