PrometheusMFD Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 give wind some time' date=' Prometheus. Back in the 50s that's what we initially said on nuclear due to the radiation problems, but that problem was solved quickly. Sometimes efficient energy sources don't have quick solutions to them, you know.[/quote'] Wind=InconsistantInconsistant=Occaisional reliability on other sources of powerORoOSoP=Not very efficiant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 yeah I know, what we need is to also be able to create our own wind that doesn't require as much energy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 ... That would make a perpetual motion machine, which is a physical impossibilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 so you don't believe in the generating a form of energy for us to get another form energy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 An energy generator requires more energy to produce the energy than it actually produces.Perpetual Motion is impossible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 well I never said I'm only going to use ONE energy generator. You use one generator to generate the wind. and others to turn the wind into useful energy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 How about atoms, break the bonds and it releases a powerful explosion/power. We have been trying to harness it but it's just to hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 How about atoms' date=' break the bonds and it releases a powerful explosion/power. We have been trying to harness it but it's just to hard.[/quote'] That is how a hydrogen bomb works. It would destroy the facility. (The first hydrogen bomb tested was several times stronger than the sum of all the bombs dropped during World War II, including the Nukes) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 OH NOAZ they are testing that by smashing thousands of atoms together at thousands of miles over here, WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE. But seriously I don't think that couple of billion pounds test will work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted January 23, 2009 Report Share Posted January 23, 2009 OH NOAZ they are testing that by smashing thousands of atoms together at thousands of miles over here' date=' WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE. But seriously I don't think that couple of billion pounds test will work.[/quote'] Are you teh British?Ah Britian... you still owe us for that tea incident.Anyway, harnessing the power of an atom is still less efficient then fusion, wich is more attainable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 23, 2009 Report Share Posted January 23, 2009 How about atoms' date=' break the bonds and it releases a powerful explosion/power. We have been trying to harness it but it's just to hard.[/quote'] That is how a hydrogen bomb works. It would destroy the facility. (The first hydrogen bomb tested was several times stronger than the sum of all the bombs dropped during World War II, including the Nukes) That's obvious, upon detonation of ANY kind the hydrogen needs expand itself in order to cool itself down (that's what determines the blast radius) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.