Jump to content

The Apollo Moon Landing was faked.

HORUS

By HORUS
in General

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Draco Straybyrn Newbie

Draco Straybyrn

Posted
Posted

It is a possibility. But I never fully got how exactly these nut jobs expect to make a permanent moon base. Where are they going to get their oxygen? Maybe plants' date=' but don't they also need to eat? And how exactly nurturing is the moon for plants?

 

....Wow.

[/quote']

 

No.

 

The moon comes from a government projector reflecting off their satellite in the sky.

 

Anyone with a brain knows that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Collaborator

Zeppeli Gyro Supreme

Posted
Posted

It is a possibility. But I never fully got how exactly these nut jobs expect to make a permanent moon base. Where are they going to get their oxygen? Maybe plants' date=' but don't they also need to eat? And how exactly nurturing is the moon for plants?

 

....Wow.

[/quote']

 

No.

 

The moon comes from a government projector reflecting off their satellite in the sky.

 

Anyone with a brain knows that.

I wish that were true. Because then that would mean the US Gov (or whatever other government it is) would actually be smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest JoshIcy

Guest JoshIcy

Posted
Posted

It is a possibility. But I never fully got how exactly these nut jobs expect to make a permanent moon base. Where are they going to get their oxygen? Maybe plants' date=' but don't they also need to eat? And how exactly nurturing is the moon for plants?

 

....Wow.

[/quote']

 

No.

 

The moon comes from a government projector reflecting off their satellite in the sky.

 

Anyone with a brain knows that.

 

im sorry, but ive gotta ask... which i likely never will after this, your debates are kinda lofty and float towards one end of the pool.. little logic so i wont really join :| i suck at your sort of debates...

 

ok now....

evidence on that theory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Draco Straybyrn Newbie

Draco Straybyrn

Posted
Posted

It is a possibility. But I never fully got how exactly these nut jobs expect to make a permanent moon base. Where are they going to get their oxygen? Maybe plants' date=' but don't they also need to eat? And how exactly nurturing is the moon for plants?

 

....Wow.

[/quote']

 

No.

 

The moon comes from a government projector reflecting off their satellite in the sky.

 

Anyone with a brain knows that.

 

im sorry, but ive gotta ask... which i likely never will after this, your debates are kinda lofty and float towards one end of the pool.. little logic so i wont really join :| i suck at your sort of debates...

 

ok now....

evidence on that theory?

 

That post is illegible.

 

Please try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Draco Straybyrn Newbie

Draco Straybyrn

Posted
Posted

Draco's statements does make sense. It could actually be a satellite.

But how could that be if the moon has existed since the roman times and whatnot?

They wrote about it' date=' made a word for it (Luna) and crap like that.

[/quote']

 

It's a conspiracy, obv. Think, and then use ED if you can't figure it out.

 

 

@Crab Helmet. lern2google.

 

4Chan + Stickam > Whatever you were saying.

 

EDIT: TOW says to tell you lex parsimoniae.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest JoshIcy

Guest JoshIcy

Posted
Posted

It is a possibility. But I never fully got how exactly these nut jobs expect to make a permanent moon base. Where are they going to get their oxygen? Maybe plants' date=' but don't they also need to eat? And how exactly nurturing is the moon for plants?

 

....Wow.

[/quote']

 

No.

 

The moon comes from a government projector reflecting off their satellite in the sky.

 

Anyone with a brain knows that.

 

im sorry, but ive gotta ask... which i likely never will after this, your debates are kinda lofty and float towards one end of the pool.. little logic so i wont really join :| i suck at your sort of debates...

 

ok now....

evidence on that theory?

 

That post is illegible.

 

Please try again.

 

evidence on your theory that the moon is simply a government projected image?

 

good enough english for "you"? as for the illegible thing, i get english that is so horrid everyday that it would make you puke... come to hawaii, learn some pijen and then say whats legible.... ^_^ maybe a vast different cultural experience will help you....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Azuh Newbie

Azuh

Posted
Posted

obviously the moon landing was fake. Why? Because why havent they gone there again? Why not prove themselves that it was actually true. Also... if there was no wind on the moon... how do the flag move?

 

lolz at this

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frunk Newbie

Frunk

Posted
Posted

Of course there is a moon! I live on the dark side, KA Flame on the light, Slimey in the middle, Elsandero on the inside, and some other people who very much killed the joke by moving there.

 

The only conspiracy theory that I believe in is the one about conspiracy theorists never actually having been laid in their life.

 

Am I a conspiracy theorist? No. Have I been laid? No. Do I live on the moon? Yes.

 

Now go away.

 

Edit: @ Azuh: They won't because we'll shoot them, and you've never been in a gravity chamber, have you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fh-Fh Newbie

Fh-Fh

Posted
Posted

The moon landing was real. It was cost the government MORE money to fake it than to make it real. We didn't go back there because:

A) We made our point.

B) Too much money.

C) Risk of failure (there always was)

D) Mars

 

Also Armstrong blew his line. One small step for A man, one giant leap for mankind. XD If it was fake, they would have fixed that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HORUS Newbie

HORUS

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The moon landing was real. It was cost the government MORE money to fake it than to make it real. We didn't go back there because:

A) We made our point.

B) Too much money.

C) Risk of failure (there always was)

D) Mars

 

Also Armstrong blew his line. One small step for A man' date=' one giant leap for mankind. XD If it was fake, they would have fixed that.

[/quote']

 

So it would cost more money to produce a short video than to send men into space on a rocket and then bring them back? Thats several billion dollars there.

 

what did he mess up about that line?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tonisanoob Newbie

tonisanoob

Posted
Posted

the rerason they went is because there was no war at the time (i think) so the govermenty had a bit more money and they wanted to beat russia to the moon

 

and now it would cost even more money than it did back then in relative terms

 

plus the reason the flag moved was bcos there was a pole in the top of it, so it wouldnt fall down as there is no wind to blow it to keep it up duuur

 

and if you moved the flag with a pole int he top it would flutter wind or no wind

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JesusofChaos™ Newbie

JesusofChaos™

Posted
Posted

the rerason they went is because there was no war at the time (i think) so the govermenty had a bit more money and they wanted to beat russia to the moon

 

and now it would cost even more money than it did back then in relative terms

 

plus the reason the flag moved was bcos there was a pole in the top of it' date=' so it wouldnt fall down as there is no wind to blow it to keep it up duuur

 

and if you moved the flag with a pole int he top it would flutter wind or no wind

[/quote']

 

ever heard of the cold war?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...