YamiNekoChan Posted March 28, 2016 Report Share Posted March 28, 2016 A little card to go along with Cardcar D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted March 29, 2016 Report Share Posted March 29, 2016 But that's clearly a "C" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YamiNekoChan Posted March 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2016 But that's clearly a "C"Shhh, no one will notice. :c+Maybe the C stands for Cardcar. Yes ofc, it makes sense now *o* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted March 29, 2016 Report Share Posted March 29, 2016 But that's clearly a "C" You do know about the Advanced Clause in this section, right? Please give an appropriate review; thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arimetal Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 Without d it is a slow and restricting +0 with +1 hand advantage With d it makes the effect +0 with +1 more hand advantage Buff it a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuuji Kazami Posted March 31, 2016 Report Share Posted March 31, 2016 Well, I think I agree with the Cardcar "C" part atleast. To be honest, I really don't believe in more support for Cardcar B. After all, if anyone has ever played against burn/stall/slow Exodia, then you would know they all would run this card. The card isn't bad in any areas. In fact, it's a great card to use for decks like Artifacts and Psy-Frames. However, it gets really annoying playing against a deck that gives you draws into Battle Fader and Swift Scarecrow, since it allows them to continue to stall and such, which is really annoying. Then again, considering today's meta, it probably won't be hard to play around those decks now. I mean seriously, Magical Explosion FTK is still running loose. Maybe change the name though. Cardcar C sounds a lot better, and gives a more fonder feel to the card for being related to Cardcar D. Looking back, I guess the card is technically fine for only allowing the draw of 1 card. No Dani, please don't boost this anymore. It's fine as it is. You should check out Duel Portal, Yami, because you can upload your own custom cards onto there and test them. Good job on this one too. The correct limitations are in place, as well as the hard OPT. You've certainly improved... Fast. =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YamiNekoChan Posted March 31, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2016 Well, I think I agree with the Cardcar "C" part atleast. To be honest, I really don't believe in more support for Cardcar B. After all, if anyone has ever played against burn/stall/slow Exodia, then you would know they all would run this card. The card isn't bad in any areas. In fact, it's a great card to use for decks like Artifacts and Psy-Frames. However, it gets really annoying playing against a deck that gives you draws into Battle Fader and Swift Scarecrow, since it allows them to continue to stall and such, which is really annoying. Then again, considering today's meta, it probably won't be hard to play around those decks now. I mean seriously, Magical Explosion FTK is still running loose. Maybe change the name though. Cardcar C sounds a lot better, and gives a more fonder feel to the card for being related to Cardcar D. Looking back, I guess the card is technically fine for only allowing the draw of 1 card. No Dani, please don't boost this anymore. It's fine as it is. You should check out Duel Portal, Yami, because you can upload your own custom cards onto there and test them. Good job on this one too. The correct limitations are in place, as well as the hard OPT. You've certainly improved... Fast. =PYayy, ty o3o. And about Duel Portal I would if I could. But my laptop is broken atm so yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.