The Dark Knight

[TAG]

bad movie is BAD! First' date=' in the previous movies, Joker, played by Jack Nicholson, didn't have to do all of that messed up stuff, like lick himself and laugh randomly. Too many villains. Three baddies? Scarecrow, Two-Face, and Joker is way too much. Make it Joker and Scarecrow. Or kill scarecrow and add Two-Face, instead. There was too much special effects. And...um...Overall, plain SUCKAGE!

[/quote']

 

Are You Mentally Ill? The Movie Is Getting A Oscor Most Likely. And Of Heat Ledger Was Still Alive Like Altair Said He Would Of Became A Ruch God

Can You Please Not Capitalize Every First Letter? I am not mentally ill. The movie will get an oscar, but only because the movie industry sucks so much ass. What the bloody hell is Ruch? If you have ever seen a movie outside the year-2000 present timeframe, you'll se what true movies are about. Not the special effects, not the dramatic kabooms, but about how the actor plays. Christian Bale barely had lines as batman. He just said: 'Where is he.' And 'Where'd you put them.' He once did say some scientific BS as Bruce Wayne. You people don't understand true movies, that's why. Silencer: Go away.

Altair: Your avatar has something to say to you.

The rest of you moviegoers. Watch the dark knight. It's great [if you like special effects for everything, and crappy character introduction, and not-so-great storyline], but also can suck ass for those of you who have seen older movies and are possibly more mature.

 

Now this made total sense, and I agree. There are plenty of movies out of this time frame that pwn this movie.

There may be plenty of movies outside this time that are far, far superior to this one, but that doesn't mean that The Dark Knight is a bad movie. It just means that there are many movies that did even better. Also, considering ALOT of people are praising this movie, there's got to be a good number of them who have seen the older movies and are more mature.

[Phantom Roxas]

bad movie is BAD! First' date=' in the previous movies, Joker, played by Jack Nicholson, didn't have to do all of that messed up stuff, like lick himself and laugh randomly. Too many villains. Three baddies? Scarecrow, Two-Face, and Joker is way too much. Make it Joker and Scarecrow. Or kill scarecrow and add Two-Face, instead. There was too much special effects. And...um...Overall, plain SUCKAGE!

[/quote']

 

Let me guess...you like to watch movies like Ice Age and also like movies like Yu-gi-oh the Movie...give us all a break and stop with the sarcasm.

*sigh*

 

Excuse me. What?

Probably the dumbest thing someone's said about me. Seriously.

 

He is laughing at how you think that mature and awesome parts sucked.

 

and his favorite actor must be the Panda from Kung-Fu Panda' date=' not Jack Black, he's to awesome....

 

come on the more villians the better plus scarecrow was only in the first like what 5 minutes only.... and the "licking" and laughing made the character more realistic... this IS the true Joker, Heath Ledger was amazing.

 

[/quote']

I don't watch movies in general. I pirate them. We saw The Dark Knight only because of my friends.

Back on track: Pirating is the only thing that I usually do with movies.

Heath Ledger was ok, but should have slowed down on the licking. In the original, the joker was nowhere as near demonic. The demonic element is what made the Joker lovable to tweens like you, probably. Kung fu panda sucked, as well. Next!

 

You know that pirating movies is illegal, right? Also, Heath Ledger's constant licking further delivered The Joker's insanity, making the Demonic Element help Heath Ledger surpass Jack Nicholson. Yeah, I said it.

 

*Sigh*

I agree with the above statement. Q4T

 

This' date=' too, I believe, is a form of spam. It wastes people's time, usually, people should contribute to the thread. Instead, you degrade yourself to the level of 'Can't Make up my mind, so I follow what some other Dude says.' You can't get much lower than that.

[/quote']

 

No it's not, since Moderators do it too. It's pretty much saying that the contents of the posts were true. We do not degrade ourselves to say that, we simply say that what they say is either true our just awesome.

 

bad movie is BAD! First' date=' in the previous movies, Joker, played by Jack Nicholson, didn't have to do all of that messed up stuff, like lick himself and laugh randomly. Too many villains. Three baddies? Scarecrow, Two-Face, and Joker is way too much. Make it Joker and Scarecrow. Or kill scarecrow and add Two-Face, instead. There was too much special effects. And...um...Overall, plain SUCKAGE!

