My complaint about Sakura Haruno

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

Parts of what follows below were actually painful to write. However, because of the ongoing misinformation campaigns launched by Sakura Haruno and his representatives I feel it is my duty to write this. Just so you know, I plan to spend a good deal of this letter discussing Sakura and his flippant, hectoring stances. I also plan to say a bit about how Sakura's ramblings are a loquacious form of thuggery, but I'll save that part for the end.

In spite of all Sakura has done, I must admit I really like the guy. No, just kidding. The truth is that inasmuch as I disagree with Sakura's accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet Sakura's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. I used to agree completely with those who claimed that he chivvies distasteful harijans to his side by convincing them that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal. Interestingly, my views on this have changed slightly as I have learned more about human motivation and human behavior. Now I believe that even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that Sakura managed to convince a bunch of the most volage-brained meanies I've ever seen to help him delude and often rob those rendered vulnerable and susceptible to his snares because of poverty, illness, or ignorance. What was the quid pro quo there? The answer to this question gives the key not only to world history but to all human culture.

Sakura is an incompetent liar. Let's list some of Sakura's more unforgiving lies: First, he professes that expansionism is a beautiful entelechy that makes us whole. Second, he avows that he has an absolute right to be intolerant in the name of tolerance. And third, he wants us to believe that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of nativism. I presented that list to get you to see that Sakura says that he can succeed without trying. At least we can't accuse him of hiding his prejudices, I suppose. Of course, it would nice if Sakura were also to confess that he counts costive four-flushers as his friends. Unfortunately for Sakura, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that he justifies his blasphemous epigrams with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Sakura's claim that it is prissy to question his revenge fantasies then he will prop up corrupt despots around the world.

Some people think it's a bit extreme of me to serve on the side of Truth—a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that Sakura is unhappy that people like me want to shout back at his propaganda. Such cavils notwithstanding, throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to follow through on the critical work that has already begun and those who wish to stifle the voices of those who are simply seeking to be heard. Naturally, Sakura belongs to the latter category. If I may be so bold, I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why I've tried to explain to Sakura's disputatious toadies that today we are witnessing a concerted attempt by Sakura's band to reduce us to acute penury. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that Sakura is a pretty good liar most of the time. However, he tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday.

Unfortunately, there is no shortage of individuals and organizations, many of whom may seem innocent at first glance, who secretly want to force square pegs into round holes. If you fear that Sakura's brain-damaged, scornful expositions are leading toward the downfall of society, then pull out your doomsday prep list: things are about to get a lot worse. I say this because Sakura has remarked that the stork is responsible for procreation. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand I'll spell it out for you. For starters, mankind needs to do more to clear the cobwebs out of people's heads and help them understand that it's really hard to take someone as lusk as Sakura very seriously. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that I shall not argue that Sakura's newsgroup postings are an authentic map of his plan to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. Read them and see for yourself.

People have pointed out to me that we need to change Sakura's lamentations for the same reason that one needs to change a baby's diapers, but I still can't help but think that Sakura says that he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can imagine. You know, he can lie as much as he wants, but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd unmistakably prevent anyone from hearing that he keeps repeating over and over again that he knows the “right” way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. This verbigeration is symptomatic of an excessive love of resistentialism and indicates to me that Sakura is a serial exaggerator. If I were to be less kind, I'd say he's a liar. Either way, I once tried to explain to Sakura that his shenanigans will bad-mouth worthy causes. Rather than feel ashamed of himself, Sakura got angry at me. What this says is that Sakura has been trying hard to convince us that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. He undeniably has a knack for refining snake oil to unprecedented purity, potency, and opacity, doesn't he? In any case, I would be grateful if Sakura would take a little time from his rigorous schedule to dispel ignorance. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens.

I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that Sakura and his serfs are social pariahs and should be ostracized. Still, I recommend you check out some of Sakura's capilotades and draw your own conclusions on the matter. His animadversions are clear testimony to the fact that it would be a work of supererogation to show some backbone at a time when every week there transpires news of philopolemical, uncontrollable carousers following Sakura's orders to have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together, and hence, by extension, he keeps saying that people find his unrelenting, over-the-top hostility rather refreshing. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, groupthink and mob behavior are common within his coven. Hence, it isn't unusual for one who commits heresy against Sakura's established dogma to be exiled from the community. The sad part is that these outcasts still refuse to believe that there's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will indisputably persist as long as Sakura continues to turn back the clock and repeal all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books.

Sakura peddles the usual apologist fare on the purpose of deconstructionism. That is, he claims that deconstructionism is intended to acknowledge the ideological forces that attempt to shape our lives. He might as well be claiming that he can change his unholy ways. The truth is that when people say that bigotry and hate are alive and well, they're right. And Sakura is to blame.

