Chiz Fri Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 Equip only to a Level 4 or lower Fairy-Type monster. The equipped monster is unaffected by other Spell and Trap cards, and your opponent's monster effects. [spoiler='EDITS']EDIT 10/5/14: Changed the effect to only equip to Level 4 or lower monsters, and not negate itself.[/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fritzcat12 Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 I like this card. it's like dragon shield but less OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im the prince of the ring! Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 One small problem here. It says that the equipped monster is unaffected by spell/traps. You know what that measns? It means that it's also unaffected by the equip card, making the effect useless. Change the effect so that it's unaffected by other spell/trap cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted October 5, 2014 Report Share Posted October 5, 2014 As above user mentioned, this card's effect contradicts itself to an extent [if equipped monster can't be affected by S/T, it stops itself]. You need to fix that, so it doesn't cause a loop like that. Going away from that, it's helpful for one of your Fairies to do what it needs to be doing w/out worrying about the opponent Mirror Forcing or Exciton/101/BRD or whatever; until your opponent either pops it with general S/T removal or they kill it in battle. But yeah, it's pushing for abuse with Archlords and a bunch of other boss Fairies. Maybe restrict it to Level 4 or lower stuff. I like this card. it's like dragon shield but less OP. How exactly is this card less OPed than Dragon Shield? If you're going to say that, at least provide some facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted October 5, 2014 Report Share Posted October 5, 2014 A total protection for no cost or any form of negative effect at all? This has Melodious abuse all of it, they already have card that prevent destruction, now they have something that only MST can take care of as well. That's...not really something I welcome. It also makes bosses that much harder to actually get rid of, equip this to Herald of Perfection and watch your opponent scream. The only balanced thing here is that it prevent your own Spell/Trap Cards from affecting it, though your monster effects are still fine, so I say it again, Melodious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oriannis Posted October 5, 2014 Report Share Posted October 5, 2014 I agree with Zaziuma. This level of immunity is just screaming for abuse. A herald deck would much harder to deal with. Archlord krista would become too strong. Unfortunately this is a case of an interesting card being surrounded by Konami's cards that would abuse the living hell out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiz Fri Posted October 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2014 Okay, I added the suggestions everyone made. How abusable is it now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted October 6, 2014 Report Share Posted October 6, 2014 Still seems a bit powerful to me...like one of the "forbidden" spells, except the protection lasts more than one turn, and there's no drawback. Imo, you should make it either monsters or spells/traps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinkenFlo Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 Just having this on krystia...made me cry just by thinking about it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiz Fri Posted October 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 Just having this on krystia...made me cry just by thinking about it... Krystia's level is too high to use this card on her. I edited the card to only effect L4 or lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.