Jump to content

Divine Cards


qweasdzxc123

Recommended Posts

level 4's don't have 3000 atk. ever. I think by chains he means like chains of effect. you know like there are cards that can only be activated as chain link 4 or higher. that kind of thing. effect is super op. i mean seriously. wow. i cannot think of a more op card except insta- wins and most alt- wins people here make. I think what he means is something like this in ocg: "You may only activate this cards effect as chain link X or higher." at least for the first part. why you would use any more than 2 monsters to summon this is beyond me. one use on your turn when your opponent counters an effect and boom. you basically win.  also hero isn't an accepted type. you mean warrior. also, this pic is from a number card. nice pic stealing dude. how is this evilswarm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "Once per chain" thing is actually legit OCG and is used on Evilswarm Exciton Knight. It means you can do it more than once per turn, but you can't chain it to something twice in the same chain. Like if I activate Exciton's effect and he chains Breakthrough Skill, I can't chain Exciton again.

 

Anyway, unless you're a troll, read the guides to card making and perhaps check out the Tutoring Project (or PM me since I'm a tutor there). Cards like this belong in Any Other Cards, not RC. You need Types that actually exist and using Divine Attribute is frowned upon round here. You also need to learn how to balance a card properly so that it wouldn't be insta-banned in the real game. This is "realistic" cards, after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Card's picture is already that of Number 86: Heroic Champion Rhongomiant (sorry if I spelled it wrong), it's using a Fake Type/DIVINE Attribute and essentially is a banishing version of 86's 5-mat effect.

 

The card is horribly OPed, as it's a generic 2-mat Rank 4 monster with 3000 ATK/3000 DEF (both of which are either seen on higher Rank monsters and/or monsters with sufficient drawbacks [requirement of more materials, a negative effect as seen with #30]). What's more; it's also a free field wipe towards your opponent.

 

As Saber mentioned, this section is for serious and realistic cards, not for troll or blatantly OPed ones. This has absolutely no relation to Evilswarms whatsoever, let alone Knight.

You need to read the guides that are stickied in here, because they set the standard for what we expect here in RC. It's advised that you use the Tutoring Project that's also stickied here (or PM Saber or myself, since both of us are tutors in it), so that you can learn how to make cards that are appropriate for this section. Better that you get told this now than find out the hard way in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it should be warrior, not hero. hero is not an accepted type. the effect is horribly over powered and to be honest this card would only get two xyz materials because once you use his effect it's basically game. also, you have one more stolen art this time off of Contrast HERO Chaos. do you take us for idiots? cause it kinda feels like that's how you see us. this card would never ever in all of time be real. sorry, but it just wouldn't. 

 

The card is horribly OPed, as it's a generic 2-mat Rank 4 monster with 5000 ATK/5000 DEF (both of which are either seen on higher Rank monsters and/or monsters with sufficient drawbacks [requirement of more materials, a negative effect as seen with #30]). What's more; it's also a free field wipe towards your opponent.

 

As Saber mentioned, this section is for serious and realistic cards, not for troll or blatantly OPed ones. It's advised that you use the Tutoring Project that's also stickied here (or PM Saber or myself, since both of us are tutors in it), so that you can learn how to make cards that are appropriate for this section. Better that you get told this now than find out the hard way in the future.

yep quoted sakura. i even edited it to be more fitting towards this version, i.e. i raised the atk and def amount stated and removed saying that it has no relation to evilswarm because i'm not sure if it does or not and i'm not willing to do the research to find out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...