Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 The most obvious target for this statement is, of course, Crush Card Virus, but there is always a chance that another extremely-limited-release card could find its way into the game. In that case, this statenent applies to that card, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 Agreed long time ago with that statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 Most people figured this out ages ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 It's no fun when people just agree with you. Sometimes I wish that this place would go back to the way it was in February... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 i believe this has already been discussed, and the availability of a card should never come between the decision to ban the card. the only argument i could see is if their is little supply then even something that has a bad impact on the game would be minimized to a minimum, however i do not agree with this argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoPaladin2008 Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 ^ no, it would be minimized to a maximum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axiom_Nor Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 CCV = Common print in JP.CCV = Impossibly rare in EN. Its availability should not be a factor... but. it would suck if you had one of ten cards, and couldn't play it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 availability of a card should not affect whether it should be banned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 It's no fun when people just agree with you. Sometimes I wish that this place would go back to the way it was in February... Actually, I agree. Oh wait.... Sorry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 Most people figured this out ages ago Except we STILL get the same arguments when suggesting Crush should be banned on other boards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 Apparently Des Volstgalph is coming in Gold Series 2. after that, everybody will want that one. But it's true. Even though it's insanely rare, it shouldn't be affected by the Banlist. -PD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 No one will care about sheet like Volstgaph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 death to crush card!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 No one will care about s*** like Volstgaph. Not for playing, but for Trading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 I would want him just because his art is bad-A. His effect is... not bad-A, but it's better than Leogun. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 Brokeness is the only thing that should influence a said cards banworthiness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 Brokeness is the only thing that should influence a said cards banworthiness. Wrong, wrong, wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Brokeness is the only thing that should influence a said cards banworthiness. Wrong' date=' wrong, wrong[/quote'] combo capability also should play a factor, stratos is one example, any eli, d, or evil hero you want, just by playing the card. thats both broken and a combo monkey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Brokeness is the only thing that should influence a said cards banworthiness. Wrong' date=' wrong, wrong[/quote'] combo capability also should play a factor, stratos is one example, any eli, d, or evil hero you want, just by playing the card. thats both broken and a combo monkey. You are also wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Brokeness is the only thing that should influence a said cards banworthiness. Wrong' date=' wrong, wrong[/quote'] combo capability also should play a factor, stratos is one example, any eli, d, or evil hero you want, just by playing the card. thats both broken and a combo monkey. You are also wrong then what? tell us if you know, otherwise you don't have much to say your wrong for. please i would like to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Read this- http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-65093.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.