Jump to content

Attack Fusion


Philemon

Recommended Posts

Had an idea while reading something, it's a mix of Negate Attack and Superpolymerization, a Counter Trap Fusion. Art I found here.

 

 

[URL=http://imgur.com/9SWD4fC]9SWD4fC.jpg[/URL]

 

[spoiler='Attack Fusion']When a Monster is targeted for an attack: Negate the attack; then, you can Fusion Summon 1 Fusion Monster from your Extra Deck, using both monsters as Fusion Materials.[/spoiler]

 

I could see some fun using this with the Omni-HERO's, Gem-Knights, and DNA Surgery+Synchro Fusions.

 

EDIT: Updated to include suggestions on text.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I'd suggest the card to be able to activate in response to any player's attack. That way you could Creature Swap a monster and absorb back what you gave your opponent, which would benefit more situational Fusions than HERO cards and Gem-Knights.

 

Something about the effect kinda sounds unfair even though it's effect is not much more powerful than Sakuretsu at times.

I would personally not make it a Counter Trap either and would have the card target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I'd suggest the card to be able to activate in response to any player's attack. That way you could Creature Swap a monster and absorb back what you gave your opponent, which would benefit more situational Fusions than HERO cards and Gem-Knights.

 

Something about the effect kinda sounds unfair even though it's effect is not much more powerful than Sakuretsu at times.

I would personally not make it a Counter Trap either and would have the card target.

 

I like the first idea, but I'm not sure how to word it. Would something like this work: "When a player declares an attack on a Monster: Negate the Attack and Fusion Summon 1 Monster from your Extra Deck using both Monsters as Fusion-Material Monsters."?

 

I kinda want to keep it a Counter-Trap, because I want to invoke Superpoly without it's no-chain effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really sure how to ideally word that one, to be honest.

As long as it is understandable, I think you have some freedom on how to word it. After all, it's not a very common effect.

Maybe "when a monster is targeted for an attack" would suffice since only a monster can attack another, and it'd imply there are 2, but yeah, there's nothing set in stone for this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really sure how to ideally word that one, to be honest.

As long as it is understandable, I think you have some freedom on how to word it. After all, it's not a very common effect.

Maybe "when a monster is targeted for an attack" would suffice since only a monster can attack another, and it'd imply there are 2, but yeah, there's nothing set in stone for this one.

Yeah that might work too. 

"When a monster you control is targeted for an attack" if it is meant to only be usable during your opponent's turn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is better but I'm going to point out a few things. 

- You don't need the "activate only" part. This is what the : is used for in psct. Everything before the colon tells you when you can activate something.

- Don't capitalize the word after the semicolon (unless it usually would be).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...