Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted November 30, 2021 Report Share Posted November 30, 2021 Pot of Lust Normal Spell You can only activate 1 card with this card’s name per turn. (1) If you have 3 or more face-down banished cards: Reveal 3 face-down banished cards, then your opponent randomly adds 1 of them to your hand, and you shuffle the rest back into your Deck. Until the end of your next turn after this card resolves, your opponent takes no damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nyx Avatar Posted November 30, 2021 Report Share Posted November 30, 2021 I have to say Zefra, out of all the cards you've posted in the past week or two, this is one of your cooler ones. Yes, balance will always be calles into question. But out of all the ones you've posted in the past two weeks, this is one of the more realistic ones you've posted. I could realistically see this card existing. It'd make for a newt toy in Golden Castle Decks. Strict "Once per turn" clause, depending on your opponent's choice to add, and giving your opponent a damage pass. Whether or not this would suffice is subjective. But I do like the effort shown here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted November 30, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2021 21 minutes ago, The Nyx Avatar said: I have to say Zefra, out of all the cards you've posted in the past week or two, this is one of your cooler ones. Yes, balance will always be calles into question. But out of all the ones you've posted in the past two weeks, this is one of the more realistic ones you've posted. I could realistically see this card existing. It'd make for a newt toy in Golden Castle Decks. Strict "Once per turn" clause, depending on your opponent's choice to add, and giving your opponent a damage pass. Whether or not this would suffice is subjective. But I do like the effort shown here. Thanks its Damage pass it much hasher then Dark Ruler No mores's and Pot of Prosperity Damage Halving on the opponent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pommelo Posted November 30, 2021 Report Share Posted November 30, 2021 I agree with Nyxo, and I'd actually go as far as saying the card is perfectly balanced, I don't have doubts about that because a)It has a particular restrictive requirement as face-down banished effects aren't really that common and you ought to combine with other cards to make this work solidly, plus you got that no damage clause in place, that should be plenty enough for a card that is not even a +1 AND on top of that it's your opponent choosing. Making this any weaker would put it in the under-powered size, it's ok as-is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loleo Posted November 30, 2021 Report Share Posted November 30, 2021 6 hours ago, Rayfield Lumina said: I agree with Nyxo, and I'd actually go as far as saying the card is perfectly balanced, I don't have doubts about that because a)It has a particular restrictive requirement as face-down banished effects aren't really that common and you ought to combine with other cards to make this work solidly, plus you got that no damage clause in place, that should be plenty enough for a card that is not even a +1 AND on top of that it's your opponent choosing. Making this any weaker would put it in the under-powered size, it's ok as-is Well, I do agree it is perfectly balanced the opponent does randomly choose the card to add. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.