Guest Star Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I. Forbidden Cards You cannot use these cards in your Deck or Side Deck: BARREL DRAGONBLACK LUSTER SOLDIER - ENVOY OF THE BEGINNINGBLOWBACK DRAGONBUTTERFLY DAGGER - ELMACARD OF SAFE RETURNCHANGE OF HEARTCHAIN STRIKECHAOS EMPEROR DRAGON - ENVOY OF THE ENDCHIMERATECH OVERDRAGONCRUSH CARD VIRUSCUP OF ACECYBER END DRAGONCYBER JARCYBER-STEINCYBER TWIN DRAGONDARK ARMED DRAGONDARK HOLEDARK MAGICIAN OF CHAOSDECK DEVASTATION VIRUSDEMISE, KING OF ARMAGEDDONDESTINY HERO - DISK COMMANDERDELINQUENT DUODICE JARDIMENSION FUSIONERADICATOR EPEDEMIC VIRUSEXODIA THE FORBIDDEN ONEFIBER JARGAMBLER OF LEGENDGORZ, THE EMISSARY OF DARKNESSGRACEFUL CHARITYHARPIE'S FEATHER DUSTERIMPERIAL ORDERINFERNO TEMPESTJUDGMENT DRAGONLAST TURNLAST WILLLIFE EQUALIZERLIMITER REMOVALMAGICAL SCIENTISTMACHINE DUPLICATIONMIND CRUSHMIRAGE OF NIGHTMAREMONSTER REBORNNECROFACENOBLEMAN OF CROSSOUTPAINFUL CHOICEPHANTOM OF CHAOSPOT OF GREEDPREMATURE BURIALRAIGEKIRETURN FROM THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONRING OF DESTRUCTIONSAMSARA LOTUSSAND GAMBLERSINISTER SERPENTSIXTH SENSESKY SCOURGE NORLERASSNIPE HUNTERSNATCH STEALSWORDS OF REVEALING LIGHTTHE FORCEFUL SENTRYTHOUSAND-EYES RESTRICTTIME SEALTIME WIZARDTREEBORN FROGTSUKUYOMIVICTORY DRAGONWITCH OF THE BLACK FORESTYATA-GARASU New! - Barrel Dragon, Blowback Dragon, Card of Safe Return, Chain Strike, Chimeratech Overdragon, Crush Card Virus, Cup of Ace, Cyber End Dragon, Cyber Twin Dragon, Dark Armed Dragon, Dark Magician of Chaos, Deck Devastation Virus, Demise King of Armageddon, Destiny Hero - Disk Commander, Dice Jar, Eradicator Epidemic Virus, Exodia the Forbidden One, Gambler of Legend, Gorz, the Emissary of Darkness, Inferno Tempest, Judgment Dragon, Life Equalizer, Limiter Removal, Machine Duplication, Mind Crush, Monster Reborn, Necroface, Nobleman of Crossout, Phantom of Chaos, Premature Burial, Return from the Different Dimension, Samsara Lotus, Sand Gambler, Sky Scourge Norleras, Snipe Hunter, Swords of Revealing Light, The Forceful Sentry, Time Wizard, Treeborn Frog II. Limited Cards You can ONLY use one of the following cards in the Deck and Side Deck combined: ALLURE OF DARKNESSBEAST KING BARBAROSBLAZE ACCELERATORBRAIN CONTROLBREAKER THE MAGICAL WARRIORCAIUS THE SHADOW MONARCHCALL OF THE HAUNTEDCARD DESTRUCTIONCEASEFIRECHAOS SORCERERCONFISCATIONCYBER DRAGONDANDYLIONELEMENTAL HERO STRATOSGLADIATOR BEAST GYZARUSGOLD SARCOPHAGUSGRAVITY BINDGREEN BABOON, DEFENDER OF THE FORESTHEAVY STORMKURAZ THE LIGHT MONARCHLEVEL LIMIT - AREA BMAGICIAN OF FAITHMARSHMALLONMETAMORPHOSISMIRROR FORCEMORPHING JARSANGANSPIRIT REAPERSOUL EXCHANGETRAP DUSTSHOOTTORRENTIAL TRIBUTE New! - Allure of Darkness, Beast King Barbaros, Blaze Accelerator, reaker the Magical Warrior, Caius the Shadow Monarch, Call of the Haunted, Chaos Sorcerer, Confiscation, Cyber Dragon, Gladiator Beast Gyzarus, Kuraz the Light Monarch, Magician of Faith, Metamorphosis This is a rough draft. So, what do you think? UPDATES (6-3-2008): ALL MATCH CARDS UNBANNED.VICTORY DRAGON BANNED.DARK WORLD DEALINGS UNLIMITED.BEAST KING BARBAROS LIMITED.THE FORCEFUL SENTRY BANNED.CEASEFIRE LIMITED. UPDATES (6-4-2008): BLAZE ACCELERATOR LIMITED.BARREL DRAGON BANNED.BLOWBACK DRAGON BANNED.DICE JAR BANNED.GAMBLER OF LEGEND BANNED.SAND GAMBLER BANNED.SOUL EXCHANGE LIMITED.FIEND'S SANCTUARY UNLIMITED.CUP OF ACE BANNED.TIME WIZARD BANNED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Technically, Victory Dragon and the rest of the Match cards shouldn't be considered when making a banlist. It's printed right on them, and only because your opponent can scoop before you get them to 0, thus going to the next match and not causing asn auto-fail. And if those are up there, what about Get Your Game on!, Obelisk, Slifer and Ra? also, Raiza doesn't need any limits now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I stopped reading at "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Well, at least it's better than your first one... I stopped reading at "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS." Perhaps he is predicting that the TCG will take the scoop-rule that the OCG has? