NEOSANNALS Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 THIS POST HAS BEEN "DELETED" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinnDragon Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Okey. Pokemon cards. DON'T get me wrong. I LOVE POKEMON. But......: 1. XYZ Monsters..... with out XYZ Effects? (A.K.A No detaching XYZ Materials at alll?) 2. Mewtwo is Level 6 Normal Monster card with ATK 2500/DEF 2000? ( Make it level 7 and we are cool) Because i think this is your first post, this is all i can say for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Okey. Pokemon cards. DON'T get me wrong. I LOVE POKEMON. But......: 1. XYZ Monsters..... with out XYZ Effects? (A.K.A No detaching XYZ Materials at alll?) 2. Mewtwo is Level 6 Normal Monster card with ATK 2500/DEF 2000? ( Make it level 7 and we are cool) Because i think this is your first post, this is all i can say for now. 1. Number 69 says hi (along with Gem-Knight Pearl); both of them don't detach materials for effects (in former's case) 2. Go look at Frostosaurus at 2600 ATK / 1700 DEF at Level 6. No one's complaining about that one. That much said, you need to mention something further as to why you think Mewtwo should be bumped to Level 7; or further comment on the cards shown here. --- A word about Arceus. Just keep in mind that certain Decks are capable of making 3-mat Rank 8s, including Galaxy/Photon and Gimmick Puppets (assuming they even bother to summon 88). Although, as of late, former has taken to SSing Prime Photon (maybe they can still do it with Neo GEPD if 3-mat things still work in there). Words about the Typing; just keep their predominant Type in there; then have their secondary Type reflected in an effect, such as "This card is also treated as a/n (X)-Type monster", with X being whatever Type you wish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.