Premier Alexander Romanov Posted January 9, 2015 Report Share Posted January 9, 2015 LIGHT/Wyrm/Xyz/Effet/Rank 5/2700 ATK/2000 DEF 3 or more Level 5 LIGHT monsters During your Main Phase 2, you can also Xyz Summon this card by using a "tellarknight" Xyz Monster you control as the Xyz Material, except "Stellarknight Constellar Diamond". (Xyz Materials attached to that monster also become Xyz Materials on this card.) While this card has Xyz Material, neither player can send cards from the Deck to the Graveyard, and any cards that returns from the Graveyard to the hand is banished instead. During either player's turn, when an opponent's DARK monster activates its effect: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; negate that activation, and if you do, destroy it. Really, Konami? That was a clever name, and you ruined it. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted January 9, 2015 Report Share Posted January 9, 2015 The TCG probably didn't want to confuse people by having 2 archetype names in the same word. Which is a slight shame, because Constellarknight works so well. The name kind of sounds awkward as "Stellarknight Constellar", but it could be worse. It could have been "Constellar Stellarknight". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VampireofDarkness Posted January 9, 2015 Report Share Posted January 9, 2015 The TCG probably didn't want to confuse people by having 2 archetype names in the same word. Which is a slight shame, because Constellarknight works so well. The name kind of sounds awkward as "Stellarknight Constellar", but it could be worse. It could have been "Constellar Stellarknight". It's indeed a shame, but I'll assume there are Constellar support cards that would work with this card, so they probably clarified for such. However, I still don't see that Deck playing this anytime soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted January 9, 2015 Report Share Posted January 9, 2015 It is a Constellar. It's also a "tellarknight" But I can easily see people arguing whether it works with Tellarknight support and Constellar support if it was printed as one word, instead of clearly defining that it is a part of both archetypes. That issue used to come up now and then with XX-Sabers being X-Sabers, and Lavalvals being Lavals. I don't think Constellars will add this to their Extra. I think Tellarknights will play this for access to M7. But space might be too tight... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VampireofDarkness Posted January 9, 2015 Report Share Posted January 9, 2015 It is a Constellar. It's also a "tellarknight" But I can easily see people arguing whether it works with Tellarknight support and Constellar support if it was printed as one word, instead of clearly defining that it is a part of both archetypes. That issue used to come up now and then with XX-Sabers being X-Sabers, and Lavalvals being Lavals. I don't think Constellars will add this to their Extra. I think Tellarknights will play this for access to M7. But space might be too tight... You kidding me, like Triverr, everyone's gonna spam this thing because it destroys Shaddolls and Burning Abyss. Triverr into Diamond into M7 probably won't be amazing, but somebody will do it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted January 9, 2015 Report Share Posted January 9, 2015 The TCG probably didn't want to confuse people by having 2 archetype names in the same word. Which is a slight shame, because Constellarknight works so well. The name kind of sounds awkward as "Stellarknight Constellar", but it could be worse. It could have been "Constellar Stellarknight". Yeah, it's the whole lswarm and Evilswarm/Steelswarm thing all over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted January 9, 2015 Report Share Posted January 9, 2015 Aww, bummers, I liked the original name ;w; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted January 9, 2015 Report Share Posted January 9, 2015 It also blocks some important hero pieces like Blazeman, Dark Law, Mist, and Mask Charge. Just realized it's not once per turn either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 10, 2015 Report Share Posted January 10, 2015 That issue used to come up now and then with XX-Sabers being X-Sabers, and Lavalvals being Lavals.The obvious solution is to reprint them; 'XX-Saber' now becomes 'X-Saber X-Saber', etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirReal Posted January 10, 2015 Report Share Posted January 10, 2015 Honestly, the funniest thing about this card is that you can very easily put a Constellar Omega next to it to protect both from backrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.