Sakura had previously claimed that he had no intention to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis. Of course, shortly thereafter, that's exactly what he did. Next, he denied that he would do exactly the things he accuses unenlightened rubes of doing. We all know what happened then. Now, Sakura would have us believe he'd never ever replace our natural soul with an artificial one. Will he? Go figure. My view is that I have a plan to outline Sakura's troubling pattern of lying, incompetence, and carelessness. I call this plan “Operation dismantle the system of iscariotic forces that Sakura deploys in the name of national defense”. (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that Sakura expects us to behave like passive sheep. The only choice he believes we should be allowed to make for ourselves is whether to head towards his slaughterhouse at a trot or at a gallop. Sakura decidedly doesn't want us choosing to change the direction in which our society is headed.

The agenda that Sakura is attempting to advance is one of pessimism, repression, and clericalism. That's self-evident, and even Sakura would probably agree with me on that. Even so, his victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Sakura's lickspittles, who loudly proclaim that hanging out with disruptive dingbats is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. Regardless of those revolting proclamations, the truth is that he alleges that everything I say is both lackadaisical and overweening. Seldom do I pause to answer such criticism of my work and ideas. If I did, I would find little time for anything other than such correspondence in the course of the day, and I would have absolutely no time for constructive work. Hence, I intend to condense my response into the following remark: Sakura is right about one thing, namely that fear is what motivates us. Fear of what it means when conniving Fagins empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people. Fear of what it says about our society when we teach our children that Sakura's activities are on the up-and-up. And fear of peevish scoundrels like Sakura who insult the intelligence, interests, and life plans of whole groups of people. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes upon volumes if I would let it. However, I probably ought to end my missive here with the simple observation that Sakura Haruno's perversions have no redeeming value.

 

disclaimer: just joking, this was a generated rant and any similarities to real life people or events is purely coincidental 

 

also ily sakura

[Resident Fascist]

china called

they want their wall back

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

tell china they can find generated walls aplenty elsewhere

 

like this one ^__^

 

 

Based on Nagato's response to my previous letter, I believe it's safe to say that Nagato is the high priest of vigilantism. First things first: One of the bewildering paradoxes of our time is the extent to which Nagato is willing to waste taxpayers' money, especially given that he himself would be affected by such actions. If you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none. Surely, the good Lord must have wept when He saw Nagato persuade many of his detractors to enter into a one-way “dialogue” with him.

I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want Nagato to make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely pathological, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while Nagato claims that criminals are merely social rebels. His campaigns have no redeeming value. Please re-read and memorize that sentence if you still believe that everything will be hunky-dory if we let Nagato impose a “glass ceiling” that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs. I'm not a hypocritical person. I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to Nagato's subordinates and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work together to speak out against indecent, spleeny protestors. Unfortunately, knowing them, they'd rather confuse, disorient, and disunify because that's what Nagato wants. His tricks are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're entirely cranky, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, this is not the place to develop that subject. It demands many pages of analysis, which I can't spare in this letter. Instead, I'll just state the key point, which is that if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him.

If you've ever watched television or read a book, odds are that you already know that Nagato used to maintain that he is a model citizen. However, after my last letter so eloquently put a lie to that, Nagato and his expositors have busily if rather quietly gone to work on their palinodes—amending here, canceling there, and generally trying to conceal the fact that there isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash, so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of Nagato's from the get-go. His opuscula are of use to nobody and nothing, without meaning, without educational purpose, without ethos, surviving on the basis of a traditionally fostered prejudice. Concordantly, one might say that Nagato recently wrote a Strategic Bulverism Plan. If you ever read it, you'll see that it documents Nagato's intent to throw us into a “heads I win, tails you lose” situation. Shortly thereafter, Nagato wrote a Strategic Classism Plan, which is all about bowdlerizing all unfavorable descriptions of Nagato's calumnies. Nagato is apparently fond of strategizing. It's also rather apparent that there are two things we need to do right away. First, we need to expose every tendentious practice of every tendentious schemer. Second—and this is critical so get out your highlighter—we need to improve the world. Once those two things are accomplished we can finally start discussing how Nagato's comrades' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be.

It remains to be seen whether Nagato's sodality of insipid insensitive-types is capable of self-critique. Will its members acknowledge their own insularity and excesses, or will they continue down the path of smug self-congratulation and vanity, never passing up an opportunity to condone universal oppression? In either case, some people aver that perennial crybabies like Nagato wouldn't fare well without a legal skirt to hide under. Others contend that Nagato is the world champion of simplism. In the interest of clearing up the confusion I'll make the following observation: I can guarantee the readers of this letter that Nagato wants a central organization for his international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other countries—a haven for fatuitous roisterers and a university for budding snarky tyrants . Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that Nagato, like all dimwitted headcases, is brassbound. I do have to apologize for that; not all of them are brassbound. Just kidding; yes they are. All such humor aside, we've tolerated Nagato's birdbrained announcements long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. It's time to shout to the world that today, we might have let him convince every smear sheet in the country to refer to his nemeses as sniffish deadbeats. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will overcome the obstacles that people like Nagato establish.

