Saturn of Elemia Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Hello everyone. I have another card for you to rate/hate/comment. I was looking at an image I recently acquired and it reminded me of an old Dragon-Type monster from the Metal Raiders set - Blackland Fire Dragon. This Vanilla monster was pretty decent when it first came out, but it quickly lost its luster. I figured that I could make a Fusion Monster with the image that used the "Blackland Fire Dragon". This card is what I came up with. Without further ado:CARD TEXT"Blackland Fire Dragon" + "Blackland Fire Dragon" + "Blackland Fire Dragon"This card cannot be Special Summoned except by Fusion Summon. Increase the ATK of this card by 100 points for each Dragon-Type monster removed from play. Negate the effect(s) of Effect Monsters destroyed by this card and remove them from play. When this card is destroyed by an opponent's Trap Card, you can remove this card from play to destroy all monsters on the field. Lemme know whatcha think. :D EDIT: Card text has been fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo-D Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Not bad. The picture could use a better background. I have some issues/questions about the effect: Do you intend it to remove from play all monsters it destroys? When you remove it from play after it was destroyed by a Trap, how many monsters does it destroy? 7/10 right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 1) Any monster it destroys is removed from play. 2) It will destroy all monsters on the field when you remove it from play. I edited the card and effect. This should answer your questions. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 A bit strong for a Fusion of 3 1500 ATK Monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Really? I thought that it would be fitting since you would have to use 3 monsters that are not used very much. I was going toward rewarding the player for using older cards. I do see where you are coming from. What would you suggest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo-D Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 1) Any monster it destroys is removed from play.2) It will destroy all monsters on the field when you remove it from play. I edited the card and effect. This should answer your questions. :D As of right now, this effect: "Negate the effect(s) of Effect Monsters destroyed by this card and remove them from play." does not remove all monster it destroys from play. This statement iterates that it will only remove monsters it destroys from play if it is an Effect Monster. You will need two separate sentences to accomplish your goal: one to negate the effect of Effect Monsters, and another to remove from play monsters it destroys by battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Maximus Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Not bad. The image could be better, perhaps give it a background. The card effect seems well thought out, though, besides being a little overpowered. All in all, good job. ;) 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 I think about 3500 would be more sensible. Also maybe lower the level to 10 or something. Its not a big deal but I would probably lower the level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aelsthla-Mental Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 I have to agree with Paladin, really good fusions should be made of old and/or weak cards to make up for their power. Because without the fusion they aren't so good. take this rather weak but somewhat correct e.g. Meteor Black Dragon and Black Skull Dragon Black Skull is weaker, but it has Summoned Skull, a decent attacker for one tribute (although Frostosaur now beats it most vanilla decks...). Meteor Black has Meteor Dragon, a card which is quite useless on it's own, as there are plenty better to use. Meh, anyway, i like the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Ah, I kinda rushed when I made that comment. The effect about the "removing effect monsters from play and negating their effect" is a slight variation of the effect on "Dark Lucius Lv.8": Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo-D Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Ah' date=' I kinda rushed when I made that comment. The effect about the "removing effect monsters from play and negating their effect" is a slight variation of the effect on "Dark Lucius Lv.8":[/quote'] You should have just copied it directly. That does what it's suppose to do because of the wording. When you changed the wording, you changed the result of the effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 I guess. I just think 4000 seems a little close to BEUD especially for 3 fusion Materials with only 1500 ATK. It also has a few powerful effects which more than make up for that kind of ATK power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 You're right. That's what I get for being in a rush. Sorry about that, guys. This isn't one of my best works; I got caught in the moment of making a card that I kinda rushed it. I gotta be more careful... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Word of advice Paladin "Quality not Quantity" As in make a card every so often. As fort eh card? It's not your best by far. It requires 3 never played monsters.... Keep trying though! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Thanks for the ratings, guys! Sorry for the disappointment. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 needs a clearer picture though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01alim Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Dissapointment? Don't feel bad but I agree that it should be 3500 ATK.9/10 since I love seeing unused cards being brought back to life, yeah! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Ill rate. 8.5/10. Not your best work but still pretty damn good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.