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Congratulations on bringing back Chaos Sorcerer and Breaker. But I don't think that Caius or Kuraz deserve limitation. Also, lol at bringing back either Confiscation or Cyber Jar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I stopped reading at "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS." You should start reading after "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Irrelevant. Read the area on Armament where the password WOULD be. I stopped reading at "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS." You should start reading after "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS". Make a list that doesn't make outright erroneous moves, and it'd be possible. Note that to do such, you'd have to remove "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Victory Dragon is on the list, so I banned the rest of them. I banned Mind Crush so I could unban Confiscation and The Forceful Sentry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest setojim Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 too extreme! We need a few decently broken cards left in the game and some of your choices dont even make sense FAIL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Right, forgot about the whole "This card cannot be used in a Duel." thing. Unban them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Victory Dragon is the only Match Winner that isn't Illegal. Also, I'm not going to look for your changes. Add NEW! - Card A, Card B, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Victory Dragon is on the list' date=' so I banned the rest of them.[/quote'] Irrelevant. Read the area on Armament where the password WOULD be. I stopped reading at "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS." You should start reading after "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS". Make a list that doesn't make outright erroneous moves' date=' and it'd be possible. Note that to do such, you'd have to remove "ARMAMENT OF THE LETHAL LORDS."[/quote'] I banned Mind Crush so I could unban Confiscation and The Forceful Sentry. Thereby making this topic pointless until this erroneous move is eliminated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 too extreme! We need a few decently broken cards left in the game and some of your choices dont even make sense FAIL! Lol, He brought back freaking Confiscation and Forceful Sentry. He at least had the sense to ban DAD and JD, but seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 too extreme! We need a few decently broken cards left in the game and some of your choices dont even make sense FAIL! This is how we know that YCM may actually be worse than GameFAQs when it comes to YGO. GameFAQs Brigade, be sure to remember this post and use it as evidence if the time ever comes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Technically' date=' Victory Dragon and the rest of the Match cards shouldn't be considered when making a banlist. It's printed right on them, and only because your opponent can scoop before you get them to 0, thus going to the next match and not causing asn auto-fail. And if those are up there, what about Get Your Game on!, Obelisk, Slifer and Ra? [u']also, Raiza doesn't need any limits now?[/u] I need an answer to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Updated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Raiza does not require limitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I stopped reading at "BEAST KING BARBAROS." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I stopped reading at "BEAST KING BARBAROS." Explain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Raiza does not require limitation. Niether does JD or DAD, if you have 3 you're ready to use when they are unbanned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest setojim Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 ok so forceful is at 3?! FAIL!/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Now Victory Dragon is legal. Fail again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Raiza does not require limitation. Niether does JD or DAD' date=' if you have 3 you're ready to use when they are unbanned.[/quote'] Caius is better than Raiza. Also, should I limit Mystical Space Typhoon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I stopped reading at "BEAST KING BARBAROS." Explain. Burden of proof is always upon the side arguing for a Limitation or Prohibition - if you cannot make the case successfully, the card should revert to its default position at 3. You post this list and expect to not defend its components? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 It clears the opponent's field at the cost of 3 monsters. Do you need me to explain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.