Nagato claims that the Scriptures are responsible for his spineless thoughts and fancies. This eisegetical fantasy is not only stuporous, but it fails to consider that I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Nagato's subterfuge. I'm completely stunned. If he can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If he can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it.

If I thought that Nagato's proposed social programs had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to shield people from Nagato's scary and uncompromising deceptions, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I hope not, but then again, Nagato claims to have data supporting his assertion that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract. Naturally, he insists that he can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified reason, of course. My guess is that he's hiding something. Maybe he's hiding the fact that in his antipluralism outfit, presenteeism is revered, common sense eschewed, and absolutism matters more than probity. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to him.

To pick an obvious but often overlooked example, Nagato maintains not only that he never engages in eccentric, quixotic, or adversarial politics but also that he is cunctipotent. He's wrong on all counts. In reality, Nagato has offered to deter his lieutenants from introducing a zeitgeist of ultracrepidarianism to our society. Did he follow through with that? No, of course not. This failure may be Nagato's most consequential broken promise. It suggests that perhaps Nagato should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, Nagato's artifices sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense.

If Nagato is incapable of discerning the mad ramblings of slovenly quodlibetarians from the wisdom and nuance embedded in a sage's discourse then I seriously doubt that he'll be capable of determining that his personal attacks are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of “tradition”. Funny, that was the same term that Nagato's cat's-paws once used to create massive civil unrest. He is guided by the ignis fatuus of elitism. Surprisingly, the courts and our elected officials are way ahead of him in embracing this simple fact. Nagato presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to beat plowshares into swords.

Nagato intentionally produces psychological discomfort in others. Some people might object to that claim, and if they do, my response is: In public, Nagato vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Nagato never fails to dismantle the family unit. If I want to experience psychological stress or “cognitive dissonance”, that should be my prerogative. I don't need him forcing me to. The obvious implications notwithstanding, Nagato spends most of his waking hours fulminating against everyone who has ever considered instituting change. In fact, I have said that to Nagato on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until he stops teaching the next generation how to hate—and whom to hate.

We must illustrate the virtues that Nagato lacks—courage, truthfulness, courtesy, honesty, diligence, chivalry, loyalty, and industry. By “we”, I mean all the hundreds of thousands who fundamentally long for the same thing without, as individuals, finding the words to describe outwardly what they inwardly visualize. Dangerous obstructionism is a disgrace to humanity but it cannot be eliminated by moral lectures or by pious intentions. No, it can be eradicated only if we arraign him at the tribunal of public opinion. Let's get reasonable; I honestly seek nothing but justice. That's self-evident, and even Nagato would probably agree with me on that. Even so, if he is going to talk about higher standards then he needs to live by those higher standards. With this letter, I hope I have made my views clear: It may seem excessive to note that I can say with absolute certitude that the most troubling aspect of Nagato's personality is his intolerance of dissent.

[AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW]

Tl;dr version for people like me who can't read that because the paragraphs aren't double spaced:

 

• I like like Sakura.
• Sakura is a liar.
• Sakura is a bad liar.
• Four people who flush toilets are Sakura's friends, but they are fake af.
• Sakura is not happy.
• Sakura is part of the mafia.
• Sakura's lies will make civilization as we know it explode into a thousand little pieces.
• Sakura is a good liar.
• Sakura says the stork is guilty and you shouldn't trust your children.
• If it's so hard to take Sakura seriously, then why does everyone do it? It just makes no sense!
• Here, read this map.
• Someone change that baby's diaper already.
• It's ok if Sakura lies.
• There is a correct way to read Plato, and your way is wrong.
• If I was a meanie-pants, I would say Sakura is a liar.
• Sakura is mad.
• Sakura is not a SJW.
• Pigs will fly! Hooray!
• All people involved in politics are Satan.
• Don't listen to what I say, don't listen to what Sakura says. Make up your own mind, but if you don't listen to me you're stupid.
• Sakura is the cause of global warming.
• Sakura can singlehandedly end all sins.
• It's all Sakura's fault.
• Sakura didn't mean to be a criminal.
• Sakura needs a shorter and catchier name.
• Sakura's victims have been speaking out for years now!
• People criticize me all the time, so I have to ignore them.
• Sakura is right.
• I could write an entire book series about Sakura. The main character will be Gimli.

Don't make me do the other one.