CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Toon RollbackNormal Spell Card(1) Target 1 Toon Monster you control; it can make a second attack during each Battle Phase this turn. Shadow Toon Normal Spell CardYou can only activate 1 “Shadow Toon” per turn. (1) If you control “Toon World”: Target 1 face-up monster your opponent controls; inflict damage to your opponent equal to that target’s current ATK. Ton no Kaban / Toon Briefcase Normal Trap Card(1) When your opponent Summons a monster while you control a Toon Monster: Shuffle that monster into the Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 I'll take all 3 thank you. Toons tier 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mshends Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Toon Briefcase is amazing, Rollback is great, shadow is alright I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 I'll take all 3 thank you. Toons tier 0 Rollback looks the least useful. Shadow Toon is a pretty damn good finisher. Rollback is very very good. Toons got a complete fuckton this set like holy hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Look! More toon bull crap they don't deserve! I hate this. These cards are dull and boring, this archetype is trash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mshends Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Look! More toon bull crap they don't deserve! I hate this. These cards are dull and boring, this archetype is trash. What do you expect, is used by that dirty bastard pegasus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Look! More toon bull crap they don't deserve! I hate this. These cards are dull and boring, this archetype is trash. Remind me to say the same next time your favorite archetype gets support. Define "deserve". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 What do you expect, is used by that fabulous bitch, pegasus Well, they are just so bland and skilless, I wouldn't like to play against these since any numpty could play them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mshends Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Well, they are just so bland and skilless, I wouldn't like to play against these since any numpty could play them. LOL love the way you fixed my post XD . Well I guess Toon deserve these support, they had been forgotten for quite some time now, until now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Well, they are just so bland and skilless, I wouldn't like to play against these since any numpty could play them. Best argument against any kind of deck. Define "skilless"? Skillfull decks would be Shaddolls, Nekroz, BA. By that logic, any non-meta deck is skilless and trash and doesn't deserve support. Also, bland? They're getting some of the most original and crazy effects ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Remind me to say the same next time your favorite archetype gets support. Define "deserve". Deserve: I don't think they should get such good cards that are so bland, the archetype itself was so interesting and we have always liked it but I don't like how they have been supported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuelSpectre Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Rollback: Summon big toonstick, attack twice. K Shadow: Ring of Destruction, sort of. K Toon Briefcase: Bottomless Trap Hole on steroids. K...wait, does it only stop inherent summons? never mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Deserve: I don't think they should get such good cards that are so bland, the archetype itself was so interesting and we have always liked it but I don't like how they have been supported. Doppleganger is bland? Toon Kingdom is bland? Toon Briefcase is bland? Like what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 this thread is already hilarious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Best argument against any kind of deck. Define "skilless"? Skillfull decks would be Shaddolls, Nekroz, BA. By that logic, any non-meta deck is skilless and trash and doesn't deserve support. Also, bland? They're getting some of the most original and crazy effects ever seen.Yes. Bland. Because all of the cards are SO obviously interesting. I mean, look at them. Attack twice. Boring. Literally just a burn. Boring. Bottomless that shuffles instead. Mildly interesting but still pretty straightforward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megamaw Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Best argument against any kind of deck. Define "skilless"? Skillfull decks would be Shaddolls, Nekroz, BA. By that logic, any non-meta deck is skilless and trash and doesn't deserve support. Also, bland? They're getting some of the most original and crazy effects ever seen. Okay, I like Toons as much as the next guy, but are you saying the meta requires no skill? I'd say there's a fair amount of skill between Nekroz mirrors, and BA in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Yes. Bland. Because all of the cards are SO obviously interesting. I mean, look at them. Attack twice. Boring. Literally just a burn. Boring. Sakaretsu armour that shuffles instead. Mildly interesting but still pretty straightforward. What's an "interesting" card to you then? Wow, Nekroz of Valkyrus. A Battle Fader that can tribute things to draw. Boring. Wow, Satellarknight Delteros. Xyz that pops cards and floats. Boring. You realize overcomplicated cards don't really hold a place in any game? You shouldn't have to read a card multiple times to get it becaues it has 8 lines of text. If things like Ultimaya and shit are "interesting" to you, then sure, I get it, they're flashy. But not everything in the game can be flashy as fuck with 10 lines of text. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megamaw Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Best argument against any kind of deck. Define "skilless"? Skillfull decks would be Shaddolls, Nekroz, BA. By that logic, any non-meta deck is skilless and trash and doesn't deserve support. Also, bland? They're getting some of the most original and crazy effects ever seen. Okay, I like Toons as much as the next guy, but are you saying the meta requires no skill? I can't tell if that's sarcasm or not. It's the internet. I'd say there's a fair amount of skill in playing BA, and while Shaddolls are kinda helmet, I'd argue the Nekroz mirror requires a fair amount of skill, as well. EDIT: Jesus, it posted twice. Whoops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Okay, I like Toons as much as the next guy, but are you saying the meta requires no skill? I'd say there's a fair amount of skill between Nekroz mirrors, and BA in general. I said the complete opposite like what the fuck are you guys reading. [i]Skillfull decks would be Shaddolls, Nekroz, BA.[/i] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Okay, I like Toons as much as the next guy, but are you saying the meta requires no skill? I can't tell if that's sarcasm or not. It's the internet. I'd say there's a fair amount of skill in playing BA, and while Shaddolls are kinda helmet, I'd argue the Nekroz mirror requires a fair amount of skill, as well. EDIT: Jesus, it posted twice. Whoops. Shaddolls aren't helmet in the slightest ): You're generally correct, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 What's an "interesting" card to you then? Wow, Nekroz of Valkyrus. A Battle Fader that can tribute things to draw. Boring. Wow, Satellarknight Delteros. Xyz that pops cards and floats. Boring. You realize overcomplicated cards don't really hold a place in any game? You shouldn't have to read a card multiple times to get it becaues it has 8 lines of text. If things like Ultimaya and shit are "interesting" to you, then sure, I get it, they're flashy. But not everything in the game can be flashy as fuck with 10 lines of text.Lol do you even hear yourself? You are comparing a simple attack twice to an xyz that pops and floats. Comparing Valkyrie is a bit weird too as he does quite interesting plays for the deck and is quite helpful in various ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megamaw Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 I said the complete opposite like what the f*** are you guys reading. Skillfull decks would be Shaddolls, Nekroz, BA. Wilikers, I thought you were being sarcastic, and you were one-a those guys that basically shit on the meta because it's the meta. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Lol do you even hear yourself? You are comparing a simple attack twice to an xyz that pops and floats. Implying popping and floating are things that are new and flashy? Every 2nd Xyz kills cards or finds cards or draws cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted May 13, 2015 Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Lol do you even hear yourself? You are comparing a simple attack twice to an xyz that pops and floats. Well, what's the difference? What makes popping and floating interesting that makes attacking twice boring? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2015 Wilikers, I thought you were being sarcastic, and you were one-a those guys that basically shit on the meta because it's the meta. My bad. Oh no, quite the opposite. No worries, it might have sounded like sarcasm a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.