[/quote']

 

Are You Mentally Ill? The Movie Is Getting A Oscor Most Likely. And Of Heat Ledger Was Still Alive Like Altair Said He Would Of Became A Ruch God

Can You Please Not Capitalize Every First Letter? I am not mentally ill. The movie will get an oscar, but only because the movie industry sucks so much ass. What the bloody hell is Ruch? If you have ever seen a movie outside the year-2000 present timeframe, you'll se what true movies are about. Not the special effects, not the dramatic kabooms, but about how the actor plays. Christian Bale barely had lines as batman. He just said: 'Where is he.' And 'Where'd you put them.' He once did say some scientific BS as Bruce Wayne. You people don't understand true movies, that's why. Silencer: Go away.

Altair: Your avatar has something to say to you.

The rest of you moviegoers. Watch the dark knight. It's great [if you like special effects for everything, and crappy character introduction, and not-so-great storyline], but also can suck ass for those of you who have seen older movies and are possibly more mature.

 

He can capitalize every letter if he wants to. You may not be mentally ill, but you are insulting a great movie simply because Christian Bale was "bad" as Batman. If you ask me, he did a very good job as both Bruce Wayne AND Batman. Silencer and Altair are telling you to shut up, so you have no right to tell them to stop when they are correct. Also, how are we immature for not seeing older movies?

[Cyber Altair]

Shut The F*** Up Cereal.

 

If at first i'm gonna take someone's word about a movie i wouldn't take it from someone who's name is "Cereal on a Stove" or "Cereal on a Balcony" or anything that has the word "Cereal" in it to start with. My sir, you say that the Joker sucked because he was too demonic. Guess what My Sir. The Joker is demonic, all the previous Joker's, ALL, sucked. Why so may you ask me Sir, answer is simple. The Joker is a twisted, demonic, genius, unpredictable, free thinking and extremely witty villain.. Please don't tell me that if he didn't look freaky and "licked" himself every know and then the movie would have been better. No it wouldn't, it's the small stuff that matters and truly build The Joker's personality, attitude, behavior and the whole movie itself. Also if you say that anything made before the 2000 was a true movie then your wrong, don't tell me that every single movie made in the 2000 and above failed because it had special effects and dramatic kabooms because these make the movie WAY more enjoyable and don't tell me that every movie before the 2000 was amazing cause believe me most of them sucked balls.

 

Now when you say that the previous Joker's were better allow me Sir to prove you wrong. Was this a good Joker?

NO. Was this a better Joker?

Hell NO. You see it's the makeup on the face that Ledger had that made him look so realistic, it's the licking that made him look realistic and better. I mean no offence but what the hell where they thinking when the brought the fat guy to do The Joker? Ledger perfomance was way better then all his followers and tbh no one could have done a better job, even Brad Pitt.

 

Now please come back and tell me if i'm wrong. Also just so you know watching the movie in the theater and PAYING for it is a whole new experience...

[Silencerleader]

Shut The F*** Up Cereal.

 

If at first i'm gonna take someone's word about a movie i wouldn't take it from someone who's name is "Cereal on a Stove" or "Cereal on a Balcony" or anything that has the word "Cereal" in it to start with. My sir' date=' you say that the Joker sucked because he was too demonic. Guess what My Sir. The Joker is demonic, all the previous Joker's, ALL, sucked. Why so may you ask me Sir, answer is simple. The Joker is a twisted, demonic, genius, unpredictable, free thinking and extremely witty villain.. Please don't tell me that if he didn't look freaky and "licked" himself every know and then the movie would have been better. No it wouldn't, it's the small stuff that matters and truly build The Joker's personality, attitude, behavior and the whole movie itself. Also if you say that anything made before the 2000 was a true movie then your wrong, don't tell me that every single movie made in the 2000 and above failed because it had special effects and dramatic kabooms because these make the movie WAY more enjoyable and don't tell me that every movie before the 2000 was amazing cause believe me most of them sucked balls.

 

Now when you say that the previous Joker's were better allow me Sir to prove you wrong. Was this a good Joker?

[img']http://media.ignimgs.com/stars/stars/image/article/841/841564/cesarromerojoker_1197657498.jpg[/img]

NO. Was this a better Joker?

Hell NO. You see it's the makeup on the face that Ledger had that made him look so realistic, it's the licking that made him look realistic and better. I mean no offence but what the hell where they thinking when the brought the fat guy to do The Joker? Ledger perfomance was way better then all his followers and tbh no one could have done a better job, even Brad Pitt.

 

Now please come back and tell me if i'm wrong. Also just so you know watching the movie in the theater and PAYING for it is a whole new experience...

 

ROFL.

It's Ronald McDonald gone wrong.

[Cyber Altair]

he sucked imo....