Slinky Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 Neither player can Special Summon monsters. When a card is sentfrom the Deck or the field to your Graveyard: Destroy this card. Well deserved reprint. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 Time to put my Vanity's on ebay since it's legit confirmed now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 Where are the code and edition? Also, there is kinda of a page for it, but I can see why you would make a new one. I feel this really needs to hit 1 or 0. Or maybe DN is shit and just keeps giving it to player's opening hands just to piss me off. Still, there are a lot of ways to stop this from blowing up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 One one hand, I'd love this to be at 1 or 0 due to being the new age Oppression. Though, the utter fuck you to the top decks that this card can give is pretty irreplaceable, probably. Also, is it just me, or this is evolving into staple at 3 mained in most tournament decks as of late? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted October 9, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 Where are the code and edition? Also, there is kinda of a page for it, but I can see why you would make a new one. I feel this really needs to hit 1 or 0. Or maybe DN is s*** and just keeps giving it to player's opening hands just to piss me off. Still, there are a lot of ways to stop this from blowing up. Official proxy's don't have them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 Official proxies don't have them. What if he was being sarcastic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 What if he was being sarcastic? I was sorta being sarcastic, but it was also a legit question. =P I haven't seen this being played 3 of yet, but that's because duels last long enough to verify how many they run. 2 is the minimum, three might not hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 I was sorta being sarcastic, but it was also a legit question. =P Fair. I didn't want to answer you because I didn't want to look like an idiot if you said "I was being sarcastic" in response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 3 might be pretty okay to run in something suitable like Bujins and Fire Fists, where the salt level would be most highest with Vanity. Vanity nowadays is such a trolly card that can stop a could number of top tier decks for a while that people really just had to consider maindecking in a bunch of possible stuff. I really don't get people using it in decks like Shaddoll and Burning Abyss cause you're much prone to having it destroyed right away and/orit might be counterproductive. Even if it cripples once very effectively I'd just side it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 3 might be pretty okay to run in something suitable like Bujins and Fire Fists, where the salt level would be most highest with Vanity. Vanity nowadays is such a trolly card that can stop a could number of top tier decks for a while that people really just had to consider maindecking in a bunch of possible stuff. I really don't get people using it in decks like Shaddoll and Burning Abyss cause you're much prone to having it destroyed right away and/orit might be counterproductive. Even if it cripples once very effectively I'd just side it. that's actually half the point, they can remove it themselves to allow them to special summon after locking their opponent's turn down, allowing them to gain a stronger foothold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 The more I play against it, the more it resembles Royal Oppression from back in the day. I mean, it does exactly the same thing. "I did my stuff already? Ok, now you're not able to". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted October 9, 2014 Report Share Posted October 9, 2014 The more I play against it, the more it resembles Royal Oppression from back in the day. I mean, it does exactly the same thing. "I did my stuff already? Ok, now you're not able to". except this one has an off switch so it doesn't effect your own plays. "okay, you did shit for nothing last turn? good, upstart golbin, and now I play another massive beast to otk you with my setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadenxAtemYAOI Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 If only Black Garden, King Tiger Wanghu, Denkou Sekka, and Anti-Spell gragrance were consistent with one another. I would have a crap lock then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.