Jump to content

A Summer Miracle~! [Toyo Single]


宇佐見 蓮子@C94

Recommended Posts

6YKnqAk.png

1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Monsters
When this card is Synchro Summoned: You can discard 1 card and send 1 face-down card you control to the graveyard; Declare 1 card type, then excavate cards up to the number of non-Tuner monsters used for the Synchro Summon of this card. If a card with the same card type as the one declared is Excavated, destroy 1 card on the field. Add the cards Excavated by this effect to your hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, since I'm new to this my criticism may be a little out of whack but no offense intended. SO if I understand its an immediate neg 2 (with the potential of an effect going off for the face down, maybe Shaddoll Falco or something would work  nice here? then you send cards up to the number of non synchros you used, most likely 2. Then you potentially blow up  cards while essentially plussing two again by adding the sent cards back to your hand. Would the  actually excavating of the cards set off monster effects, e.g Shaddoll Beast? because then you plus by effects and still retain control of the card. It seems really powerful for a generic card if everything works in it's favour, I would suggest that a way to balance it  could  be by making it harder to summon - E.g a Water Tuner or a Dark Tuner to have easy access in Shaddoll. Hope I'm not completely off the  mark here ^.^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, since I'm new to this my criticism may be a little out of whack but no offense intended. SO if I understand its an immediate neg 2 (with the potential of an effect going off for the face down, maybe Shaddoll Falco or something would work  nice here? then you send cards up to the number of non synchros you used, most likely 2. Then you potentially blow up  cards while essentially plussing two again by adding the sent cards back to your hand. Would the  actually excavating of the cards set off monster effects, e.g Shaddoll Beast? because then you plus by effects and still retain control of the card. It seems really powerful for a generic card if everything works in it's favour, I would suggest that a way to balance it  could  be by making it harder to summon - E.g a Water Tuner or a Dark Tuner to have easy access in Shaddoll. Hope I'm not completely off the  mark here ^.^

It doesn't trigger anything from Shaddoll that I know of, since the send to grave and discard are costs, and Shaddolls only trigger when they are sent to grave by an effect.

 

Cost =/= Effect. Also, Excavating doesn't trigger any of the Shaddolls since unlike Sylvans which send the Excavated cards to the grave, this immediately adds them to the hand upon resolving without ever touching the grave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay, that is one of the things I slip up on, I wasn't sure if they would go to the grave first. Yeah, now that I understand this card is not as powerful as I thought, though it would obviously have its uses. Do you  think it would be too overpowered if it did trigger the effects or is that not what you was going for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This card would most likely shine in a deck that can profit from discarding and getting cards in the graveyard. Obviously it's not going to compare to certain broken cards but because its effect is a bit pot luck and/or a lot of set up I think its stats could be a little higher. I don't see why it cant reach the 3000 mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, then it's just okay.

 

Have a chance to trigger stuffs, but that...pretty much it. I'd say it's really overcosted. Abusable with the right kind of deck (that doesn't exist yet), but outside of that as a generic synch it's meh. A low chance to break even if you activate its effect normally and made it with 2 monsters, and giving it more mats when you make it would only increase the chance slightly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, then it's just okay.

 

Have a chance to trigger stuffs, but that...pretty much it. I'd say it's really overcosted. Abusable with the right kind of deck (that doesn't exist yet), but outside of that as a generic synch it's meh. A low chance to break even if you activate its effect normally and made it with 2 monsters, and giving it more mats when you make it would only increase the chance slightly.

Was thinking of negging one of the costs, either the discard or the send face-down. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best way I can think of equalising the cost off the bat is to either Discard 1 card or Send 1 Face-Down card as its cost. Having both does make it rather overbearing and in certain decks a discard can be profitable, so that's what I'd stick with. Are you going to make a Miracle for every season?

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/331531-a-winter-miracle-toyo-single/

 

made Winter miracle. Also, ehhhh

Not really sure about making it "Or". It's one or the other imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your final thought is making it one or the other, I think the best route to go down then is discarding. I think it's really difficult (but not impossible) to capitalise from sending a Face-down monster you control to the grave. If you want things in the grave there are easier ways to do it and that kind of effect wont be able to help most meta decks. At least with discarding its a little quicker and obviously it sets off some neat effects.

 

 

I like the winter variant more. Its a lot easier to play and comes out with a purpose of beating and beating fairly hard. 3 cards to remove is a fair cost and I like it's other gaining atk effect. I guess the only thing I would mention is that they really are not similar in any way and don't connect well. If your plan is to make a lot of different cards I can see why you would be put off about making this into an arcytype as they would really only share the same name unless you came up with a protection spell card, or something that has an effect activate when you summon a 'Miracle' monster. Is there any reason you changed directions so harshly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the winter variant more. Its a lot easier to play and comes out with a purpose of beating and beating fairly hard. 3 cards to remove is a fair cost and I like it's other gaining atk effect. I guess the only thing I would mention is that they really are not similar in any way and don't connect well. If your plan is to make a lot of different cards I can see why you would be put off about making this into an arcytype as they would really only share the same name unless you came up with a protection spell card, or something that has an effect activate when you summon a 'Miracle' monster. Is there any reason you changed directions so harshly?

they're completely unrelated in any way shape or form

just cards i thought i'd make over the different seasons for fun. and i'll really never make them into an archetype, just as generic techs in certain decks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the concept of seasons is a pretty good one, they seem to do clearly different roles which is why I wasn't sure. I guess the similar name and theme lead me to believe there might have been plans to connect them. Anyway if you do create anymore of the seasons or Miracle I think it would be nice to see what they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the concept of seasons is a pretty good one, they seem to do clearly different roles which is why I wasn't sure. I guess the similar name and theme lead me to believe there might have been plans to connect them. Anyway if you do create anymore of the seasons or Miracle I think it would be nice to see what they do.

I already have plans for Spring and Autumn, just gotta wait for the time to be proper~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...