-DJ- Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 Do you think that exacution should be stoped? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 No. I don't balieve it should be stoppad. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miazo Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 No it's really cool. The body seperates from the head.lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 Yes it should be stopped. What kind of punishment is it? Stupid AND Criminal. Also, what if they were wrongly accused? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 Yes it should be stopped. What kind of punishment is it? Stupid AND Criminal. Also' date=' what if they were wrongly accused?[/quote'] Very few people get killed after being wrongly accused. It's more of a murder and justice kind of thing. If we think they killed someone, they they should die as a penance. Honestly, do you think Charles Manson should have been allowed to continue living? What about the hillside strangler? Exactlay. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinotornes Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 How is that punishment? The are dead! Punishment is making them suffer in prison for years. It's like the 'If u don't eat ur vegetables, u get no desert' punishment the veges are toture and if you don't eat them u get tortured by having to watch everyone else eat their desert. So in short it is stoopid too execute them they deserve to rot in prison and the possibility of being raped by a bigger man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 But few people means some. And if we get on to 'Eye For Eye' then rapists... You know what I mean. It just doesn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 Stop Executions? Yes. If you think that someone deserves to lose their life because the killed someone, what do you do if they killed two people? If you send them to prison, they can stay for extra time. Stop Executions? Who cares. I guess it kind of doesn't matter. If you are in jail for 25 years, there will be nothing for you when you get out. You might just die in prison anyway. Stop Execution? No. People who end lives, don't deserve one. Once you get out of jail, will you have anything to look forwards to? No. You will start stealing or maybe even kill to get back to jail. There are all three of my opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 I say yes, no and maybe for the same reasons as Ninja Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 Prisoners= Cost extra money Killing = Easy option Prisons are already overcrowded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DJ- Posted November 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Prisoners= Cost extra money Killing = Easy option Prisons are already overcrowded yeah me agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrekstasy Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 exacution? It's spelled: Execution. No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zack Blaze Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Yes and No Yes - They deserve the same punishment they did to the killed victim. No - It makes them suffer before they are Executed and they dont become unconcious until 30 seconds after they are beheaded, shot, or Poisoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Yes, but shoot them while they're unconscious and then pop 'em in the furnace if things get too crowded Yes - They deserve the same punishment they did to the killed victim. ...even rape? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zack Blaze Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 If a person killed the person then raped them then its still murder. But if they just raped them while they were alive then the should just be thrown in prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakura Vessal Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 If a person killed the person then raped them then its still murder. But if they just raped them while they were alive then the should just be thrown in prison. I don't think you understood what he said. You said they deserve the same punishment as the victem. And he asked about rape and if they should be raped to death like the victem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 I am a great supporter of whatever will help keep the population down. And execution is a.. weak way of doing this, but at the same time benefits us by getting rid of people who would do bad for society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zack Blaze Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 I understood what he said. And I am saying that if they killed the victim then the should also die. But if the victim is still alive then the sould just be put in prison, not raped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 That undermines he 'eye for eye' Idea, as many crimes can't happen in reverse. Execution is bad. Canada is great, and we do not have execution! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cin Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 I don't like when people apply 'an eye for an eye' surely then the person who executed them then falls into this rule? And the cycle goes on and on, until basically everyone is dead. Mental torture has to be worse than maybe a few moments of extreme physical pain, we want to punish them don't we. Make them live with what they did, like the victims (and/or family of the victim) of their crime do. Anyway death is an easy way out why else would so many prisoners attempted suicide. Prisoners are overcrowded because there's not enough community sentences (Mainly the UK, which is fit to bursting, we have 2 prisons within 10 miles of me). More people should be humiliated by having to do community service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Message to the Masses Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 No. I don't balieve it should be stoppad. stupid jabroni i hope u get exacuted just so u can no what it feel like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakura Vessal Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 No. I don't balieve it should be stoppad. stupid b**** i hope u get exacuted just so u can no what it feel like Just because your the only one here who proberly will get exacuited for complete stupidity, doesn't mean you sware at other people for stating what should happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelioSpark Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 I really don't have a problem with it. What goes around comes around I guess... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 Which brings us to the pint, "if I steal a gummy bear, what could go wrong?" This "What Goes Around Comes Back Around Theorie" doesn't work, as I have donated money, and I did NOT get anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holy Babylon Posted December 3, 2008 Report Share Posted December 3, 2008 *Guy walks in with rocket launcher and kills hungry orphans, then runs off and kill the president* Lawyer: This man does not deserve the death sentence, no man deserve-Me: No orphan deserves to be killed by a killer, no people should be left without a leader.Lawyer: My client pledges insanity, your honor.Me: No orphan deserves to be killed by a psycho, no people should be left without a leader.Lawyer: My client deserves free medical insurance, food, shelter, and money from the government sent to his prison to keep him alive when they could be spending it on our broken economy or starving children.Me: No orphan, president, or any other person deserves to not have a shot at life, this man wasted his when he made the decision to kill these people.Lawyer: He was insane.Me: No orphan, president, or any other person deserves to not have a shot at life, this man wasted his when he made the insane decision to kill these people.Lawyer: My client can't be killed.Me: No normal person can kill orphans, but a man who wants to die himself. If Hitler had not lived, would he have been put into a nice, warm, comforting prison? After he killed millions of people, he would have been given the chance to live? Figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.