Cause Back Row: Madolche Nights & Tea Break

[D.A._Sakuyamon]

 & 

 

[Spoiler=Madolche Night Effect]

When a monster effect is activated, if you have no monsters in your Graveyard: Negate the activation, then if you control "Madolche Puddingcess", shuffle 1 random card from your opponent's hand into the Deck.

[/spoiler]

[Spoiler=Madolche tea Break Effect]

When a Spell/Trap Card is activated, if you have no monsters in your Graveyard: Negate the activation, and if you do, return it to the hand, then, if you control a face-up "Madolche Puddingcess", you can destroy 1 card your opponent controls.

[/spoiler]

 

Both are Counter Trap and both are technically generic. So what are your thoughts on them for the TCG Format?

[Maeriberii Haan]

Tea break is crap.

 

Nights is usable.

[Not-so-Radiant Arin]

Both rely on Puddingcess to be good, and even then, Tea Break is still crap.

[Miror B]

Both rely on Puddingcess to be good, and even then, Tea Break is still crap.

Well Nights is a Divine Wrath without a discard cost but a monsterless graveyard condition.

[玄魔の王]

The problem with Tea Time is if the spell/trap has no cost/condition, they'll simply play it again. You could combo with Degenerate Circuit if you really wanted, but that's a bad decision. Nights doesn't actualaly destroy the monster, but many monsters have OPT/cost effects so that's not as bad. However, untl Puddngcess has better support, they're both mediocre.