Psycho Shocker Android Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 More than fair you also took 1000 of their LP. And it's good for dark worlds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Anyway:Also' date=' how would [i']not[/i] using it allow them to avoid losing? You have misread my post. They need to use it in order to avoid losing, even though it would normally be far better to use it at a different time. Your opponent has Gorz, and most likely Kaien, out. Tell me when I should use Vortex. You should use it during Main Phase 2. In the absence of Gorz, you would almost certainly use it during Main Phase 1. Gorz forces plays that are otherwise sub-optimal. Also, suppose you happen to not have Lightning Vortex in your hand at exactly the right time? What are you going to do, spend a Smashing and a PWWB, or whatever else happens to be handy? I'll still blow up Gorz. Sure, let's keep Gorz around, since if the opponent is lucky they'll be able to spend two cards to stop him. And then let's legalize Delinquent Duo. After all, the opponent loses two cards from their hand, but Delinquent Duo gets dumped in the graveyard. Sounds fair. Losing two cards isn't that bad....if you have a good hand that is. Delinquet Duo=Random example much, or just something to show another way of losing two cards as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Anyway:Also' date=' how would [i']not[/i] using it allow them to avoid losing? You have misread my post. They need to use it in order to avoid losing, even though it would normally be far better to use it at a different time. Your opponent has Gorz, and most likely Kaien, out. Tell me when I should use Vortex. You should use it during Main Phase 2. In the absence of Gorz, you would almost certainly use it during Main Phase 1. Gorz forces plays that are otherwise sub-optimal. Also, suppose you happen to not have Lightning Vortex in your hand at exactly the right time? What are you going to do, spend a Smashing and a PWWB, or whatever else happens to be handy? I'll still blow up Gorz. Sure, let's keep Gorz around, since if the opponent is lucky they'll be able to spend two cards to stop him. And then let's legalize Delinquent Duo. After all, the opponent loses two cards from their hand, but Delinquent Duo gets dumped in the graveyard. Sounds fair. Losing two cards isn't that bad....if you have a good hand that is. Delinquet Duo=Random example much, or just something to show another way of losing two cards as well? I was highlighting the fact that your arguments all amount to "If the opponent has a good hand, he can spend two cards to counter Gorz". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Anyway:Also' date=' how would [i']not[/i] using it allow them to avoid losing? You have misread my post. They need to use it in order to avoid losing, even though it would normally be far better to use it at a different time. Your opponent has Gorz, and most likely Kaien, out. Tell me when I should use Vortex. You should use it during Main Phase 2. In the absence of Gorz, you would almost certainly use it during Main Phase 1. Gorz forces plays that are otherwise sub-optimal. Also, suppose you happen to not have Lightning Vortex in your hand at exactly the right time? What are you going to do, spend a Smashing and a PWWB, or whatever else happens to be handy? I'll still blow up Gorz. Sure, let's keep Gorz around, since if the opponent is lucky they'll be able to spend two cards to stop him. And then let's legalize Delinquent Duo. After all, the opponent loses two cards from their hand, but Delinquent Duo gets dumped in the graveyard. Sounds fair. Losing two cards isn't that bad....if you have a good hand that is. Delinquet Duo=Random example much, or just something to show another way of losing two cards as well? I was highlighting the fact that your arguments all amount to "If the opponent has a good hand, he can spend two cards to counter Gorz". Point taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.