Blake Posted June 6, 2014 Report Share Posted June 6, 2014 Let's discuss a funny side card that's had a bit of showing this format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted June 6, 2014 Report Share Posted June 6, 2014 The entirety of STBL suddenly got popular it seems. It's a slightly different Crow that you can Normal Summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enma Ai Posted June 7, 2014 Report Share Posted June 7, 2014 Very mediocre card. Only advantage it has over other cards that do the same this is that this is a small beatstick. Honestly, its only used mainly against Artifacts and Hands currently, possibly Shadolls in the future. D.D Crow, Dimensional Prison, and Debunk all do a better job than this card, AND they wont waste your normal summon. I dont see any good advantages this has over those cards I mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2014 Very mediocre card. Only advantage it has over other cards that do the same this is that this is a small beatstick. Honestly, its only used mainly against Artifacts and Hands currently, possibly Shadolls in the future. D.D Crow, Dimensional Prison, and Debunk all do a better job than this card, AND they wont waste your normal summon. I dont see any good advantages this has over those cards I mentioned.This can be Soul Charged and 1700 is a decent size in the current gamestate.D.D. Crow is usually worse in a matchup you'd side Meister into on the basis that it's useless beyond that one play and has no real use being drawn outside of that turn. Crow also doesn't stop the hands.Dimensional Prison isn't comparable so that just makes your post seem less credible.When it's used over Debunk it's due to the fact that both Wiretap, sometimes Seven Tools, and somewhat Trap Stun are common and murder it.I'm not saying Meister's strictly better or worse, just pointing out the flaws in your logic that in no way hold up.Though, it likely won't be usable as it is now in the future, due to the fact it shouldn't work in the Damage Step but TCG says it can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted June 7, 2014 Report Share Posted June 7, 2014 I thought things that negate are cool for the damage step? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted June 7, 2014 Report Share Posted June 7, 2014 Activation negation works in the Damage Step. Also, Crow can't stop Hands, can it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 7, 2014 Report Share Posted June 7, 2014 Activation negation works in the Damage Step. This doesn't negate the activation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_engineer Posted June 7, 2014 Report Share Posted June 7, 2014 I see this card as a more expensive, but easier to use Abyss Dweller, it's not that bad but Dweller negates the whole graveyard (STBL best expansione evur) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
%phil Posted June 7, 2014 Report Share Posted June 7, 2014 it has the potential to be hilariously expensive if it's commonly played due to it being a secret from one of the rarest sets ever. it's a trade-off between it and crow b/c crow is better in certain matchups e.g. rulers however this has an actual presence as well as being a hand-trap as well as being better vs stuff which triggers in grave but doesn't involve itself e.g. hands. it's silly to compare it to dweller because one is a rank-4 xys and one is a hand trap, it's like comparing abyssgaios to effect veiler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 8, 2014 Report Share Posted June 8, 2014 I see this card as a more expensive, but easier to use Abyss Dweller, it's not that bad but Dweller negates the whole graveyard (STBL best expansione evur) Dweller doesn't "negate" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_engineer Posted June 9, 2014 Report Share Posted June 9, 2014 Dweller doesn't "negate" It prevents the activations, i know, but i commonly say "negate" since the effect on the game is the same (or not?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 9, 2014 Report Share Posted June 9, 2014 It prevents the activations, i know, but i commonly say "negate" since the effect on the game is the same (or not?) It's not. Negate implies the effect still activates, but the effect never activates so it never takes up a chain link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_engineer Posted June 9, 2014 Report Share Posted June 9, 2014 It's not. Negate implies the effect still activates, but the effect never activates so it never takes up a chain link. Oh well, good to know dat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted June 10, 2014 Report Share Posted June 10, 2014 I dunno why, but I always thought this has 0 Def. Oh well. Still too expensive (money wise) for what it does. Guess that is to be expected from a card from Starstrike Blast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
%phil Posted June 10, 2014 Report Share Posted June 10, 2014 Still too expensive (money wise) for what it does. what is the logic behind this argument Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2014 what is the logic behind this argument Bad players that think money has bearing on how good a card is objectively Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted June 10, 2014 Report Share Posted June 10, 2014 This works in the Damage Step, right? If so, I might actually consider it in some decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2014 This works in the Damage Step, right? If so, I might actually consider it in some decks. It does at present, yes. However, it should not, so it will probably be ruled differently in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 11, 2014 Report Share Posted June 11, 2014 This works in the Damage Step, right? If so, I might actually consider it in some decks. It SHOULD be like Bujingi Turtle. But old rulings apply as this isn't PSCT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.