Azuh Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 Worst ever Ultimate Rare ive ever seen!!!Plus worst ever 6 star monster ive ever seen!!! Ay... Its better than Fusionist tho Like why is it a Level 6!!!It shoudl be a level 4 Plus in order for its effect to work properly, you would ahve to have at least 3 of them in a deck Pfft... luckily im not a fan of E-Hero and D-Hero cards... DEATH TO THEM ALL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Tips:Destiny_Hero_-_Malicious And that my friend, that's why it is Ultra rare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wicket Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 Amen, great praise, oh Malicious. I still think Plazma's the best, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue-eyes Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 I love d-hero and e-hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wicket Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 But Malicious and Plazma are the only 2 D-Heros I don't have, and I could use them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted July 15, 2007 Report Share Posted July 15, 2007 Malicious is useless without 3 of them however Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaoserver Posted July 15, 2007 Report Share Posted July 15, 2007 I.laugh.at.you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the Snakey Wolf Lord Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 I.laugh.at.you. lol, its like I.L.A.Y. 4 cards face down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Worst ever Ultimate Rare ive ever seen!!!Plus worst ever 6 star monster ive ever seen!!! I think you're serious, and that scares me a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Heh. Kids, don't just call any old low ATK card BAD. Destiny Hero - Malicious has practically made the format and is a fantastic card. If you think it's so bad, check on metagame.com and see how many of the decks from the recent tournaments uses them. Imo, this topic should be closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Imo' date=' this topic should be closed.[/quote'] Agreed, unless we all just want to rant about how great Malicious is, I think all that has to be said on this topic, has been said... well, besides the downsides of Malicious... which there aren't really many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quagmire_jr Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 it really sux.... its a suckier version of peten the dark clown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Man, I can't tell if he's being serious or not. I REALLY hope he isn't serious though. Peten is actually a WAY suckier version of Malicious. Although he is a higher level, he has way more versatility and has a lot more combos to use with him. Also, Peten misses his timing too much for my liking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Agreed, Shaco. Malicious > Peten in SO MANY ways. Let's see peten: Pros: Low Level, Decent DEF for lever, Dark = CCVable. Cons: Misses timing too much, not a great effect, effect happens as SOON as it gets sent to the grave. And Malicious: Pros: D-Drawable, CCVable, Warrior, RotAable, Effect happens anytime during your MP1/2, Metamorphable + Loads more. Cons: Tribute Monster, Low ATK Hmm... yup. The evidence backs up the statement. Please lock ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.