ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 it was the same way with the lack of understanding in how it worked. For the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US scientists only expected a quick and near painless death, which meant they expected only a death rate of about 100,000 total. But when news of what the radiation was doing to the Japanese people, the American public began to turn against such bombings. No one knew the radiation was supposed to do that back then, and as a result the death rate (which is still happening today) has reached over 350,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Prince_of_Death Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works, I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much We can make more, I don't know why we don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Prince_of_Death Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much thats the problem with the hydrogen energy source, it's too expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much thats the problem with the hydrogen energy source, it's too expensive. Otherwise I'm sure the whole country would have converted to hydrogen cards by now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much thats the problem with the hydrogen energy source, it's too expensive. Otherwise I'm sure the whole country would have converted to hydrogen cards by now They might if we stick to our theories convert it around 2030 or something. We will all be dead before that though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much thats the problem with the hydrogen energy source, it's too expensive. Otherwise I'm sure the whole country would have converted to hydrogen cards by now They might if we stick to our theories convert it around 2030 or something. We will all be dead before that though. That's only 21 years away, we'll all still be around Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Prince_of_Death Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 if tat was possible(the whole country converting to hydrogen cars), then where would the market be now? the are so many problems with the hydrogen cars just like when E-85 was first brought into use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much thats the problem with the hydrogen energy source, it's too expensive. Otherwise I'm sure the whole country would have converted to hydrogen cards by now They might if we stick to our theories convert it around 2030 or something. We will all be dead before that though. That's only 21 years away, we'll all still be around Due to most of the theories about the tree's running out by around 2020, we will probley be dead but I don't care about that. Not yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 if tat was possible(the whole country converting to hydrogen cars)' date=' then where would the market be now? the are so many problems with the hydrogen cars just like when E-85 was first brought into use.[/quote'] actually I forgot about what the problems were now (been a while). Mind listing them?You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much thats the problem with the hydrogen energy source, it's too expensive. Otherwise I'm sure the whole country would have converted to hydrogen cards by now They might if we stick to our theories convert it around 2030 or something. We will all be dead before that though. That's only 21 years away, we'll all still be around Due to most of the theories about the tree's running out by around 2020, we will probley be dead but I don't care about that. Not yet. Actually regarding the trees running out by 2020, I think that's more oil side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 if tat was possible(the whole country converting to hydrogen cars)' date=' then where would the market be now? the are so many problems with the hydrogen cars just like when E-85 was first brought into use.[/quote'] actually I forgot about what the problems were now (been a while). Mind listing them?You guys I still stick to my compressed Nitrogen theory. It could really help the planet. it works' date=' I've seen it in action. I have seen a video of people coming up with energy efficient cars for the future and the compressed nitrogen made a fast time, beats most cars in races as long as its for short distance ones.[/quote'] The same goes with hydrogen fueled cars, but the money needed for this is far too much thats the problem with the hydrogen energy source, it's too expensive. Otherwise I'm sure the whole country would have converted to hydrogen cards by now They might if we stick to our theories convert it around 2030 or something. We will all be dead before that though. That's only 21 years away, we'll all still be around Due to most of the theories about the tree's running out by around 2020, we will probley be dead but I don't care about that. Not yet. Actually regarding the trees running out by 2020, I think that's more oil side Thats great, well not great about running out but great that it ties in with this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 personally I doubt it'll run out before 2020 though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Prince_of_Death Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 it is possible to run out of trees before 2020. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 it is possible to run out of trees before 2020. you think we're chopping them down too quickly for house building and such? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Yeah if you thing about it now there is only a couple of major forests now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Yeah if you thing about it now there is only a couple of major forests now. true, the Amazon rainforest is rapidly disappearing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 yeah but that's ALL the forests in the world right now, not just the major ones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 I know but just look at that, there is not one forest or land type place around me for about 100 or more miles ¬_¬ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 I know but just look at that' date=' there is not one forest or land type place around me for about 100 or more miles ¬_¬[/quote'] I'm in the southwestern US, it's a complete desert here. I know what you mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Prince_of_Death Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 yeah but that's ALL the forests in the world right now' date=' not just the major ones[/quote'] true, also the forests in brazil seems to being chopped down much farther than the pic shows.(saw on the news a long time ago about it, so most of the forests in South America are most likely gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Yeah, if you notice, the UK is overpopulated yet the USA isn't. Now we better get back on topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 yeah but that's ALL the forests in the world right now' date=' not just the major ones[/quote'] true, also the forests in brazil seems to being chopped down much farther than the pic shows.(saw on the news a long time ago about it, so most of the forests in South America are most likely gone. Save for the Amazon, but it'll probably be gone in 20 years anyway if we keep this up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Just like I say, I guess my school isn't so stupid. They still waist tones of paper a day, we all have laptops now so we can switch to technology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.